Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Controversy


CPsinceDay1
 Share

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You know, it amazes me that people come into a clearly titled thread to complain about the topic instead of simply not clicking. Actually, it doesn't amaze me. It's par for the course. I just don't understand what drives people to do it 🤔

 

 

Seriously though, you're right 😃

Well to be fair, if you look at the title, it's not very descriptive.

All it said is "QB Controversy" which is enticing to click to find out what this is all about.

So you can understand the annoyance by some when it's ONCE AGAIN more PJ Walker talk by the resident PJ Walker fan.   *shrugs*

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

If Darnold sucks ass and then PJ Walker comes in and wrecks poo I would love that.  We should change the name of this site to CPSinceDay1 Huddle if that happens.

If that happens, I'm going to play the Powerball and MegaMillions lottery 'cause pigs would be flying outside.  😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mc52beast said:

Not wasting my time clicking on that crap. There is no controversy, Sam is our starter. They didn’t pick up his option so that PJ could take the job.

So if PJ clearly performing better in practice, in game's, you really think they continue to stick with Darnold if he's not showing any improvement. Maybe Darnold hasn't really picked up the playbook, Cam was limited in NE because of the new playbook terminology. Is Darnold having a hard time adjusting??? 

You pick up the 5th option, as many have said the deadline was around the corner...but you can fool some people some of the time, but not all the people all the time...that locker room is watching 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

So if PJ clearly performing better in practice, in game's, you really think they continue to stick with Darnold if he's not showing any improvement. Maybe Darnold hasn't really picked up the playbook, Cam was limited in NE because of the new playbook terminology. Is Darnold having a hard time adjusting??? 

You pick up the 5th option, as many have said the deadline was around the corner...but you can fool some people some of the time, but not all the people all the time...that locker room is watching 

PJ, please just show us on Saturday and stop posting in The Huddle!

Iron Man Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

So if PJ clearly performing better in practice, in game's, you really think they continue to stick with Darnold if he's not showing any improvement. Maybe Darnold hasn't really picked up the playbook, Cam was limited in NE because of the new playbook terminology. Is Darnold having a hard time adjusting??? 

You pick up the 5th option, as many have said the deadline was around the corner...but you can fool some people some of the time, but not all the people all the time...that locker room is watching 

I'd rather have Minshew backing up Sam than PJ but that's just me. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

So if PJ clearly performing better in practice, in game's, you really think they continue to stick with Darnold if he's not showing any improvement. Maybe Darnold hasn't really picked up the playbook, Cam was limited in NE because of the new playbook terminology. Is Darnold having a hard time adjusting??? 

You pick up the 5th option, as many have said the deadline was around the corner...but you can fool some people some of the time, but not all the people all the time...that locker room is watching 

PJ, just work hard to keep your back up spot because if they bring in a competent back up QB you would be toast. Your college Pal is the only reason you are in the league.... be thankful for that. Id rather keep you as a back up though because you are cheap and if Sam goes down we can get the first pick.

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think the big controversy is that Tepper and Richardson both spent wads of money on GMs, coaches and staff that work year round all the while we have a board full of geniuses that are capable of doing it for free simply by watching YouTube and a couple games.

 

Friends Lol GIF by HBO Max

 

download (4).jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree it is more about the OL. If you happen to have a world beater with a great OL then that’s better obviously but you don’t need to have that.  Capable and durable guys that can get to the second level with good blocking can be plenty.  
    • I think Gibbs is special, but you’re right, some of the top investments have proven to not be much different than some 2nds and 3rds. Taylor for example is on an MVP level season. James Cook is doing better than Breece Hall for example. Raiders weren’t in a good spot to draft Jeanty. Same with the Falcons/Bijan.  You gotta swing at the right time — the investment shouldn’t come too early. You almost have to stumble into a guy mid to late rounds while building or find that guy to put you over the top when the team is finally well rounded.
    • Like I said in another post yesterday, the handling of the offensive line by Fitterer and mostly Morgan has been crazy. We've spent way too much money(Lewis and Hunt) to keep Bryce upright instead of using our picks in the 2nd round on JPJ and Frazier. Could have kept an injured Corbett at guard, Brady at swing, and still taken Maye as a backup, sorry Zavala. We wouldn't have taken XL, but XL hasn't been as advertised anyway, and Brooks hasn't contributed anything. Moton's extension with it's signing bonus made him uncutable. Icky's contract was due at the same time Bryce's 3rd year ended, and we all know it's extension or 5th year, and if we're going to do a 5th year, he's going to want the extension.  To me the whole thing is just ridiculous. Right now, depending on if Tepper decides to keep Bryce, it feels like we're going to have to choose between Icky and a Bryce extension. Maybe he plays on the 5th year, but I think he'll want the big money guarantee.  JMO, but if you took a look at how the contracts could potentially fall, the writing was on the wall that this could be a cash flow nightmare. Too many contract guarantees, not enough rookie contracts to offset the upcoming paydays. 
×
×
  • Create New...