Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Sewell is drafted before #8...


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

If Sewell is gone at 8, I say we trade back no further than 15.  We should be able to get either Slater or Darisaw still and possibly pick up an extra 2nd in the process.

I dunno...

Both the Chargers and especially the Vikings could go tackle. 

If they have Darrisaw as LT2 and really like him, take him at 8. Left tackle has been a massive need for way too long. 

But again, all depends what their board looks like. If they have 3-4 guys lumped in there closely then it makes sense to trade back but if Darrisaw is their clear #2... just take him 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I dunno...

Both the Chargers and especially the Vikings could go tackle. 

If they have Darrisaw as LT2 and really like him, take him at 8. Left tackle has been a massive need for way too long. 

But again, all depends what their board looks like. If they have 3-4 guys lumped in there closely then it makes sense to trade back but if Darrisaw is their clear #2... just take him 

We do need a LT.  Here is what scares me--there are some good CBs that should be on the board---all of them, in fact.  There are good tackles that will be available in round 2--do we get cute and chase a CB, then "settle" at OT in round 2?  I mean, round 2 could feature Eichenberg, W. Little, Leatherwood, etc.  Not what I would do, but...

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

If Sewell is gone at 8, I say we trade back no further than 15.  We should be able to get either Slater or Darisaw still and possibly pick up an extra 2nd in the process.

The Darnold trade gives the Panthers flexibility to trade down and not feel desperate to grab a QB. We haven't seen the Panthers trade down in the 1st since 2007. I think it's time to start accumulating picks to fill out a depleted roster.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Stay at 8 and get the best talent.  If we pick Parsons... great.  Shaq is a goner next year.

Not after Fritterere pushed more money into the future years.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Pitts, Chase are my picks if Sewell is gone. My personal pick is Kwity Paye. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

The closer we get I am seriously warming to Pitts at 8 if Sewell is gone.  OT in round 2 and lets roll.  This offense will be seriously talented.

I cant dismiss the idea of grabbing Pitts if he is there.  The matchup problems would help Darnold

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Not after Fritterere pushed more money into the future years.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Pitts, Chase are my picks if Sewell is gone. My personal pick is Kwity Paye. 

Pitts, Sewell, and Chase are just on a level of their own.  I would throw Trevor on that pile--4 players who are the best of the best. 

If one is there, you have to have a plan to take him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see the issues with Tyreek, which is why I put an asterisk on him and all the way on the bottom. I don't even see him playing at all this entire year since he hasn't even been seen working out at all. But I do not think he's as hard to play with as Stefon Diggs is IMO and Tyreek is more of a game changer. But either way, it's pie in the sky.  Always loved Keenan and he is from the Carolinas so that's really the only thing that may interest him playing here if no one is giving him any calls to play.
    • It's not that I'm not rooting for him to do well, but I'd be lying if I said him having a good season wouldn't scare me after what we've seen out of him so far. I'd be afraid of it just being one of those situations you see all the time, a player is in a make it or break it season, they somehow raise their level of play to new levels, and then proceed to immediately drop back off a cliff the next season (although this does usually happen in contract years, not a player trying to not get cut). Now, if you tell me that no matter how well he plays, we're then going to flip him for a draft pick in the offseason, then yea, I'd want him to go off for a monster season so we can get a better return.
    • Helllllllllllllll no on Tyreek, not even on a vet minimum and if he was playing at his peak abilities. We have way too young of a WR room to bring that head case into the locker room, there is just no way I want him around any of our WRs.  The things that make him great aren't things that can be taught, they're his natural born athletic gifts, so there isn't anything useful he can teach our guys and would just be a bad influence on them. Same goes for Stefon Diggs. Allen I'd love, he'd be a great mentor for T-Mac and Coker, but I doubt he plays anywhere other than with the Chargers or a legit true SB contender this year (and only small odds on the latter there, likely Chargers or nothing I'd guess).
×
×
  • Create New...