Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fields! ………Lance! ……..Darnold?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, thefuzz said:

I hated the Teddy move much moreso than the Sam move.

We were pushing hard for Stafford and Watson, but weren't willing to give up the farm for one, and the other screwed himself too many times.

Sam cost us a 2nd (not downplaying a 2, just compared to two 1's for MS) and some cap which "should" jump with the new TV deals coming.

If we simply didn't think that Jones and Fields were better prospects than Sam, then I support the decision...and it seems that many talent evaluator talking heads did say that were they all tossed in the same draft class that Sam would rank out as the 3rd best.  Now I have no idea what that all means, and likely nothing, but if Rhule and Fitt thought the same way, I totally get it.

P.S. I still think that Russ and Rodgers are dancing around in their minds a bit.

P.S.S. We need to address the OL to give Sam the best chance to thrive.  We have to see what we have.

I agree with this.  It seems they really want a vet at the helm right now.  I'm still not sold they are all in on Darnold being the answer.  I think at minimum they view him as a bridge for a few years that can keep them above 0.500 until they get whatever qb they looking for.  If Darnold can be that then great.  But the backup position needs a lot of work.  

Or I could be speaking out my ass because I've misread the whole situation. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ace420 said:

Fields was able to run in a TD today, but his 4.4 speed really just means that he is a great athlete. 

I agree that from time to time being a great athlete is handy but pocket awareness and mobility in the pocket are the main things I care about.  Ever since Cam it seems a lot of people think you have to have a running qb to win when most QBs definitely arent what I would call a running qb.  I believe Mahomes' 40 yard time was 4.8 and Rodgers was over a 4.7.  Being able to feel and avoid pressure in the pocket and then continue to make reads and throw on the move is much more important than a QB being able to run, as far as I'm concerned.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

I feel like people put too much value on a qb running a 4.40

See Lamar, and Kyle, its not about 4.4, its the athletic ability that leads to extended plays behind a "meh" OL.

They took the "safe" approach but you can't hit a homerun if you don't swing the bat. We bunted at no. 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

See Lamar, and Kyle, its not about 4.4, its the athletic ability that leads to extended plays behind a "meh" OL.

They took the "safe" approach but you can't hit a homerun if you don't swing the bat. We bunted at no. 8.

You dont draft someone just because they play a position you may need.  The coaches and scouts have to be sold on them based on their film and workouts.  For whatever reason they obviously weren't.  None of the rest really matters.  Could they end up being wrong?   Sure, every team and their staff makes mistakes, but I dont think this was playing it safe.  Honestly drafting fields would have been the safest option for them I would say. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

You dont draft someone just because they play a position you may need.  The coaches and scouts have to be sold on them based on their film and workouts.  For whatever reason they obviously weren't.  None of the rest really matters.  Could they end up being wrong?   Sure, every team and their staff makes mistakes, but I dont think this was playing it safe.  Honestly drafting fields would have been the safest option for them I would say. 

To me I think Chris Simms got in some folks head around here...not going say who but he was down on Fields but at the same time high on Darnold,huh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

To me I think Chris Simms got in some folks head around here...not going say who but he was down on Fields but at the same time high on Darnold,huh

You mean the panthers scouts and coaching staff?  You think Chris Simms got in their heads?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

One series?

This is not a recipe for success...

Probably not but I'm not coaching the team.

I'm just going on how Rhule would do things.

 

Personally, I would have the entire First Team play the entire 1st Half.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2021 at 11:09 AM, Jon Snow said:

I agree with this.  It seems they really want a vet at the helm right now.  I'm still not sold they are all in on Darnold being the answer.  I think at minimum they view him as a bridge for a few years that can keep them above 0.500 until they get whatever qb they looking for.  If Darnold can be that then great.  But the backup position needs a lot of work.  

Or I could be speaking out my ass because I've misread the whole situation. 

I think that you are probably hitting on it.

Personally, I think that they know that Sam has the upside to be a legit guy, but also the ability to get them through a couple more years to get their guy.  Teddy simply didn't have the upside to continue to "hope" with him.

If Sam takes the next step, it speeds up the timetable, if he doesn't, guess they are hoping he can buy them a couple more years until they land their guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the exception of knowing our obvious needs and who we were talking to along the way, my question is this:  How did so many people start on this Jalon Walker frenzy?  I think this--everyone wants to have a voice, make a prediction.  Now with social media and 24 hour tv, networks, etc.  it is more like a middle school grapevine than it is a process where people actually dig for real evidence and reasons.  Speculative journalism is lazy, and since there are now 2,348.356 podcasters with basement studios blasting nonsense into our phones all day, I think they just cut and paste ideas.  Yes, coaches lie and mislead, but I don't think Morgan or Canales did.  You are only as reliable as your sources.  Was Morgan more deliberate this year?  I think he heard the gossip and decided to downplay WR.  He said, (paraphrasing) "We like our QB room.  We will probably add to it at some point."  Not a lie, but definitely downplaying things. I was convinced that we needed a blazer to keep safeties honest, but to be honest, I am not sure that we have the QB with the arm to keep safeties honest.  We have Coker who is 6'1", Theilen is 6'2", and Legette is 6'3" and now TMac is 6'4"+.  It seems size has more value than blazing deep speed.  If I had known they thought that, I might have gone with TMac all along--I thought he was not a good fit.  And if you look at the Panther guide and consider the talent they met with in the first round, there was only one offensive player--TMac. There was another quote that Morgan made that might have been a bit revealing or at least directive. (Paraphrasing) "We want players that were productive in college."  Well, TMac was very productive. In 2023 and in 2024, he averaged 108.8 yards per game.   He is also a great artist.  Drew this portrait of Bryce Young from memory: Many people spent 3 months absolutely confident that Jalon Walker would play edge here. We had a need at edge, but with Clowney, Wonnum, and Jones, were we OK if we drafted a second round Edge? Was Walker the answer?  Unlike Hunter, he is a versatile player who could be awesome in the right system, but if used as a pure edge, he is not a top 10 player.  I was convinced that we would sign Jalon and as much as I like the kid, I could not feel good about the pick.  Mykel Williams scared me.  Both might be great players, but I could not see it.  So was Scourton productive? He was as a Jr when he was standing.  When asked to be other things, he lost his edge (pun intended). In essence, I think we got the best pure edge when you take away the other things he was supposed to do.  Walker's productivity was based on his versatility--something he would lose as a pure edge--so we would not really be meeting needs at edge.  Scourton, on the other hand, is better when not asked to be versatile.  Princely had 10.5 sacks in the SEC.  It simply makes sense.
    • I think they will too. Renfrow will use this opportunity to get in shape and get paid for it. After he's cut he will probably get picked up by someone after preseason.
×
×
  • Create New...