Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy B to the Broncos for a 6th!


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I am guessing we move back in the draft at some point (probably round 1) and get the other 2 picks (2022) covered. 

Man, I need to crank out another mock now we another pick! A second selection at corner or picking a third O-lineman. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joemac said:

Cool story bro

Best part of the next season is dumb fugs like you can't go "NOOOO HURNEEYYYY WHYYYYY" for every loss the Panthers have. You'll have to either find another scapegoat (most likely because you're fuging stupid, and have a hard time thinking for yourself) or actually have an informed opinion.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SmartyHurney4 said:

Best part of the next season is dumb fugs like you can't go "NOOOO HURNEEYYYY WHYYYYY" for every loss the Panthers have. You'll have to either find another scapegoat (most likely because you're fuging stupid, and have a hard time thinking for yourself) or actually have an informed opinion.

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My optimistic trade back plan...

 

Panthers get: Stephon Gilmore / #46 / 2022 2nd rounder

Patriots get: #8 (QB)

then....

Panthers get: #41 / #72

Lions get: Stephon Gilmore / #113 / #222

 

Panthers would be trading #8, a 4th, and a 6th for #15, two 2nds, a 3rd, and a 2022 2nd.

Now someone tell me we can possibly manipulate the Lions and Patriots like that instead of them making the deal themselves. Ha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't reading 22 pages to see if this had been mentioned, but this is a HIGH 6th rounder for Teddy.  We lost a comp pick 6th for Darnold.  This is essentially like a comp 5th rounder as only 6 teams pick ahead of us at the top of the round compared to next to last in the comp section of the round.  It's a difference of like 35 selections, which is equivalent to an entire round.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Two weeks ago the Huddle said Teddy’s contract was untradeable. We got something for Teddy, this is a win. 

FIFY.  I wasn't one of them, by the way, and I have the receipts to prove it.  While Teddy failed our expectations, he is a legit backup.  Chances were if we let him go for peanuts, someone would bite.  Denver was the likely choice and they made it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Two weeks ago Albert Breer said Teddy’s contract was untradeable. We got something for Teddy, this is a win. 

It was great we got a return, but Breer was right to a degree. We had to eat most of the contract for this to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

FIFY.  I wasn't one of them, by the way, and I have the receipts to prove it.  While Teddy failed our expectations, he is a legit backup.  Chances were if we let him go for peanuts, someone would bite.  Denver was the likely choice and they made it happen.

His contract WAS untradeable - Teddy had to restructure/adjust compensation by cancelling the 3rd year and Carolina still had to eat money to make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KSpan said:

His contract WAS untradeable - Teddy had to restructure/adjust compensation by cancelling the 3rd year and Carolina still had to eat money to make it happen.

Guess what?  A re-work was always an option and had been discussed in that thread several times, but people just thought Teddy sucked too bad to be traded.  It wasn't the contract, but their personal bias about Teddy that they thought made him untradedable.  Contracts are not set in stone.

Point being, Teddy is gone and the contract wasn't a major obstacle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...