Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The “Deep OT class” may not be as deep at LT in scouts eyes

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Every LT in that second tier after Sewell/Slater has  major concerns

Yea of course a couple/few maaayy become LT down the road, but 2day, there maybe 3 players that are day one starting LT. Ive even seen many are calling Darrisaw a RT only too. Panthers need a LT, not RT(welllll resvist this next year...) There are 10x the RT than LT in this years draft. 

I mean if Moton will only play for 20+ million, draft his replacement form that deep group too. LOL at Motons price dream....

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, Basbear said:

Yea of course a couple maaayy become LT down the road, but 2day, there maybe 3 players that are  day one starting LT. Ive even seen many are calling Darrisaw a RT only too. Panthers need a LT, not RT(welllll resvist this next year...) There are 10x the RT than LT in this years draft. 

I mean if Moton will only play for 20+ million, draft his replacement form that deep group too. LOL at Motons price dream....

In terms of team needs, this draft is custom crafted for us and where we pick.  Go LT at 8, another oline in the 2nd, safety in the 3rd.  Lets not get cute and try and trade down.  Keep building the team and build the damn line

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

In terms of team needs, this draft is custom crafted for us and where we pick.  Go LT at 8, another oline in the 2nd, safety in the 3rd.  Lets not get cute and try and trade down.  Keep building the team and build the damn line

 

3 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

Sewell and Slater for sure, with Darrisaw being a possibility in the 1st round. The rest of the tackles in rounds 1 and 2 are RT in my opinion. 

After that, I could possibly see Brady Christensen and James Hudson becoming good LT's with the proper coaching. 

Thats what Ive been saying about the draft for the panthers.

The only way to fill that HUGE LT hole is at 8.

Those 2nd-5th round LT are not ready, they may not be ready for the whole year.

Pray Sewell is there and Fritterer makes the easiest pick in panther history. 

Its a near must the 8 needs to be used on Sewell/Slater/Darrisaw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

I don't know. If they thought he could play LT why didn't they move him there last year?

I mean we did go to our 4th option at one point but we never moved Moten there. 

I had that same thought and it could be a matter of concern since they didn't make the RT/LT switch last year.

However, if Moton expects to be paid LT money he better be able to play the position if called on.

Edited by KatsAzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

I don't know. If they thought he could play LT why didn't they move him there last year?

I mean we did go to our 4th option at one point but we never moved Moten there. 

 

4 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

I had that same thought and it could be a matter of concern since they didn't make the RT/LT switch last year.

However, if Morton expects to be paid LT money he better be able to play the position if called on.

Captain hindsight reporting, should have moved Moton to LT, let Dwilliams play RT. Done. Now you solved the OTs for the next 10 with two young studs.

Theres something fishy going on with Moton and LT, cause for yearS they needed a LT and Moton remained at RT. very strange.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Trainwreck said:

LT: Sewell, Eichenberg, Jenkins, Mayfield, Little

RT: Darrisaw, Radunz, Cosmi, Christensen, Carman, Alaric

G: Slater, Leatherwood, Hudson

 

LT- Sewell

Maybe LT- everyone else.

Hes about the only true LT, others have much to overcome. Ive seen many list Jenkins(check his arms) as a OG....Mayfield may fall out of the 2nd too and hes a firm RT in many eyes.

I think Eichenberg is a "future" LT, he got the profile, just needs time. No way Id trust him week one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Friday camp news and notes

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • TD alt
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By TD alt · Posted

      You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • pantherclaw
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...