Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 3(b) - Carolina Panthers Select Notre Dame TE Tommy Tremble


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Trainwreck said:

Someone compared him to George Kittle during the pick. He’s exactly that. Go look at Kittle’s stats in college. 

yeah, because Kittle was a raw talent...and he rapidly developed when he went into the NFL. 

Notre Dame kid still has to develop in the pass game.   And Kittle was a rocket ship in terms of his growth. 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we heard that the new in thing is positional flexibility. He will get RB, TE, H-back looks. He is a work in progress as a reliable bpass catcher. Really good athlete. Nasty run blocker (got to love that). Now that sounds like a guy I liked I'm Washington a few years ago: Chris Cooley, another 3rd rounder people screamed was a terrible pick. now Cooley had a lot more production but was a small school guy.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chbright said:

So we heard that the new in thing is positional flexibility. He will get RB, TE, H-back looks. He is a work in progress as a reliable bpass catcher. Really good athlete. Nasty run blocker (got to love that). Now that sounds like a guy I liked I'm Washington a few years ago: Chris Cooley, another 3rd rounder people screamed was a terrible pick. now Cooley had a lot more production but was a small school guy.

 

When you figure that you want at least 90% of the balls going to CMC and not a TE his hands are not really a concern. He's going to get open simply because the defense won't be giving him much attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

Yeah just watched that and got excited. Not sure why they are questioning his hands. Still highlights are exactly that.

Oh of course.

I watched the cut-up of him v. Boston College and the dude just wasn't targeted. Blocked a few guys into oblivion though.

Obviously had to go and find out whether he had a highlights tape of him catching the ball and, yep. Shows strong hands - so it must just have been a bad QB / stacked TE room thing 'cos he can play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

Oh of course.

I watched the cut-up of him v. Boston College and the dude just wasn't targeted. Blocked a few guys into oblivion though.

Obviously had to go and find out whether he had a highlights tape of him catching the ball and, yep. Shows strong hands - so it must just have been a bad QB / stacked TE room thing 'cos he can play. 

Also as I said before. Defenses won't really be targeting him with CMC on the field. Could be a match up problem. I really like the picks so far sans Horn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

His hands are fine:

 

He had a 12.5% drop rate.  That’s bad.  And he largely was open....because he was the designated blocking TE. 

I mean he has great upside.  His blocking alone makes him better than Ian Thomas.  But he most definitely was bad route runner with bad hands vs the other two TEs Notre Dame did use as pass catchers 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

He had a 12.5% drop rate.  That’s bad.  And he largely was open....because he was the designated blocking TE. 

I mean he has great upside.  His blocking alone makes him better than Ian Thomas.  But he most definitely was bad route runner with bad hands vs the other two other TEs Notre Dame did use as pass catchers 

 

Careful, you might get pooed for stating unpleasant facts about one of our draft picks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

He had a 12.5% drop rate.  That’s bad.  And he largely was open....because he was the designated blocking TE. 

I mean he has great upside.  His blocking alone makes him better than Ian Thomas.  But he most definitely was bad route runner with bad hands vs the other two TEs Notre Dame did use as pass catchers 

 

Yeah thats pretty bad but honestly his true role is at fullback. He really doesn't have much tape on him but as you said ND avoided using him as s Receiving target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

Yeah thats pretty bad but honestly his true role is at fullback. He really doesn't have much tape on him but as you said ND avoided using him as s Receiving target.

I like the pick.   Best blocker at TE in the draft.  That ain’t sexy but we could use the help up front in Brady’s scheme. 

We can develop him too.  He is a good athlete.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

After watching film I can’t wait to see him knock someone’s head off.  
 

I think he is one of my favorite picks so far.  CMC will love him. 
 

Hopefully he can grow as a pass catching weapon.  He is only 20. 

He is really good in the short pass game too in the middle of the field.  Quick hitter to the WR and he comes in lays defenders out.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...