Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comfortable in leadership


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't see them having that kind of dynamic.

When you watch the video of the two of them together, it looks like a really good working relationship.

Fitterer definitely ran the draft.

 

interesting take.  

In the video, he did seem to have a really good relationship with Rhule.

We noted his apparent nervousness in his introductory (?) presser, but at the start of the video you mentioned, it showed at the beginning Tepper telling him "you're in charge" or something to that effect.

I think Fitt took that as a vote of confidence, but I wonder if Tepper needed him to feel that.  I mean when you're dealing with personalities as strong as David Tepper and Matt Rhule, I'd be damn nervous too.

In the end, I think he was pretty nervous but settled in as he went through his process during the draft...."trust the board."

And afterword, he was given a lot of praise for his work.

Now, the players we chose have to pan out.  Lot of injury concerns,  lot of off the field concerns, but we got a haul of players that Matt likes, willing to learn, coachable, and fit the mold of the team he's trying to build.

We'll see, but I do feel good about most of these guys.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PandaMan said:

He seems a bit nervous in front of the microphone, but he’s been around the NFL for a long time and has worked his way up.  The Camp Confidential footage of the war room really showed him in his element.  I wanted the guy from SF but I like most of what he’s done so far.

I would always rather have substance than style. Lot of guys sound great but suck at the job. Glad he actually knows his stuff

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

I would always rather have substance than style. Lot of guys sound great but suck at the job. Glad he actually knows his stuff

No doubt.  Results over sound bites any day.  The way they navigated the draft was quite impressive.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me the success of the draft will be determined by how many of the 12 guys make the roster. If a bunch do and provide depth then awesome. If we kept trading down to get picks that don't make the team then the strategy of quantity over quality was not a good one. In either case you do have to give the FO props for still finding good value throughout the draft. There is a good chance many of these guys make the 53 or at least the practice squad. Another way to look at the depth of our draft will be to see how many guys get poached off our practice squad from the guys we drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Thats a GREAT get. The Seahawks top scout. Mr. Scott, do you know if Jeff Morrow is still staying around? I love his experience.

Morrow is reported to be taking a reduced role. Joe Person described it as "a senior advisory role on the college scouting side". 

Despite his title (Executive Director of Player Personnel) Morrow was basically Director of College Scouting for the last few years. But the Panthers just gave that job and title to Washington scout Cole Spencer.

In the NFL, moves like this frequently precede someone retiring. Makes me wonder if Morrow is going to spend a year helping Spencer get to know the scouting director job and then retire.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

...there's something I've noticed about new GM Scott Fitterer.

He seems really comfortable with being in charge.

A lot of new GMs have a little trouble with the transition from being one of the assistants in charge of whatever to being the guy in control of everything. That just doesn't seem to be the case with Fitt.

 

Who does he report to?  Any confirmation yet from inside on that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...