Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question...what if P.J is better then S D?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, 1usctrojan said:

No, not at all…,simply presenting another scenario.  I believe in him, doesn’t matter to me where, as long as he’s happy.  
 

Everyone wins if he succeeds in Carolina.  

But here's the issue.

You trade him anywhere else again, he's done as an NFL Starter.

This is IT.

If he can't succeed here as a long-term NFL QB Starter, he can't succeed anywhere.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 1usctrojan said:

Well, Sam loves Charlotte….give him a chance to be good enough.  If he improves, trade him next year, at least you’re not exposing a rookie to an oline that is a work in progress.  Won’t be long till you find out what you have.  

 

Great post.  Hope this works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Peon Awesome said:

If PJ is better than Darnold, that's not only a terrible sign for this season and the immediate outlook of this franchise but would make the Darnold trade one of the worst decisions in franchise history.

Having said that, PJ is still a reasonable backup. If Darnold gets hurt and we're not looking competitive, we can trot him out, make our games semi-interesting even if largely uncompetitive, and angle for a top draft pick. If Darnold keeps us afloat for a playoff spot leading up to his injury, we can scour the league and buy low on a semi-decent fill in (e.g. Minshew or Foles) and leave PJ as the backup.

 

its almost like yall don't listen to what people are saying. semi interesting? thats like the polar oppsoite of what people have said about his game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tinamedina said:

Now he has the talent. But just 5 months ago when he was still on the JETs thats not how most of you felt. I just think this sudden switch up is weird.

I can see where it can seem weird.  I honestly wouldn't have given Darnold another look had we not traded for him.  I thought wtf are they doing?  When we had Darnold, and Fields was there at 8 I thought for sure we'd take Fields.  Darnold was insurance in case no good QB's fell.  Nope, they rode with Darnold.  So then after it was official we're rolling this guy, I thought I'd dig into it a little bit.  I started with highlights, but then watched some games.  The guy has talent, and most people agree on that.  There were flashes in most games.

So I figured I'd do a look into just how bad the jets were, outside the QB.  That's when I realized that Fit and Rhule were on to something.  When you have one of the worst o-lines in the league, with one of the highest pressure %, shortest unpressured pocket time, receivers with the dropsies who can't get separation, franchise-record-low run game, no QB coach, and literally have trouble snapping the ball, it became apparent that Darnold was carrying too much with that team.  In three years he missed several games for injury and illness.  They didn't win ONE game he missed.  Not one.  That's when I joined the "give Darnold a chance" club.

Some people aren't going to switch until we're winning.  That's fine.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

I can see where it can seem weird.  I honestly wouldn't have given Darnold another look had we not traded for him.  I thought wtf are they doing?  When we had Darnold, and Fields was there at 8 I thought for sure we'd take Fields.  Darnold was insurance in case no good QB's fell.  Nope, they rode with Darnold.  So then after it was official we're rolling this guy, I thought I'd dig into it a little bit.  I started with highlights, but then watched some games.  The guy has talent, and most people agree on that.  There were flashes in most games.

So I figured I'd do a look into just how bad the jets were, outside the QB.  That's when I realized that Fit and Rhule were on to something.  When you have one of the worst o-lines in the league, with one of the highest pressure %, shortest unpressured pocket time, receivers with the dropsies who can't get separation, franchise-record-low run game, no QB coach, and literally have trouble snapping the ball, it became apparent that Darnold was carrying too much with that team.  In three years he missed several games for injury and illness.  They didn't win ONE game he missed.  Not one.  That's when I joined the "give Darnold a chance" club.

Some people aren't going to switch until we're winning.  That's fine.  

Yeah but PJ would have blocked for himself and threw it to himself on a playbook he wrote the night before so we better start him, especially after the MVP like performance Sunday. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Yeah but PJ would have blocked for himself and threw it to himself on a playbook he wrote the night before so we better start him, especially after the MVP like performance Sunday. 

Ok?  Apparently someone's mad at PJ.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SBBlue said:

I can see where it can seem weird.  I honestly wouldn't have given Darnold another look had we not traded for him.  I thought wtf are they doing?  When we had Darnold, and Fields was there at 8 I thought for sure we'd take Fields.  Darnold was insurance in case no good QB's fell.  Nope, they rode with Darnold.  So then after it was official we're rolling this guy, I thought I'd dig into it a little bit.  I started with highlights, but then watched some games.  The guy has talent, and most people agree on that.  There were flashes in most games.

So I figured I'd do a look into just how bad the jets were, outside the QB.  That's when I realized that Fit and Rhule were on to something.  When you have one of the worst o-lines in the league, with one of the highest pressure %, shortest unpressured pocket time, receivers with the dropsies who can't get separation, franchise-record-low run game, no QB coach, and literally have trouble snapping the ball, it became apparent that Darnold was carrying too much with that team.  In three years he missed several games for injury and illness.  They didn't win ONE game he missed.  Not one.  That's when I joined the "give Darnold a chance" club.

Some people aren't going to switch until we're winning.  That's fine.  

The skepticism by some is a bit annoying (especially when some are just proclaiming him to be the worst QB in the history of the NFL and continue to whine about Fields or want PJ to start[that's CP, though] ) but I guess it's a What-Have-You-Done-For-Me-Lately league so I'm sure if(or rather...WHEN) Sam plays well and helps the Panthers win NFL games, that attitude will start trending toward a more Positive outlook.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He has a good arm. He has plus athleticism. He's not Mahomes or Rodgers but he has the talent to be a legit NFL QB. Do I think it's going to happen? Honestly, no I don't. But the possibility does exist. The odds were 0.00% with Teddy.

 

The odds are high that Lawrence, Wilson, Fields and Jones bust too.

You have to bring more than odds to the table in a discussion about QBs. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The odds are high that Lawrence, Wilson, Fields and Jones bust too.

You have to bring more than odds to the table in a discussion about QBs. 

Odds aren't high the entire class busts.  

Especially Trevor and Fields both busting IMO.  I think it is a safe bet at least one of them becomes a legit franchise QB.   There college resumes answered a lot more questions IMO than your standard top tier prospect. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The odds are high that Lawrence, Wilson, Fields and Jones bust too.

You have to bring more than odds to the table in a discussion about QBs. 


OK. 22 QBs chosen in the top half of the first round from 2011-19. First year of rookie deals that changed everything. 
 

  7 are(were) worthy of that status. Cam, Luck, Watson, Mahomes, Allen, Mayfield, Murray. Tannehill and Goff could go either way. 

13 were busts. Locker, Gabbert, Ponder, Manuel, RG111, Bortles, Winston, Mariota, Darnold, Haskins, Rosen, Trubisky, Jones. 
 

  So of 20, there is a 35% a team gets a franchise QB. Of all those busts, who “turned” it around? Tannehill was on his 2nd contract, with a major injury, on the team that drafted him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 


OK. 22 QBs chosen in the top half of the first round from 2011-19. First year of rookie deals that changed everything. 
 

  7 are(were) worthy of that status. Cam, Luck, Watson, Mahomes, Allen, Mayfield, Murray. Tannehill and Goff could go either way. 

13 were busts. Locker, Gabbert, Ponder, Manuel, RG111, Bortles, Winston, Mariota, Darnold, Haskins, Rosen, Trubisky, Jones. 
 

  So of 20, there is a 35% a team gets a franchise QB. Of all those busts, who “turned” it around? Tannehill was on his 2nd contract, with a major injury, on the team that drafted him.

also, the busts get weird.  I mean, Mariota vs Manuel for example.   Serviceable player vs doesn't belong in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

also, the busts get weird.  I mean, Mariota vs Manuel for example.   Serviceable player vs doesn't belong in the league. 

You get taken that high and don’t get a 2nd contract with that team, that’s a bust. And Mariota cost much more in draft capital. 
 

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Since its release in the early 1990s, QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 has grown to become the highest rated and most popular accounting software solution for small businesses. QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 helps businesses effectively manage their inventory, sales and payroll and offers a host of other important items for smaller businesses when it comes to their financial records. However, like any software program, there is always room for user error and there are some common errors that every QuickBooks user should be aware of. This article explores 10 of the most common errors that QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 users make. The list includes setup errors (e.g. using too many accounts and sub-accounts), procedural errors (e.g. using the Write Checks window to pay payroll taxes) and other errors such as not regularly checking the balance sheet statement and not exploring third party options that expand the capabilities of QuickBooks. Here is a list of the 10 most common QuickBooks reporting errors and how to avoid them: 1. Not Setting Sales Tax Preferences If sales tax is owed on items that a business sells, the sales tax preferences must be set up in QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 to keep the records accurate. To set sales tax preferences, go to Edit—Preferences—Sales Tax icon—Company Preferences—Owe Sales Tax and then choose either As of Invoice Date or Upon Receipt of payment. 2. Not Reconciling Accounts To ensure the business account register is correct, accounts must be regularly reconciled. This includes checking and savings accounts, loans, taxes and more. To reconcile an account, open the Banking section, click on Reconcile, then enter statement dates and end balances. After each item in the Checks and Payments column is checked off, the bottom right corner should read zero.  3. Writing a Check Without Entering a Bill When a bill arrives, some business owners imply use the Write Check feature to pay the bill. The first step when a new bill arrives should be to enter the bill in the Enter Bills window. This creates an accounts payable. Then, go to Pay Bills and indicate the bill you want to pay. This takes care of the accounts payable for that vendor and allows you to use QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 to properly manage your cash flow and plan for future expenses. 4. Using the Write Checks Window to Pay Payroll Taxes As payroll is processed, QuickBooks reporting software keeps track of how much payroll tax the business owes and records that amount in the Payroll Liabilities window. However, if payrolls taxes are paid in the Write Checks window, the amount paid will not be properly deducted from the Payroll Liabilities window. Paying these payroll taxes directly in the Pay Liability window will make the proper deductions and keep the books straight. 5. Not Reviewing P&L and Balance Sheet Statements These statements give valuable information about the health of the business and can help catch errors before they become costly mistakes. These valuable statements should be reviewed regularly. 6. Too Many Accounts and Sub-Accounts One benefit of QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 financial reporting software is the ability to create accounts and further organize them into sub-accounts. Think carefully about the logical ordering of account information but try to group things into as few categories as possible to avoid complicating the system. 7. Entering a Bill or Writing a Check for Loan Payments Many business owners use the Enter a Bill or the Write a Check windows to make loan payments each month. A better strategy is to go to Banking—Loan Manager—Set Up a New Loan. After following the directions to set up the loan, the next step is to click the Set Up Payment option. Once this is in place, QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 reporting will automatically enter the payment each month and also keep track of the principle and interest. 8. Skipping the Receive Payments Step When money comes in, many QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 users go right to the Make Deposits screen. However, it should first be recorded in the Receive Payments window so the invoice will be shown as paid. 9. Not Backing Up the Data It’s best to plan for the unexpected. In this case, that would be a computer crash that wipes out the QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438 reporting files. Business QuickBooks files should be backed up at the end of each day they are used. 10. Not Expanding QuickBooks’s Capabilities There are many apps, add-ons and consolidation software that work to expand the capabilities of QuickBooks reporting. These can help with more complex needs such as preparing consolidated financial reports. For businesses with extra needs, it is wise to look into other software that will help you get the most out of QuickBooks +1-844-476-5438.
    • Or he had to take it extra easy this offseason after carrying his WR room to a championship last year
    • How in the fug is Thomas still on the team? That guy is a litmus test for if the current staff will fail. Did they keep Thomas? Ohh well maybe next year...
×
×
  • Create New...