Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers to retire?


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:
10 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

Aaron Rodgers, and Devante Adams say hi. Green Bays reputation has taken a big hit lately. They've had Rodger his whole career. And won 1 SB. I wouldn't say they were ever the gold standard.

That's what happens when you have Stockholders. Profits over glory.

Expand  

The Packers compete year in and year out. They have a total of four losing seasons since we entered the league. We have a total of seven winning seasons in that same timeframe. I wouldn't say they're the absolute gold standard either, but they're certainly one of the better ran teams in the league. 

Since 1995 (26 seasons):

Packers = 19 playoffs appearances, 38 playoff games, 21 playoff game wins, 2 Super Bowl titles.

Panthers = 8 playoff appearances, 17 playoff games, 9 playoff game wins, 0 Super Bowl titles.

  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Aaron Rodgers, and Devante Adams say hi. Green Bays reputation has taken a big hit lately. They've had Rodger his whole career. And won 1 SB. I wouldn't say they were ever the gold standard.

 

That's what happens when you have Stockholders. Profits over glory.

This has to be the dumbest Huddle post of 2021 to date. Congrats on that milestone.

Not that this clown ever showed much inclination towards knowing much about the NFL but....wow. Impressive.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:
25 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

How many teams have won 2 or more Super Bowls in last 30 years?

It's like 8-9 teams, right?

In the last 30 years only 3 teams have won more than 2 Super Bowls and they are:

Patriots (6), Cowboys (3), Broncos (3).

In that same time frame 5 other teams have won 2 Super Bowl titles and they are:

Packers (2), Steelers (2), Giants(2*), Buc's (2), Ravens (2).

The 30 games are rounded out with 8 teams who won a solo title and they are:

Eagles, Redskins, Seahawks, Rams, Saints, 49ers, Chiefs, Colts.

*Giants would have 3 if the time-frame were expanded to 31-years.

Two (2) seems like pretty goof company to me...

 

  • Beer 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Packers "stockholders" are that in name only...they do not, nor have they ever shared in any "profits".

In fact, the franchise operates under a not-for-profit corporate structure and is the only NFL for which annual financial statements/information is available to the general public...

...some starter reading here if you're interested: 

https://shareholder.broadridge.com/pdf/gbp/green-bay-packers-2020-annual-report.pdf

 

Good stuff. Funny how people rag on one of, if not the most loyal fan bases  in football.  Something Charlotte doesn’t have. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ickmule said:

Good stuff. Funny how people rag on one of, if not the most loyal fan bases  in football.  Something Charlotte doesn’t have. 

If you are trashing the history of the Packers or their success, and you AREN'T a division rival....you are just a plain dumbass. 

I would kill to have the current or historic success that Green Bay has had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

If only….

I wouldn't have wanted Harbaugh. He's far better suited to college coaching (though you wouldn't know it right now). 

Riddick? Is he really that good or is he another Jon Gruden like guy with a know it all image because he's got no accountability? I honestly don't know. 

And Fields? Well, we know where that stands. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't have wanted Harbaugh. He's far better suited to college coaching (though you wouldn't know it right now). 

Riddick? Is he really that good or is he another Jon Gruden like guy with a know it all image because he's got no accountability? I honestly don't know. 

And Fields? Well, we know where that stands. 

I think Harbaugh did better in the NFL personally. He took that Niners team on 3 great playoff runs and made their QBs look pretty great. He had an 8-8 record his last year, but it was known all year he was on his way out. Kind of hard to get players to buy in to a coach who is already on his way out. So he had his team in the NFC championship his first 3 years with a Super Bowl appearance in there and 500 his last year on his way out. I would love to see what he could do with a QB like Fields. Don’t get me wrong, I like Rhule/Fitts and think the team is trending in the right direction. Jim and Fields would have just been a dream scenario for me.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

If you are trashing the history of the Packers or their success, and you AREN'T a division rival....you are just a plain dumbass. 

I would kill to have the current or historic success that Green Bay has had. 

I agree.  I think it’s just people are envious of teams like that, they juat win year after year.   

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...