Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints might be trading ahead of us


Tbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

Totally disagree...they want a QB...let them give up a bunch to get ahead of us...the only QB I really like is Lawrence....and maybe Jones 

I disagree.  I dont think Payton needs a first round QB, nor does he want one.  They looked pretty effing good with a bucktoothed, super-powered The Golden Calf of Bristol despite his limitations.  They are stockpiling talent and they're draft record over the last few years should be the envy of the league.  So whatever they're gonna do, it's gonna have more of a negative effect on us than it will them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Boy I hope so. I'm mentally preparing for Pitts.

I wouldn't be mad at Pitts, but I have grown to think CB is a bigger priority.  My personal, current board is

1) Fields/Lance

2) Sewell

3) Horn/Surtain with the preference being Horn.

I saw Verge's blurb about us being interested in Farley after Horn, and made no mention of Surtain, but Farley's back issues scare the hell out of me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chaos said:

We've been thinking that since back when fat Alice was stinking up this joint.

I remember. Karma can be very, very slow. Or she might just have a really, really big bag to fill for them. Sooner or later that swamp juju they've been relying on will extract its price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I wouldn't be mad at Pitts, but I have grown to think CB is a bigger priority.  My personal, current board is

1) Fields/Lance

2) Sewell

3) Horn/Surtain with the preference being Horn.

I saw Verge's blurb about us being interested in Farley after Horn, and made no mention of Surtain, but Farley's back issues scare the hell out of me.

I meant Pitts to Atlanta 😔

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Whatever they do, it's gonna screw us.  With them taking whoever they get, and the Falcons taking Lance that win against Washington really fuged us.  No matter what we get at 8, both of them got better and did so ahead of us.

This will really be the test of how good of a coach Rhule is.

 

How come nobody complains about that pesky 3 game win streak when they harp on that WFT win? Are they somehow different?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

 

How come nobody complains about that pesky 3 game win streak when they harp on that WFT win? Are they somehow different?

Yes, because we still were in contention at that point and Teddy hadn't shown how horribly inept he was at that point.  At Washington, the season was over, qe were out of contention, most everyone was already over Teddy and ready to move on, and we literally had nothing to gain by winning that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
    • Good response. In reference to your second paragraph, many Huddlers are just haters when it comes to certain people. 
×
×
  • Create New...