Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jamarr chase at 8?


RIPTreyLance
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hear me out. I know we never invest in left tackles and this is a prime opportunity to do so, but if Kyle pitts and Penei Sewell are gone, would anyone really be MAD about picking Chase? By all accounts he's the best prospect we've seen since julio. 

Can you truly be mad taking Julio Jones at 8?

 

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Hear me out. I know we never invest in left tackles and this is a prime opportunity to do so, but if Kyle pitts and Penei Sewell are gone, would anyone really be MAD about picking Chase? By all accounts he's the best prospect we've seen since julio. 

Can you truly be mad taking Julio Jones at 8?

 

I for one wouldn't but Zod might want to stand by the server for a meltdown if we chose a WR at 8. 

I said earlier if Pitts and Sewell are gone at 8.  Trade down with a team that wants a QB because most likely if those two are off the board there is going to be a QB at 8. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I for one wouldn't but Zod might want to stand by the server for a meltdown if we chose a WR at 8. 

I said earlier if Pitts and Sewell are gone at 8.  Trade down with a team that wants a QB because most likely if those two are off the board there is going to be a QB at 8. 

Also. Joe Brady had Jamarr at LSU.. could imagine he's halfway pounding the table for him if Pitts or Sewell aren't there 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I for one wouldn't but Zod might want to stand by the server for a meltdown if we chose a WR at 8. 

I said earlier if Pitts and Sewell are gone at 8.  Trade down with a team that wants a QB because most likely if those two are off the board there is going to be a QB at 8. 

I think we will take Pitts or a WR and not a T, but I want a T. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Agent Blue said:

not a chance in hell we draft a WR at 8 with our crappy OL and already having Moore and Robby. 

i mean, maybe if Chase was some 6'5 Megatron clone, but he aint. 

According to Verge, there is a strong possibility we draft a WR--Waddle is the name she mentions repeatedly--And I agree with the OL comment--but here is how they might be looking at it:

We have addressed it by signing Scott and Erv at LT, Elfein at LG, Miller at RG, Tagging Moton.

I do not like Erv and Elf, but they seem to or they would not have offered multi-year contracts on the first day of tampering at about 8:30 AM

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think we will take Pitts or a WR and not a T, but I want a T. 

Picking your brain.  What makes you think we won't go LT?  (Curious not insulting)

You don't think Slater is worthy of this pick?  Some say he's better than Sewell.

WR IMO is a luxury pick, something we really can't afford if we plan on contending soon.   I think with the trade of Darnold the best thing we can do is put a good O-line in front of him. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Picking your brain.  What makes you think we won't go LT?  (Curious not insulting)

You don't think Slater is worthy of this pick?  Some say he's better than Sewell.

WR IMO is a luxury pick, something we really can't afford if we plan on contending soon.   I think with the trade of Darnold the best thing we can do is put a good O-line in front of him. 

 

I think Sewell is the guy if he is on the board, and we could take Slater if Sewell is gone or not--not sure--but there are a few factors that opened my eyes, Dave.  And I am with you--I want a LT.

However, Verge has some inside info--a scout (or something) for a team that is fairly in step with what Carolina is thinking--they have a pretty reliable grapevine, I would imagine.  She says Carolina wants a weapon.  And (see Unicar post) Moore and Anderson could be on the final years of contracts--we shall see how we like them.  However, I think they see Waddle as the KR/PR/Slot that can break games open....I did not have WRs on my Panther board in the first round.  I think it was Aussie who said we could get R. Moore in the second round after the T in the first.  Good points.

And finally, I think THEY THINK they have addressed the OL---we shall see.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is a really good WR and they have a rookie QB so they can afford it. Look at what they have been wasting on Cousins for years? That's where this cap came from lol. Now the guaranteed money is high but Minny had to keep him while taking a shot on a rookie QB.     
    • Johnson is very smart IMO. He will get paid either way but avoiding a terrible spot can save your career too. He looks to be working the system and good for him. I always thought hiring interviews go both ways and have been disappointed watching people not realize this. He handled DC roughly but it was also funny because he did see them as what they are which is a new ownership group, even with Petters, he would be likely be destined for failure there while they figure out the normal learning curve of the NFL.  It's not lying it's just 'your great but I can't say what your not because that is taboo'. Sometimes lies are expected if the truth isn't what they want.  I agree generally. Ron was doing great work as a DC where he put in 6 years as DC at 2 teams vs Canales 1 year as OC before becoming a HC. Ron is such a known quantity by now, he earned his 2nd shot as a HC and it went as expected given his proclivities. Offense is just safer in this NFL vs Defense so any one that can score will get a look. Ryans is a beast but how do you think he fairs without Slowick? Which HCs were in the SB? Offensive guys. It's a thing and makes laughing about TB, Atlanta and NO all having beatable defensive coaches the Panthers still can't beat LOL. It's a dump. If your building a career the Panthers are a long shot. If you are taking a shot, getting paid and/or ready to grow from this failure then this is a great option. I think the jobs are extremely valuable on many levels but there is always a turd in the punchbowl with Tepper. Hurney, Rhule, Friterer, now Caldwell and maybe Morgan. Tepper always leaves some dookie around to contaminate the next batch...they literally help him fug up the next time. It's Tepper's MO, spend lots of money and lean on past failures into new failures. There has not been a truly fresh start under Tepper yet which explains why he keeps failing. 
    • yeah lol never say it can't get any worse with David Tepper in charge 
×
×
  • Create New...