Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DaQuan Jones on The Golden Calf of Bristol


Smithers
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, it is hilarious to see the Jags hire a dude that was known to bolt when things got stressful(or rather the NCAA heat got too much). 

This is the Saban hire all over again. He may well quit during the season.

Saban is just a great college coach.   His approach IMO just works better there.  But Saban doesn't create clusterfugs in house.  That's Urban's thing.  Urban might of won in college (at universities that could pull in and give him insane talent edges).... but he left them all in a mess.   No reason to think this is any different.  And he is off to a predictable start.  Young lockerroom and immediately brings in a circus clown.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

Nothing about it works IMO.   Nothing about it makes any sense. 

Urban remains a horrible hire and it will predictably end horribly.   I firmly believe what Urban will do is get Tim into the endzone.....and then people will act like that is something.

The Golden Calf of Bristol isn't a TE.  The Golden Calf of Bristol isn't a RB.   He isn't even in the ballpark in terms of being an actual RB as the Jags #3 tailback.   The Golden Calf of Bristol only works as a wildcat QB and even that is debatable at this stage.   Urban just can't come out and say that.    So the talk is well, maybe we will have him play something else. 

In a max of 3 years, Urban will have to go take time off from football to see about his health.   

Yeah, I don't see him working out at the NFL level.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

Saban is just a great college coach.   His approach IMO just works better there.  But Saban doesn't create clusterfugs in house.  That's Urban's thing.  Urban might of won in college (at universities that could pull in and give him insane talent edges).... but he left them all in a mess.   No reason to think this is any different.  And he is off to a predictable start.  Young lockerroom and immediately brings in a circus clown.

 

That's actually unfair. Urban had a lot more success at the lower levels of college football than Saban did. Honestly, Urban has always proven to be successful at every stop. The overwhelming bulk of Saban's success has been at football factory traditional powers. 

That's part of the reason he was such a failure at the Dolphons, IMO. He legitimately isn't an elite coach. It's a lot easier to be successful with an ultimated recruiting budget and staff budget. 

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CRA said:

he hasn't touched a football field in 8 years.   And he has never played TE.  That isn't going to work. 

I fully believe Urban is going to take Trevor off the field and insert The Golden Calf of Bristol short yardage package on offense.    Which is stupid, yet predictable. 

True, but FWIW, he was still playing baseball, got to believe he was forced to stay in shape.  If he tries the taysom hill approach, he'll be trash, if they use him as a TE/FB/WR hybrid, I think he could be alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Carolina Cajun said:

True, but FWIW, he was still playing baseball, got to believe he was forced to stay in shape.  If he tries the taysom hill approach, he'll be trash, if they use him as a TE/FB/WR hybrid, I think he could be alright.

He isn't likely to be alright because he is going to be learning new positions in his mid-30's. Had he been making this switch when he was drafted, we might be looking at him as an elite player winding down a successful career, rather than a sideshow career buoyed by media hype.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

That's actually unfair. Urban had a lot more success at the lower levels of college football than Saban did. Honestly, Saban has always proven to be successful at every stop. The overwhelming bulk of Saban's success has been at football factory traditional powers. 

That's part of the reason he was such a failure at the Dolphons, IMO. He legitimately isn't an elite coach. It's a lot easier to be successful with an ultimated recruiting budget and staff budget. 

I mean, he went 9-7 in his first season there.  6-10 in the second.  Obviously not great, but they weren't TERRIBLE, they just didn't have a QB.  I think Saban could have had success if he stuck it out, but I do agree he's a much better college coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mage said:

I mean, he went 9-7 in his first season there.  6-10 in the second.  Obviously not great, but they weren't TERRIBLE, they just didn't have a QB.  I think Saban could have had success if he stuck it out, but I do agree he's a much better college coach.

I don't think he would have has sustained success. His attitude and style of coaching is more likely to be successful in college than the NFL. Guys with that style(like Tom Coughlin) have a limit on how long the players can stand them. Once the losing starts, all that military dictatorship style coaching starts to wear thin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think he would have has sustained success. His attitude and style of coaching is more likely to be successful in college than the NFL. Guys with that style(like Tom Coughlin) have a limit on how long the players can stand them. Once the losing starts, all that military dictatorship style coaching starts to wear thin.

Our current head coach considers both Coughlin and Parcells to be mentors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think he would have has sustained success. His attitude and style of coaching is more likely to be successful in college than the NFL. Guys with that style(like Tom Coughlin) have a limit on how long the players can stand them. Once the losing starts, all that military dictatorship style coaching starts to wear thin.

I mean Coughlin won 2 Super Bowls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That's actually unfair. Urban had a lot more success at the lower levels of college football than Saban did. Honestly, Urban has always proven to be successful at every stop. The overwhelming bulk of Saban's success has been at football factory traditional powers. 

That's part of the reason he was such a failure at the Dolphons, IMO. He legitimately isn't an elite coach. It's a lot easier to be successful with an ultimated recruiting budget and staff budget. 

If he stayed at those other schools for more than 1 or 2 years.....I suspect there would have been issues there too.

But yeah, his gimmicky college offense does work.  No doubt about it. 

The major Urban knock is the environments he creates and problems. 

Saban and Dabo have created elite and long term programs and cultures.   I don't consider them elite scheme and X and O guys.   I consider them good big picture leaders for college programs.   I mean they both get their hate and some of it is just.  That wasn't Urban though.  I don't put him with those type college coaches. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He seems to be more of a players coach than either of those guys. TBD how it all works out.

Couple of articles that have been written about him portray him as a hardass to both players and staff alike.

Remember he stopped practice and jumped all over guys that were being lazy at the Senior Bowl.

Edit: Found the discussion we had on it a while back (The Wrath of Rhule)

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...