Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Postgame thoughts. Preseason game 2


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

- It was a disappointing performance we were unable to build off of the positive play vs the Colts last week

- In reality our 1st quarter was quite good when our #1's were out there we looked solid

- 2nd half offense was unwatchable - most of these players (Ivey, Hogan, Monteiro) are 3rd string and will be cut in a week

- We need a FB 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Everyone that has seen him in practice

The practices you called controlled drills, which are a joke?

So suddenly its ok to evaluate a player from the practices. As long as its not Darnold.
 

6 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

And I dont feel like multi-quoting, but that statement about them not trusting him wasn't difficult to understand...

Mostly because it makes no sense at all.  Darnold not playing more is not a sign of not trusting him.  Darnold playing more is not a sign of trusting him.
 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, NiceDreams said:

Take this for what it's worth, coming from a Jets fan who watched Sam for the past 3 years. He 100% stared down his first read and waited until Robby got open. A big part of playing QB is between the ears and Sam just doesn't process information quickly enough to be a quality first string NFL QB. If there is one thing that became obvious to our entire fanbase after watching him over the past 3 years it's this.....If Sam's first read is not open, bad things tend to happen more often than not. Best of luck to you guys this year and hopefully Ruhle can squeeze some lemonade out of lemons from the QB position.

And take this from a Former Jets fan :

The Jets will ruin Zach Wilson.  ENJOY.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NiceDreams said:

Players either have it or they don't. The whole "insert franchise" ruined "insert player" is a fallacy, IMO.

surrrre.     Let's go with that, buddy.  😏

 

Zach could end up being yet another Mark Sanchez (but without the weapons to help him succeed his first two seasons).    Good Luck...pffft!

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

The practices you called controlled drills, which are a joke?

So suddenly its ok to evaluate a player from the practices. As long as its not Darnold.
 

Mostly because it makes no sense at all.  Darnold not playing more is not a sign of not trusting him.  Darnold playing more is not a sign of trusting him.
 

I'm not entertaining nonsense.

You know the difference between CMC and Darnold.  One is proven in this league and is with the same team he was drafted by, in his second year in this offense.  One has been a bust, in a new offense, with a new team.  One has nothing to prove, unless you're trying to create something for the sake of arguing.  The other has everything to prove.  I think its pretty clear what you've done in that regard here.

I never used a triple negative in a sentence or statement nor was I unclear about the point I was making, so it's clear you're just being purposely obtuse, especially after I clarified it a second time.

The end.  Have fun with your strawman.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I'm not entertaining nonsense.

You know the difference between CMC and Darnold.  One is proven in this league and is with the same team he was drafted by, in his second year in this offense.  One has been a bust, in a new offense, with a new team.  One has nothing to prove, unless you're trying to create something for the sake of arguing.  The other has everything to prove.  I think its pretty clear what you've done in that regard here.

I never used a triple negative in a sentence or statement nor was I unclear about the point I was making, so it's clear you're just being purposely obtuse, especially after I clarified it a second time.

The end.  Have fun with your strawman.

 

Maybe you should move on if you can't tell I am not actually advocating that CMC should be playing.

I just think you don't understand how little value preseason games hold in todays NFL after the advent of joint practices.

Your point just seems mostly.  Stupid.  It basically boils down to "Darnold should be playing because I want to personally see him play".  It doesn't actually add anything.

Chemistry?  Chemistry with who?  2nd and 3rd stringers?  The 1st stringers aren't playing as a unit, so he would not be getting chemistry with people that matter.  Like he does in the join practices.

New offense with a new team?  They aren't running the actual Panther playbook.  Its always a scaled back version of what they would run in a regular season.  So needing to "get used to the new playbook" or offense is irrelevant, because he wouldnt be getting used to it even if he did play.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panthers8969 said:

Why is he held out of the preseason games if they are the same thing as joint practices? Spoiler: it’s bc the games aren’t the same as joint practices 

Wut?

You’re saying because he hasn’t played in the games it’s somehow hypocritical to participate in joint practices. 

And

You incorrectly assert that “games and practices are equal” was ever stated by anyone but you.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:


I just think you don't understand how little value preseason games hold in todays NFL after the advent of joint practices.
 

I don’t think Bill Belichick understands football as well as you then…

He had joint practices this week. 

and then he played his starters for multiple series.  Because his team is no longer proven on O at the QB spot going into this season. Reps are needed. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

Maybe you should move on if you can't tell I am not actually advocating that CMC should be playing.

I just think you don't understand how little value preseason games hold in todays NFL after the advent of joint practices.

Your point just seems mostly.  Stupid.  It basically boils down to "Darnold should be playing because I want to personally see him play".  It doesn't actually add anything.

Chemistry?  Chemistry with who?  2nd and 3rd stringers?  The 1st stringers aren't playing as a unit, so he would not be getting chemistry with people that matter.  Like he does in the join practices.

New offense with a new team?  They aren't running the actual Panther playbook.  Its always a scaled back version of what they would run in a regular season.  So needing to "get used to the new playbook" or offense is irrelevant, because he wouldnt be getting used to it even if he did play.

Thank you for your valuable contribution.

Even in that post, you conflated the points I was making so you could serve up some more heaping helpings of "gotcha!" rebuttals to poo I wasn't even saying or debating.😂

I said nothing of chemistry.  You brought that up yourself.

I never said whether you did or didn't want CMC to play.  But now that you have said that you did, then why are you haggling me so much over me wanting to see Darnold play?  Yes, I want to see him play myself with a new team and in this offense.  And I already acknowledged they're running dumbed down, vanilla versions of plays and schemes in preseason before you typed that up in your most recent reply.  But, even with those generic versions of playcalling, you still gain experience and a feel for everything with new teammates.  And if I'm not mistaken, many of the ones stayed out there for the next series after Darnold sat.  Would you now like to argue that there's no point in the joint practices bc they don't want to show them their "real" playbook then either?  😂  Seems like you have the time on your hands and could get some mileage out of it.

So again, what are you arguing?  You're not...  You're just simply arguing for the sake of arguing.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Wut?

You’re saying because he hasn’t played in the games it’s somehow hypocritical to participate in joint practices. 

And

You incorrectly assert that “games and practices are equal” was ever stated by anyone but you.

 

 

It’s not hypocritical, it’s simply a break in logic. My whole point was that Sam needs preseason game reps and someone (not sure if that was you or not, don’t track usernames) said that he’s not playing Bc he doesn’t have his starting 5 OL healthy. Someone also said that he doesn’t need game reps bc they have joint practices… where he also doesn’t have his starting 5 OL. So which is it? Are joint practices the same as preseason games and it’s bs Sam can practice there but not games or are games different then the practices and it’s stupid to not give Sam those reps? They can’t be different and the same based on whichever argument youre in at the time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn the Tankers are already out here talking bout tanking?  
    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
×
×
  • Create New...