Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots have talked to the Panthers about a draft day trade


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Jared Patterson said:

So are we def trading out no matter Lance or Fields being there? That seems to be the case according to Josh Klein. Also, hearing we love Fields??? I think we are keeping all options open and doing a good job of not letting much leak. I still feel like we could literally go anywhere. 

Josh Klein has better inside info than Joe Person.

I honestly think we trade out no matter who is available at #8 it seems like the number one objective this year is to acquire more picks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Italianpantherfan said:

This years first and 2nd and next years first I’d move back but I feel bellichick will try to pull a fast one on us 

Same, anything but a first and second would be a fleecing

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As if letting the Patriots of all fuging teams get a franchise quarterback wasn’t bad enough, if we really seek Stephon Gilmore as compensation in this potential trade it would be mind-blowingly dumb. He’s like 30 it would reek of another short sighted move trying to go all in for some playoff run in what was supposed to be year two of a rebuild.

We should only be seeking picks picks and more picks. All negotiations start with their 2022 first.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

As if letting the Patriots of all fuging teams get a franchise quarterback wasn’t bad enough, if we really seek Stephon Gilmore as compensation in this potential trade it would be mind-blowingly dumb. He’s like 30 it would reek of another short sighted move trying to go all in for some playoff run in what was supposed to be year two of a rebuild.

We should only be seeking picks picks and more picks. All negotiations start with their 2022 first.

I know I’m reaching but if it’s the Pats I wouldn’t take any less than their 2022 and 2023 first round picks in the package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

As if letting the Patriots of all fuging teams get a franchise quarterback wasn’t bad enough, if we really seek Stephon Gilmore as compensation in this potential trade it would be mind-blowingly dumb. He’s like 30 it would reek of another short sighted move trying to go all in for some playoff run in what was supposed to be year two of a rebuild.

This post reminds me of when the Hornets signed Big Al and cut short their rebuild a few years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...