Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Want a pro baseball team?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

As an Oakland A's fan (hence the name): 

Cbs No GIF by HULU

Of course this is one of the oldest tricks in the book:  The "Threaten to move your sports team to another city if you don't get a new stadium." ploy.

Oakland has faced this situation on multiple occasions in the past.  Let's see if they handle it any better this time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Of course this is one of the oldest tricks in the book:  The "Threaten to move your sports team to another city if you don't get a new stadium." ploy.

Oakland has faced this situation on multiple occasions in the past.  Let's see if they handle it any better this time.

 

They've already allowed two teams to leave.

The A's want to finance their own waterfront ballpark, but the City aren't allowing them to build it where they want to. It's almost like they don't want pro sports in the city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

They've already allowed two teams to leave.

The A's want to finance their own waterfront ballpark, but the City aren't allowing them to build it where they want to. It's almost like they don't want pro sports in the city.

Wow, that's a bit different, a team that wants to pay for their own ballpark.

What is the city's reason for not supporting the A's chosen location?

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Wow, that's a bit different, a team that wants to pay for their own ballpark.

What is the city's reason for not supporting the A's chosen location?

As I understand it - money. I don't know the area well (I've visited Oakland, but I'm not a city planner 🤣) but I think the city are worried about the required transport links to the new stadium, which is like 6 miles away from the Coliseum (which has great transport links). 

 

Edited by OldhamA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

As I understand it - money. I don't know the area well (I've visited Oakland, but I'm not a city planner 🤣) but I think the city are worried about the required transport links to the new stadium, which is like 6 miles away from the Coliseum (which has great transport links). 

 

Did a quick search and it appears the city could be on the hook for about 855 million in land development costs.  It also appears that staying in Oakland is still the teams preferred outcome, but if they have to leave Las Vegas is likely their destination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Did a quick search and it appears the city could be on the hook for about 855 million in land development costs.  It also appears that staying in Oakland is still the teams preferred outcome, but if they have to leave Las Vegas is likely their destination.

As I said, it's money - there's always going to be a cost involved for the city when building a new stadium.

Unfortunately Oakland has always considered the A's a burden - but this is the same city council that let the Raiders and the Golden State Warriors walk, so I'm not entirely sure they want pro sports in their city.

Las Vegas seems like an awful option. Portland is a nothing-burger of a place. Who knows where they'll go - but I do think they'll leave now, this has been rolling on for two decades. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

How far afield from these two metro centers are we expected to go in order to justify our positions for MLB?  The larger the geographic area required, the weaker the case for a team becomes.  Population density is important.  Per capita the Charlotte MSA has gained more people during the last decade than the Raleigh MSA according to the folks at Chapel Hill (2020).  

Having said that, I believe either area could be attractive to a MLB team.  I might even favor RD due to the lack of professional competition beyond hockey.  On the other hand, there are a ton of collegiate sports in the area that they'd have to compete with for consumer dollars.   

  

Baseball makes more sense in a larger metro area.  Games are daily and usually in the afternoon after work, so if in a large metro area people can just go after or during work.  

Football can be more regional because its once a week on a day most don't work so people can come from all over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Wow, that's a bit different, a team that wants to pay for their own ballpark.

What is the city's reason for not supporting the A's chosen location?

I would assume that if the team wants to pay, then the city doesn’t get to raise food and beverage taxes to justify the public funds used on a Baseball stadium.

Then again they could just be really bad at negotiating?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, joande said:

Your newspaper:

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/databases/article251183669.html

For first time, Wake County tops Mecklenburg County in estimated NC population

North Carolina has a new population leader.

Mecklenburg County is no longer the state’s most populous county, new U.S. Census Bureau estimates show.

After years of creeping up on Mecklenburg, Wake County, which includes Raleigh, finally overtook it — 1.13 million to 1.12 million.

The change came after Wake grew by 1.75% from 2019-20 and Mecklenburg grew by 1.41%, according to annual population estimates released Tuesday. The census bureau has yet to release an official population count, which will be detailed in the 2020 Census.

Look up MSAs and then revisit this argument.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Of course this is one of the oldest tricks in the book:  The "Threaten to move your sports team to another city if you don't get a new stadium." ploy.

With the support of Major League Baseball in this case.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I think it can be done as long as it's an AL team and not an NL team. 

this is a good point. but also the braves have a stronghold and im not sure if the eastern part of NC pulls for Nats. I'm a Phillies fan though. But this would be hard market to crack, and honestly Oakland will move to Nashville.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Squirrel said:

They was trying to do that when the Twins was thinking of moving. They wanted to put a stadium in Kernersville at the time in between winston salem and Greensboro. 

I think it came down to a $0.02 increase in sales tax for a stadium in K Vegas, which of course was voted down. Greensboro actually has a history with baseball, the Yankees minor league team was here when Jeter was coming up. And our old stadium was in Bull Durham for the "rain out" scene...so we had that going for us. We also had the Hurricanes here until RAL stole them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AviationMX said:

I think it came down to a $0.02 increase in sales tax for a stadium in K Vegas, which of course was voted down. Greensboro actually has a history with baseball, the Yankees minor league team was here when Jeter was coming up. And our old stadium was in Bull Durham for the "rain out" scene...so we had that going for us. We also had the Hurricanes here until RAL stole them.

Raleigh did not steal the Hurricanes, they just played there in

 

22 hours ago, MikeD83 said:

The Charlotte metro area still has nearly 500,000 more people in it than the Raleigh metro. Raleigh area is growing faster though and will likely catch up in another decade or so. 

 Greensboro for the first two years until the arena was built and ready. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...