Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers to retire?


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Fox007 said:

Yea everytime I come back here I'm reminded of just how much of a backwater for football discussion this place is lol. He then goes on to mention poo that the best organizations do...you know like...having only 2 QBs in the last 30 years. Only find that on the best teams.

Doing the same thing with Rodgers they did with Favre and now these yokels who only watch First Take just run with whatever they are told on there about how the Packers are "mismanaging" lol. Hell if anything the NFL will be more than willing to triple down to make sure the league doesn't end up like the NBA, much less a 1 ring having Diva of a QB from GB gonna be runnin poo. But honestly Rodgers hates the media and loves trolling them, so who knows.

It's more for anything non Panthers related it seems... we're out here trying to say a division where the #2 team has more winning seasons than anyone in our division since our inception (which is already a generous sample, because the teams in our division's history pre-1995 is awful) is weaker than the NFC East sans NE lol

Edited by beo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Is English a second language for you? You sure do struggle with it.

 

Oh look, it's the grammar police. You lose on merits. So your recourse is this? lol

 

Face it dude. Your insults are as lame as your arguments. Maybe there are some 5th graders around you can practice on. Then come back and try again. It's okay, I'll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this a yearly cycle?

1) Rodgers threatens to quit and has a dramatic dispute that ends just in time for training camp.

2) Packers look pretty bad first two games

3) Packers look unstoppable and are SuperBowl favorites

4) Packers lose the NFC Championship.

Rinse and repeat......

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Oh look, it's the grammar police. You lose on merits. So your recourse is this? lol

 

Face it dude. Your insults are as lame as your arguments. Maybe there are some 5th graders around you can practice on. Then come back and try again. It's okay, I'll wait.

It's just that you don't see to have a good grasp of the English language. You clearly misinterpreted my last post that was very easy to read. English is either a second language or... well, I hope English is a second language.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

That's what happens when you have Stockholders. Profits over glory.

Packers "stockholders" are that in name only...they do not, nor have they ever shared in any "profits".

In fact, the franchise operates under a not-for-profit corporate structure and is the only NFL for which annual financial statements/information is available to the general public...

...some starter reading here if you're interested: 

https://shareholder.broadridge.com/pdf/gbp/green-bay-packers-2020-annual-report.pdf

 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Even if the 5th being lost is guaranteed, that’s better value than we’ve gotten from a 5th round pick since 2012 with Josh Norman.
    • I'm not sure he's even worth signing to an extension at any point, even if he has a solid season. He turns 28 in a couple of weeks and has ONE 1,000 season in his career with better QB play than Bryce (and better coaching as well). He's a solid player, but fact remains that probably the best team at recognizing WR talent in the last 10-15 years, decided he wasn't someone they wanted to keep around.  I'd rather overpay for a better player in the offseason, and/or use our first rounder next year on a 21 year old WR with truly elite potential to pair with Legette. I like the trade to get us a solid WR option this year, but extending him now just makes absolutely no sense, it's the same problem we've had for the last decade, overpaying for average to slightly above average players. We aren't contenders this year and short of some absolute miracle happening, we won't be contenders for the following couple seasons either.  So why in the world does anyone think signing a 28 year old without a single elite season in his 5 year career is a smart move? We're not going to be contenders with a 30 or 31 year old Deontae Johnson making 25+ million a season, that's just asinine to think it's a smart move, even with a rising cap. I'd rather overpay a Aiyuk or Higgins by $7-10 million a season next offseason than pay Johnson a fair market contract.  Or try to trade for someone like DK Metcalf next offseason, who I don't think gets a new deal in Seattle, it's why they drafted JSN.
×
×
  • Create New...