Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much preseason time should Darnold play?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

Gawd help us if  Grier is our number 2 ..   ( or Walker ) .   We have no number 2. 

I wish we had a washed up, aged , former starter,  like Derek Anderson was to Cam.  

 

Biggest problem I have with the Panthers offseason was not bringing in a second potential starting option. Whether it was drafting Fields or signing someone like Dalton, keeping Bridgewater or whoever. They needed another option. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Call Me James said:

The coaching staff and management believes they're good enough.

CmC said we have a complete offense. 

Seems fans want it both ways. 

I mean, those guys can't come out and say poo like, "Well, we've really miscalculated and we probably should have done more in the offseason" or "Yeah, I just don't trust these guys to block for me but I'm mostly used to that in my NFL career." 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2021 at 10:58 AM, OldhamA said:

The correct answer is as long as possible.

You're not evaluating Grier and Walker - you know exactly what they bring to the table.

Darnold and the #1s should be in as long as possible - that Oline needs extended snaps to gel.

 

Sam darnold is not some rookie. You know what you're getting with him as well. Not with grier or with walker, let the backups play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, am I wrong? I looked back over all his posts here and I didn't see anything positive other than Shough. Second, pretty sure if you had read the post I was responding to, you would have seen CRA made poo personal as well . You just choose to address me instead of him. Not sure why?????
    • I wanted XL but I felt he should have been a 2nd rounder but I understand the logic trading up just to get the option. A safety net for your gamble.    Certainly disappointed with his receivers development but i like his down field blocking and I imagine that's what's keeping him on the field. 
    • Pretty sure it is a given Young lacks typical QB size and strength and he is here simply because his other attributes more than make up for it. My point is not to indicate anyone "settled" for him but rather to remind people that there have been plenty of big, strong QB's that have not lived up to expectations. Jamis Winston, Anthony Richardson, Trey Lance, JaMarcus Russel are a few examples. They all have the physical attributes coveted by teams and yet none have had sustained success in the NFL. And yes, there are QBs that do have both but there aren't many and some of the ones still playing were failures with their early teams. Saying Young is a bust simply based upon his size (and I do think it is as simple as that for a few guys around here) is unfair to both him and the team.
×
×
  • Create New...