Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record: WHO DO YOU WANT!

Brooklyn 3.0

By Brooklyn 3.0,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Yeah I’ve thought about that too. I assume we keep DJ but even if we plan on keeping him...without Samuel if DJ gets hurt we get pretty thin as far as receiving options. 
 

But there is just such a huge talent gap imo between the top OTs and 2nd round compared to the top WRs and guys found on day 2. 

I mean I assume the plan is to draft a young QB at some point.   A freak show TE seems like a great resource to develop him. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean I assume the plan is to draft a young QB at some point.   A freak show TE seems like a great resource to develop him. 
 

 

That's why I think some of you got this wrong.. If plan ABC was trade for vet QB. And the fact they were willing to trade a boat load for Stafford or Watson and not trade up for a rookie let's me know a rookie QB may not be anything they want..  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

That's why I think some of you got this wrong.. If plan ABC was trade for vet QB. And the fact they were willing to trade a boat load for Stafford or Watson and not trade up for a rookie let's me know a rookie QB may not be anything they want..  

I don’t think Tepper has a set in stone model.   This off-season was weird.  You don’t normally get a Stafford and Watson up for grabs.  That’s not normal in the NFL.     So he wasn’t just going to let it go without trying.  That simply won’t be an option going forward most likely because we don’t see that often 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

I don’t think Tepper has a set in stone model.   This off-season was weird.  You don’t normally get a Stafford and Watson up for grabs.  That’s not normal in the NFL.     So he wasn’t just going to let it odd with the out trying.  That simply won’t be an option going forward most likely because we don’t see that often 

But it has been the last few seasons Tom, last year, Stafford this year, Maybe Rodgers,  and Russell next year..  I think they are building a team to get a vet..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

But it has been the last few seasons Tom, last year, Stafford this year, Maybe Rodgers,  and Russell next year..  I think they are building a team to get a vet..

I don’t count Brady.  Too weird.  He is like 78.  Regardless of what his contract says you basically get him for a year and he lets you know after that.  

he is basically a one year championship run rental 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jorgie said:

This might not be popular but

1. Fields 

2. Pitts

3. Sewell

4. Trade Back

number 3 and 4 are very interchangeable to me depending on the offer

I really like Fields. I’m just not convinced that his career trajectory is going to be ALOT different from Kellen Mond. 
 

Basically imo the only way it is a lot different is if he becomes Deshaun 2.0 and is a MVP candidate in a really good system. 
 

Mond imo could just as easily be a top 15 QB in the right system....and he’s not gonna go in the top 10. 
 

Contrast that with the #2 TE or #3 OT behind Pitts and Sewell/Slater. I’m not sure that’s the case. Those three guys imo are much more sure-thing top tier players than Fields is compared to Mond. If that’s makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      ESPN: "Future" Power Rankings

      By Basbear · Posted

      I would take the giants roster over Panthers. Lawrence, 3 OLB/DEs, Thomas, and nabers. Lawrence is better than dbrown and Thomas is better than icky. Panthers don't have one edge that would start over those 3 not matter how people feel about burns. Id believe....I think I would take nabers over the whole WR group....Id need to think about, but I feel it is right or 50/50..... Now after the top 10, Panthers may have claim. Im just not that big of a NFL fan like past time to make a good case. I'd just take giants on their top talent.    I will say this, if BY carries this team to the playoffs, he alone would flip this. 
    • ForJimmy
      Monday practice tweets

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Looks like he ran out of real estate.  He had 5 total TDs. As good as we have ever seen in Carolina? Looks like he is the only QB in our history with 3 passing and 2 rushing TDs and he tied a single game record of 5 TDs in one game with Cam and Beurlein.  Throw in his 73.4% completions and zero turnovers, literally the ONLY thing you could argue against statistically is total yardage which was only 275.  You may not agree with that statement (not 100% sure I do), but it's really not THAT wild...
    • Basbear
      ESPN: "Future" Power Rankings

      By Basbear · Posted

      I have for too long lacked giving good posting beers, fire, etc.  Good post, its beyond prove it time and until then 30s is where they belong. 
×
×
  • Create New...