Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers to retire?


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Fox007 said:

Yea everytime I come back here I'm reminded of just how much of a backwater for football discussion this place is lol. He then goes on to mention poo that the best organizations do...you know like...having only 2 QBs in the last 30 years. Only find that on the best teams.

Doing the same thing with Rodgers they did with Favre and now these yokels who only watch First Take just run with whatever they are told on there about how the Packers are "mismanaging" lol. Hell if anything the NFL will be more than willing to triple down to make sure the league doesn't end up like the NBA, much less a 1 ring having Diva of a QB from GB gonna be runnin poo. But honestly Rodgers hates the media and loves trolling them, so who knows.

It's more for anything non Panthers related it seems... we're out here trying to say a division where the #2 team has more winning seasons than anyone in our division since our inception (which is already a generous sample, because the teams in our division's history pre-1995 is awful) is weaker than the NFC East sans NE lol

Edited by beo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Is English a second language for you? You sure do struggle with it.

 

Oh look, it's the grammar police. You lose on merits. So your recourse is this? lol

 

Face it dude. Your insults are as lame as your arguments. Maybe there are some 5th graders around you can practice on. Then come back and try again. It's okay, I'll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this a yearly cycle?

1) Rodgers threatens to quit and has a dramatic dispute that ends just in time for training camp.

2) Packers look pretty bad first two games

3) Packers look unstoppable and are SuperBowl favorites

4) Packers lose the NFC Championship.

Rinse and repeat......

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Oh look, it's the grammar police. You lose on merits. So your recourse is this? lol

 

Face it dude. Your insults are as lame as your arguments. Maybe there are some 5th graders around you can practice on. Then come back and try again. It's okay, I'll wait.

It's just that you don't see to have a good grasp of the English language. You clearly misinterpreted my last post that was very easy to read. English is either a second language or... well, I hope English is a second language.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

That's what happens when you have Stockholders. Profits over glory.

Packers "stockholders" are that in name only...they do not, nor have they ever shared in any "profits".

In fact, the franchise operates under a not-for-profit corporate structure and is the only NFL for which annual financial statements/information is available to the general public...

...some starter reading here if you're interested: 

https://shareholder.broadridge.com/pdf/gbp/green-bay-packers-2020-annual-report.pdf

 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This.  He knows where the seam is about to open, cuts, and accelerates hard. He’s slippery and tacklers always seem to be taking awkward angles to get to him. No dancing. Runs low and powerful. Almost never goes backwards for a loss. We’ve rarely had the guy who bounces off of tacklers. It’s nice seeing another one. 
    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
    • Same thing I first thought but then I saw it was against Jacksonville and took about half a second of playing to know. I was at that game.  I can't tell you my level of excitement when I saw it was Delhomme instead of Peete who came out for the 2nd half. Delhomme has and will probably always be my favorite Panther.
×
×
  • Create New...