Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule after SECOND Joint Practice with the Colts


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

I agree %100. The negativity, and Worse Case Scenarios is really getting out of hand. 

 

It is permeating the whole board. It is extremely toxic around here right now.

 

Imagine what is going to happen the first bad pass Sam has? Or the first missed tackle? I really wish there was another board to visit. Something where Optimism is not treated like a mental disease.

Disagreement isn't toxic. Cordial conversations isn't toxic. Taking football disagreement personally and lashing out creates the toxic environment. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The reason(s) for those three losing seasons are no longer on the books though - surely that can't be held against Rhule and Fitterer?

 

Yes, yes it can.

 

8 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Rhule's decisions so far (coaching, FA's and drafting) have only increased my confidence in him. 

 

There are a bunch of us that agree with this statement.

 

8 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

As for those low-level OL FAs that we significantly overpaid for - we signed both on the FIRST day of FA. Our GM / HC clearly think that they're significant upgrades over what we had and fit the system we're trying to play. 

 

Sadly. There are a bunch of armchair GMs around here, that don't believe this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

I agree %100. The negativity, and Worse Case Scenarios is really getting out of hand. 

 

It is permeating the whole board. It is extremely toxic around here right now.

 

Imagine what is going to happen the first bad pass Sam has? Or the first missed tackle? I really wish there was another board to visit. Something where Optimism is not treated like a mental disease.

I wouldn't know.  I put like six people on ignore.  The only way I know what the bitch squad is saying is in other people's replies.

I am actually enjoying the board more now.

I'm looking forward to the "must win" preseason game tomorrow.  If we lose it, I'm thinking Tepper might fire Rhule.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

I wouldn't know.  I put like six people on ignore.  The only way I know what the bitch squad is saying is in other people's replies.

I am actually enjoying the board more now.

I'm looking forward to the "must win" preseason game tomorrow.  If we lose it, I'm thinking Tepper might fire Rhule.

This is the way to handle it. If you want to create a personal echo chamber, the ignore function allows you to pretty much do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

They're butthurt about not getting who they wanted in the preseason and have begun attacking the coach.  

Matt Rhule hasn't experienced even the tip of the iceberg of being attacked as the Panthers coach. I'm truly beginning to wonder if you were even around for the Rivera years. The man is still resoundingly despised by many. Rhule has a handful of detractors that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Disagreement isn't toxic. Cordial conversations isn't toxic. Taking football disagreement personally and lashing out creates the toxic environment. 

 

 

I  truly believe you don't see anything outside your tunnel vision. Cuz this place is Toxic. As much credit as you want to give me. I am not that influential.

 

It is the negativity, and worse case scenarios being floated around. It has brought the tember of the board down. 

 

Just look at the Wed camp thread. Then tell me it's all peaches and cream around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

Complaining about toxicity while personally contributing to it for hours on end 🙄 🤣

 

Oh no, I have been punked by frank. I will never be able to show my face again. Oh the Humanity. I will probably need counselling now. 

 

Edit to add. You know franky. Complaining about someone complaining, makes you a complainer. 

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preseason games are basically meaningless in terms of how starters are going to perform.  It wasn’t always that way, but it has been that way for along time now.  Almost every team approaches the preseason with one goal: to get their starters a little game time without getting them hurt.  The second half of that is not optional.  It is not about the starters.

Preseason has become an audition for the second-string backups who are not entrenched and those below them.  Nothing more.  That is why September games are almost painful to watch in terms of the quality of play on the field.  In the dark ages, preseason games were about gradually getting the starters ready, but the risk of that is getting them hurt in the process.  That’s just the way it is, and while I’d rather see a better product early, I understand it.

As for those complaining about Darnold and using this to bolster their belief he is trash, nobody cares.  We are going to know sometime in the 2021 season whether he is bad, decent, or good (I don’t expect great) based on actual results and trends that actually count.  I have no idea where he is going to fall on that spectrum, I hope for the best and hope I ultimately feel foolish for dismissing great.    

I share the concerns about the OL, largely because I have been conditioned to have those concerns based on most of the last decade.  I’d like to see some focus on that sometime in my lifetime.  But, I would have almost certainly picked Slater at 8 or tried to trade down a few notches to pick him and pocket something else of value, if that was possible.  That shows my bias toward that unit and its importance.  I’m still lamenting being one pick away from Sewell.

Darnold’s snap to release time last year was about a quarter of a second more than Teddy’s, so either that is going to have to change (and it might) or our OL is going to have to hold more of its own.

Still, it is year two of a near-complete overhaul.  If somehow this group is an incremental improvement over last year’s OL, that is progress.  But, I hold a grudge against he Lions for not picking the WR they needed at #7.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

I wouldn't know.  I put like six people on ignore.  The only way I know what the bitch squad is saying is in other people's replies.

I am actually enjoying the board more now.

I'm looking forward to the "must win" preseason game tomorrow.  If we lose it, I'm thinking Tepper might fire Rhule.

Respect this approach but I personally love the sky is falling, arm chair GM, bitch squad.  Sure the intelligent discussion is great, but the entertainment from that group makes me chuckle.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would hope as a pro HC , a pro OL coach and a pro GM, that collective group, already know their OL rotation.  If they don’t, they shouldn’t be here. 

what they also know is several of those players, that they bought low as Kmart blue light specials,  have injury histories and that is also why they are not playing 1st string tomorrow   They have to last thru 17 games 

I suspect the ones will play 1st quarter of  preseason game 3 at home and that’s it 

Might as well cool jets,  as that is how Rhule is most likely going to do business 

Reminder, they performed collectively pretty well last year without any preseason and a new coaching staff and offense 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Preseason games are basically meaningless in terms of how starters are going to perform.  It wasn’t always that way, but it has been that way for along time now.  Almost every team approaches the preseason with one goal: to get their starters a little game time without getting them hurt.  The second half of that is not optional.  It is not about the starters.

 

Preseason has become an audition for the second-string backups who are not entrenched and those below them.  Nothing more.  That is why September games are almost painful to watch in terms of the quality of play on the field.  In the dark ages, preseason games were about gradually getting the starters ready, but the risk of that is getting them hurt in the process.  That’s just the way it is, and while I’d rather see a better product early, I understand it.

 

As for those complaining about Darnold and using this to bolster their belief he is trash, nobody cares.  We are going to know sometime in the 2021 season whether he is bad, decent, or good (I don’t expect great) based on actual results and trends that actually count.  I have no idea where he is going to fall on that spectrum, I hope for the best and hope I ultimately feel foolish for dismissing great.    

 

I share the concerns about the OL, largely because I have been conditioned to have those concerns based on most of the last decade.  I’d like to see some focus on that sometime in my lifetime.  But, I would have almost certainly picked Slater at 8 or tried to trade down a few notches to pick him and pocket something else of value, if that was possible.  That shows my bias toward that unit and its importance.  I’m still lamenting being one pick away from Sewell.

 

Darnold’s snap to release time last year was about a quarter of a second more than Teddy’s, so either that is going to have to change (and it might) or our OL is going to have to hold more of its own.

 

Still, it is year two of a near-complete overhaul.  If somehow this group is an incremental improvement over last year’s OL, that is progress.  But, I hold a grudge against he Lions for not picking the WR they needed at #7.

 

 

Back in the day. Football wasn't a full time job. Players had off season jobs. TC and Pre Season were for getting those guys into playing shape. Then move on to installation. Plus there were 2 a days.

 

Nowadays. Football is a full time job. TC and Pre Season is for evaluation, and installation. No 2 a days.

 

Of course there are other differences, but that is the gist.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...