Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who's your tradeback partner and why?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Chicago sitting at 20 knows they must get a QB

Pace and Nagy are on HOT SEATS

 

Trey Lance is sitting there at 8

 

Chicago sends

2021: 1st, 2nd

2022: 1st, 5th

 

Carolina sends:

2021: 1st

2022: 6th

 

Carolina gets ammo to make up for 2022 second rounder for Darnold and get a lineman like Slater at 20

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Trainwreck said:

NE at 15th would be the lowest I’ll go. I will consider WFT if a good offer was there. Chicago at 20 would have to give me a king ransom for it to happen. I’m talking at least two 1st and two 2nd to even start the conversation. 

NE moving to 8 probably cost them their second rounder only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheBigKat said:

Chicago sitting at 20 knows they must get a QB

Pace and Nagy are on HOT SEATS

 

Trey Lance is sitting there at 8

 

Chicago sends

2021: 1st, 2nd

2022: 1st, 5th

 

Carolina sends:

2021: 1st

2022: 6th

 

Carolina gets ammo to make up for 2022 second rounder for Darnold and get a lineman like Slater at 20

This is way too rich for Chicago to move up.  Jeez

Like 8 for 20 and they send us a second and third and something next year.  Maybe a 2.  At most.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Shocker said:

NE moving to 8 probably cost them their second rounder only.

If it's during the draft and we're on the clock with Denver, Chicago, New England and Philly behind us, we would get more than a 2nd from New England. The extra pick may not come until next year though.  If Jones is on the board we could get more from NE I think though for sure.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panfanman said:

If it's during the draft and we're on the clock with Denver, Chicago, New England and Philly behind us, we would get more than a 2nd from New England. The extra pick may not come until next year though.  If Jones is on the board we could get more from NE I think though for sure.

Agree...just putting realistic expectations out here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, classics said:

So I'm new to all this and really don't get into all the trading what ifs, but if Lance is there at 8, wouldn't you at least think about taking him instead of trading - regardless of Darnold. 

Honestly, there is no real wrong answer.

We could trade back with NE or CHI, or we could grab Pitts, or Sewell, or Lance, or pretty much anything...

I think we are in a HELL of a good position no matter what road we take (unless its something drastic like moving up to #1 to draft a punter LOL) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Shocker said:

This is way too rich for Chicago to move up.  Jeez

Like 8 for 20 and they send us a second and third and something next year.  Maybe a 2.  At most.

Then you tell them to stick it and trade with someone else or get a real stud at 8.  We would hold the cards not them. We don't have to trade with anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, classics said:

So I'm new to all this and really don't get into all the trading what ifs, but if Lance is there at 8, wouldn't you at least think about taking him instead of trading - regardless of Darnold. 

Why. He isn't a better athlete than Darnold and he is a project. Darnold is an experienced veteran who is eager to redeem himself. I didn't see signs he was David Carred or going to be a flop. He played hard and didn't give up despite no talent around him and a poor defense that gave up 29 points a game or 26  out of 32. Their offensive output was abysmal at 15 points a game the worse in the league.  He surely didn't look good but who would have? Who had a worse supporting cast than the Jets. Jacksonville maybe. 

I can see those that love Trevor or Wilson but Lance and Fields have question marks. They might be great but we can pick a tackle or corner who we know will be great as they might be the best player at their position and not the 4th or 5th best quarterback prospect.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, classics said:

So I'm new to all this and really don't get into all the trading what ifs, but if Lance is there at 8, wouldn't you at least think about taking him instead of trading - regardless of Darnold. 

You pass on Lance...he isn’t an NFL QB

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tanking in the NFL isn’t really a thing and anybody wanting to bring the rigged lottery to the NFL has an ulterior motive.
    • I understand where you're coming from, but we need another safety IMHO. Other positions, especially on defense, dont have ideal depth, but to me at least S is the one position we can't stand pat at even when thinking about the future
    • 100%. Nick Scott was awful last year. Like, even for a franchise that hasn't historically invested in that position, it stood out for how awful it was. If he sees meaningful snaps at S again we're cooked.  Maybe he has value for ST, but I certainly hope we can upgrade. Jordan Fuller, who was by all accounts an Evero guy, was almost as bad. Xavier Woods was bad, but not complete garbage. Still did not want him back. Those 3 guys seriously may have been the worst S group in the NFL. And they all were brought in, especially Fuller, as good fits for this system. Everyone knocks the defensive line, and they deserve a lot of blame, too, but so, so many times our safeties inability to tackle let 4-5 yard runs turn into 10+. And it happened over and over and over again if you watch the film. Honestly, Demani Richardson was the only S by the end of the year I remember making positive plays. I have no issue with Richardson being in the mix and/or competing to be a starter, but we still need another S desperately IMHO who has actually played meaningful snaps in the NFL. The only caveat/excuse for our secondary was the fact our pass rush was nonexistent for large stretches last year. Maybe that helps with coverage, but I dont see how that makes any of these guys better at tackling.  I know it somewhat feels like piling on at this point, but I feel 100% confident in saying this was the worst tackling team in franchise history. The 70ish yard pass play we gave up to Jamarr Chase where he ran through and past everyone in the secondary has to be up there in terms of most embarrassing plays I've ever seen. I can't imagine how embarrassed Kuechly must have been watching from the booth... I think bringing back Evero was a mistake, but for a team that has had nothing but change over the past 5 years, I'm willing to see this through. I definitely think we added significantly to the floor of this defense with the additions we made. I dont think Evero has any further excuses if he cant field a unit that can at least somewhat hold their own. Fixing the safety play is going to be a big part of that.
×
×
  • Create New...