Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's 2021 Mock Draft


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, maybe this will help.

There were guys Tepper wanted for the GM job, including guys that nobody else was interviewing (seriously, Brandt Tillis?) and there were guys that Matt Rhule wanted for the GM job.

None of Tepper's guys even made it to the second round. Rhule won that debate.

I'd call that a reason for hope.

And here you were....almost talking me into hoping that Tepper had rounded a corner.

Man...black cat and all...we are snakebitten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

Sewell > Horn > Waddle > Slater 
Is how I understand it 

People are talking about how deep CB is---and it is. 

How deep is CB1?   I count 2 or 3.  Full stop.  We need CB1 here, and Verge has stated it that way----accurately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

People are talking about how deep CB is---and it is. 

How deep is CB1?   I count 2 or 3.  Full stop.  We need CB1 here, and Verge has stated it that way----accurately.

CB1 is probably Horn, Surtain, Newsome, and Farley. That's it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Verge said:

We are also very high on Farley. Just a matter of where you take him with the injury.

He was my favorite coming in--guessing that he is the pick if we trade back with NE or WFT.  I don't really like Darrisaw as much the more I watch him, so I am hoping CB 1 in round 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He was my favorite coming in--guessing that he is the pick if we trade back with NE or WFT.  I don't really like Darrisaw as much the more I watch him, so I am hoping CB 1 in round 1

I need to know how much weight Farley was pulling when f’d up his back 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nina King continues to run circles around the rest of college basketball. She's been ahead of the curve on everything, and is the biggest reason for Duke's success post-K IMO. I think Scheyer is great at many things, but Duke went into the NIL era 100% ready whereas everyone else was playing catchup. 
    • Happy they won convincingly instead of letting them hang around. Montreal is cooked, and rather than play hockey, they've decided to take some really cheap shots at guys. I get a player may feel a need to set the tone, and I understand how that works. But to 2-hand cross check someone intentionally in the face, to have a guy down on the ice and put his head into the ice with a stick, to just start punching anyone who gets within arm's reach- that's not setting the tone. That is nothing short of playing dirty.  That said, the Canes.... oh boy. They could have run this score to 6-0 with half a power play. It's embarrassing how bad the PP is. If the Canes go to the Cup finals against a team who scores at least 1 goal per game on the PP, they'll lose the close games because of the lack of results on the PP. 
    • Because he knows they are winning the cup. And I fully support his decision. 
×
×
  • Create New...