Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints might be trading ahead of us


Tbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

Totally disagree...they want a QB...let them give up a bunch to get ahead of us...the only QB I really like is Lawrence....and maybe Jones 

I disagree.  I dont think Payton needs a first round QB, nor does he want one.  They looked pretty effing good with a bucktoothed, super-powered The Golden Calf of Bristol despite his limitations.  They are stockpiling talent and they're draft record over the last few years should be the envy of the league.  So whatever they're gonna do, it's gonna have more of a negative effect on us than it will them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Boy I hope so. I'm mentally preparing for Pitts.

I wouldn't be mad at Pitts, but I have grown to think CB is a bigger priority.  My personal, current board is

1) Fields/Lance

2) Sewell

3) Horn/Surtain with the preference being Horn.

I saw Verge's blurb about us being interested in Farley after Horn, and made no mention of Surtain, but Farley's back issues scare the hell out of me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chaos said:

We've been thinking that since back when fat Alice was stinking up this joint.

I remember. Karma can be very, very slow. Or she might just have a really, really big bag to fill for them. Sooner or later that swamp juju they've been relying on will extract its price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I wouldn't be mad at Pitts, but I have grown to think CB is a bigger priority.  My personal, current board is

1) Fields/Lance

2) Sewell

3) Horn/Surtain with the preference being Horn.

I saw Verge's blurb about us being interested in Farley after Horn, and made no mention of Surtain, but Farley's back issues scare the hell out of me.

I meant Pitts to Atlanta 😔

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Whatever they do, it's gonna screw us.  With them taking whoever they get, and the Falcons taking Lance that win against Washington really fuged us.  No matter what we get at 8, both of them got better and did so ahead of us.

This will really be the test of how good of a coach Rhule is.

 

How come nobody complains about that pesky 3 game win streak when they harp on that WFT win? Are they somehow different?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

 

How come nobody complains about that pesky 3 game win streak when they harp on that WFT win? Are they somehow different?

Yes, because we still were in contention at that point and Teddy hadn't shown how horribly inept he was at that point.  At Washington, the season was over, qe were out of contention, most everyone was already over Teddy and ready to move on, and we literally had nothing to gain by winning that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...