Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 4 Man Rush presents a Front Four Film Review on....... Pat Elflein vs. Pittsburgh Steelers


trueblade
 Share

Recommended Posts

Whew... yeah... ummm...

At a certain point you have to wonder if perhaps we can't choose a decent O-line coach and that our scouts just can't judge offensive linemen. We've got Meyer and Sparano working on it this season, but could we not, even by accident, develop more than one starting quality offensive lineman? We have Moton and... a bunch of guys who'd struggle to start on any other team in the league.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Whew... yeah... ummm...

At a certain point you have to wonder if perhaps we can't choose a decent O-line coach and that our scouts just can't judge offensive linemen. We've got Meyer and Sparano working on it this season, but could we not, even by accident, develop more than one starting quality offensive lineman? We have Moton and... a bunch of guys who'd struggle to start on any other team in the league.

 


OL has become the hardest position to find quality guys.

That body type and athleticism is become more rare.

All teams struggle with this position. I think finding good players outside of the draft is like finding a good QB outside the draft. Pretty much impossible in normal circumstances.

Our problem has been drafting bad OL the past few years.

Thank Hurney.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tbe said:


OL has become the hardest position to find quality guys.

That body type and athleticism is become more rare.

All teams struggle with this position. I think finding good players outside of the draft is like finding a good QB outside the draft. Pretty much impossible in normal circumstances.

Our problem has been drafting bad OL the past few years.

Thank Hurney.

One thing people need to realize is that we had to hit the reset button on the line this year simply because Marty left the cupboard bear across the line. We are starting with Moton and Paradis (who we only have for one year and leaves a lot to be desired) so we had to find plug and play guys to step in on year one under Fitt while the guys we draft get up to speed. 

We took two guys in Christiansen and Brown who look like they might contribute, hopefully soon. If that's the case then two more spots along the line have been plugged, with Moton under contract, so we can focus on acquiring a Center and a G/T in the draft or FA next offseason when we have buttloads of cash. 

Things aren't as dire as they seem. The cake is still baking, it's just not read yet.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of this was said about the OL last year, and they were still middle of the pack. Having CMC, and the ability to run should alleviate some of the pressure on the offensive line. 

I know people are frustrated but we are not the only team dealing with starting OL issues. KC was able to turn it around 1) due to trading a 1st, and 2) they are a SB ring waiting to happen so they will get the top FA's that are available if they are able to pay them. 

Almost all of the best OL's are full of older guys -- DAL / PHI -- last year PIT. TB hit on Whirfs, so in our case and many other teams would you rather reach at OL, or take a talent like TMJ at the bottom of Rd2. 

We added two young promising OL in Christensen / Brown, let them continue to develop, I have little doubt our OL will look much different by the mid way point. Whether it's on field play or guys missing time inevitably. 

At the very least we seem to have a direction that we're going in. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Whew... yeah... ummm...

At a certain point you have to wonder if perhaps we can't choose a decent O-line coach and that our scouts just can't judge offensive linemen. We've got Meyer and Sparano working on it this season, but could we not, even by accident, develop more than one starting quality offensive lineman? We have Moton and... a bunch of guys who'd struggle to start on any other team in the league.

 

Well, hard to mold a sculpture out of a wet poo. I tend to believe the problem isn't coaching but talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

One thing people need to realize is that we had to hit the reset button on the line this year simply because Marty left the cupboard bear across the line. We are starting with Moton and Paradis (who we only have for one year and leaves a lot to be desired) so we had to find plug and play guys to step in on year one under Fitt while the guys we draft get up to speed. 

We took two guys in Christiansen and Brown who look like they might contribute, hopefully soon. If that's the case then two more spots along the line have been plugged, with Moton under contract, so we can focus on acquiring a Center and a G/T in the draft or FA next offseason when we have buttloads of cash. 

Things aren't as dire as they seem. The cake is still baking, it's just not read yet.


Right, we got what was available to us in FA.

The word during the draft was there were a number of upset coaches because we kept trading down and passing a OL prospects.

What I took from that is Fitts has a multi year plan. We had a ton of needs and knew we couldn’t address every position, so we stocked up on picks and took BPA at the picks we got. OL happened to fall the way it did.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

A lot of this was said about the OL last year, and they were still middle of the pack. Having CMC, and the ability to run should alleviate some of the pressure on the offensive line. 

I know people are frustrated but we are not the only team dealing with starting OL issues. KC was able to turn it around 1) due to trading a 1st, and 2) they are a SB ring waiting to happen so they will get the top FA's that are available if they are able to pay them. 

Almost all of the best OL's are full of older guys -- DAL / PHI -- last year PIT. TB hit on Whirfs, so in our case and many other teams would you rather reach at OL, or take a talent like TMJ at the bottom of Rd2. 

We added two young promising OL in Christensen / Brown, let them continue to develop, I have little doubt our OL will look much different by the mid way point. Whether it's on field play or guys missing time inevitably. 

At the very least we seem to have a direction that we're going in. 

The issue with this is that we seem to think scheme and offensive talent can make up for OL deficiencies. That's typically untrue. Teddy and the scheme masked a lot of issues with OL last season.

We will see how it works out this season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if you can justify hinging the season on signings like Erving and Elflein bc they were all that was supposedly available the more egregious error was thinking we were good with our starting center which is just as important as left tackle. Paradis is the same he has always been. I got grief from ppl for mentioning this a few months ago but here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tbe said:


OL has become the hardest position to find quality guys.

That body type and athleticism is become more rare.

All teams struggle with this position. I think finding good players outside of the draft is like finding a good QB outside the draft. Pretty much impossible in normal circumstances.

Our problem has been drafting bad OL the past few years.

Thank Hurney.

Well, you're partly right on the drafting, except we draft linemen nearly as often as you'd think. We picked up two in the most recent draft, who may or may not pan out. None in 2020, Little and Daley (bust and backup-ish) in 2019, none in 2018, Moton in 2017, none in 2016, Williams in 2015, Turner in 2014 and Kugbila (washout) in 2013. 

Nine guys in nine drafts. Moton and Little were both taken in the second rounds. Moton has become a stalwart here and Little, well if he hadn't had the concussions he might have been decent. Since we never really got to see Little perform (getting injured way early in his rookie season) we'll just have to count him as bust based on performance. But those are our two highest draft picks spent on the line. That's it. 

Even with all of the worry and difficulties we saw last year because of bad line play, and picking early in the draft, we still didn't even make an effort until the third round. We took Christensen, a well-regarded LT, and then pretty much were told he wasn't expected to play LT or even be a starter this year. We took another guy in the sixth, G Deonte Brown from the stout Alabama championship team O-line, and  even after a decent preseason stuck him in the second string. 

At a certain point, you have to wonder do we even know what we're doing? Or are we specifically just stashing players for Rhule's third season? And trying to get another high draft pick by sacrificing Sam Darnold? (Let's face it, if bad line play kills Darnold's season, the blame will fall more on the side of Darnold just couldn't cut it and he was what we thought he was.)

I know it sounds crazy, but it's just as crazy to think that in nine drafts and the off seasons accompanying them, we could only draft, attract or develop Taylor Moton and produce umpteen meh linemen? Random chance probably would have served us better than this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Texas listed him as playing at 207. https://texassports.com/sports/football/roster/jonathon-brooks/12405 216 may have been a combine weight, and those are of course always reflective of real-world     
    • 1855-INTUIT-TFN QuickBooks Payroll Support (𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓)-𝟔𝟎𝟒-𝟖𝟓𝟓𝟔 would be a valuable resource for users navigating the intricacies of payroll management within the QuickBooks ecosystem. Here’s a breakdown of how such an article might be structured: Introduction to QuickBooks Payroll Support: This section would offer an overview of QuickBooks Payroll Support (𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓)-𝟔𝟎𝟒-𝟖𝟓𝟓𝟔, highlighting its significance for businesses managing payroll processes. It would stress the importance of accurate payroll management and the role QuickBooks Payroll Support plays in ensuring smooth operations. Common Issues Addressed: The FAQ section would outline common problems or queries users might encounter with QuickBooks Payroll (𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓)-𝟔𝟎𝟒-𝟖𝟓𝟓𝟔. This could include issues related to setting up payroll, processing payroll runs, handling payroll taxes, generating reports, and resolving errors or discrepancies. How to Contact QuickBooks Payroll Support: Clear instructions would be provided on how users can reach QuickBooks Payroll Support. This might include phone numbers, email addresses, live chat options, or links to online support portals dedicated specifically to payroll-related inquiries. Availability and Hours of Operation: Users would be informed about the availability of QuickBooks Payroll Support, including standard business hours, weekend availability, and any variations based on geographical regions or holidays. Response Times: Information on average response times for different types of inquiries would be helpful for users managing their expectations. This section might also cover factors that could affect response times and offer tips on how users can expedite the resolution of their issues. Tips for Efficient Support: Users would be provided with practical tips on how to prepare for contacting support, such as gathering necessary information beforehand (e.g., employee details, payroll history, error messages) to streamline the troubleshooting process. Alternative Support Resources: In addition to direct support channels, users might be directed to alternative support resources such as online help articles, video tutorials, or community forums where they can find answers to common questions or seek assistance from other users. Feedback and Satisfaction: Encouraging users to provide feedback on their support experience would be important for improving service quality. This section could outline how users can share their feedback and suggestions for enhancing QuickBooks Payroll Support. Security and Privacy: Reassuring users about the security and privacy measures in place when contacting QuickBooks Payroll Support would help build trust. This might include information on data encryption, secure communication channels, and compliance with relevant privacy regulations. In essence, an article with an FAQ section about QuickBooks Payroll Support would aim to provide users with comprehensive guidance on how to address payroll-related issues and effectively engage with QuickBooks’ support team for assistance.
    • Call Us Global 1855-SAGE-TFN-𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓*𝟔𝟎𝟒-𝟖𝟓𝟓𝟔 Sage 100 support is a comprehensive business management solution designed for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to streamline their operations, manage finances, track inventory, and facilitate growth. While Sage 100 offers powerful features and functionalities, users may encounter technical issues, require assistance with software implementation, or need guidance on optimizing their workflows. Sage 100 Support 𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓*𝟔𝟎𝟒-𝟖𝟓𝟓𝟔 provides dedicated assistance and resources to help users overcome challenges, maximize the benefits of the software, and ensure smooth business operations. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll delve into the various aspects of Sage 100 Support, including its features, benefits, common issues, troubleshooting techniques, and support options. 1. Understanding Sage 100 Support Sage 100 Support is a specialized service offered by Sage, the developer of Sage 100 ERP software, to assist users with technical issues, software implementation, training, and ongoing support. Whether users encounter software errors, require guidance on configuration settings, or need assistance with system integration, Sage 100 Support offers comprehensive assistance tailored to the needs of SMEs. Let’s explore the key features and benefits of Sage 100 Support: 1.1. Features of Sage 100 Support Technical Assistance: Sage 100 Support 𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓*𝟔𝟎𝟒-𝟖𝟓𝟓𝟔 provides technical assistance to help users troubleshoot software issues, resolve errors, and optimize performance. Implementation Services: Support agents assist users in implementing Sage 100 software, including installation, configuration, data migration, and system setup. Training and Education: Sage 100 Support 𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓*𝟔𝟎𝟒-𝟖𝟓𝟓𝟔 offers training programs, workshops, and educational materials to help users understand the software’s features and functionalities. Customization and Development: Support agents help users customize Sage 100 to meet their specific business needs, including developing custom reports, workflows, and integrations. Ongoing Maintenance and Updates: Sage 100 Support provides ongoing maintenance and updates to ensure that users have access to the latest features, bug fixes, and security patches. 1.2. Benefits of Sage 100 Support Expert Guidance: Users have access to Sage 100 experts who can provide accurate solutions to technical issues and offer personalized assistance. Time Savings: Sage 100 Support helps users resolve software-related tasks quickly, minimizing downtime and allowing them to focus on core business activities. Optimized Performance: By addressing software issues and providing guidance on best practices, support agents help users optimize the performance of Sage 100 ERP software. Enhanced Productivity: Sage 100 Support empowers users to leverage the full capabilities of the software, improving efficiency and productivity across their organization. 2. Common Issues with Sage 100 Despite its robust features and capabilities, users may encounter various issues when using Sage 100 ERP software. Here are some common issues that users may face: 2.1. Software Errors and Bugs Users may encounter software errors, glitches, or unexpected behavior when using Sage 100, which can impact their ability to perform critical tasks. 2.2. Performance Degradation Performance issues such as slow response times, system crashes, or unresponsiveness may occur due to factors such as system overload, inadequate hardware resources, or software configuration issues. 2.3. Data Integrity and Corruption Data integrity issues or data corruption may occur due to factors such as improper data entry, software bugs, or hardware failures, leading to inaccuracies in financial reporting or operational inefficiencies. 2.4. Integration Challenges Integrating Sage 100 with other systems or applications may pose challenges such as data synchronization issues, compatibility issues, or configuration conflicts, impacting the seamless flow of information across the organization. 3. Troubleshooting Sage 100 Issues Sage 100 Support offers various troubleshooting techniques to help users resolve common issues and optimize their experience with the software. Here are some general troubleshooting steps for Sage 100: 3.1. Verify System Requirements Ensure that your hardware and software environment meets the minimum system requirements for running Sage 100 ERP software, including operating system version, processor, memory, and disk space. 3.2. Update Software Check for updates to Sage 100 ERP software and install any available updates to access new features, bug fixes, and performance improvements. 3.3. Review Configuration Settings Review and validate configuration settings in Sage 100 to ensure that they are set up correctly and align with your business requirements. 3.4. Data Cleanup and Maintenance Perform regular data cleanup and maintenance tasks, such as purging old data, optimizing database indexes, and running data integrity checks, to ensure data accuracy and system performance. 3.5. Monitor System Performance Monitor system performance metrics such as CPU usage, memory utilization, and disk I/O to identify potential bottlenecks or performance issues and take corrective actions as needed. 3.6. Engage Sage 100 Support If you encounter issues that you cannot resolve on your own, contact Sage 100 Support for assistance. Provide detailed information about the issue, including error messages, steps to reproduce the problem, and any troubleshooting steps you have already 4. Contacting Sage 100 Support If users encounter issues with Sage 100 that they cannot resolve independently, they can reach out to Sage 100 Support for assistance. Here are some ways to contact support: 4.1. Phone Support Call the Sage 100 Support phone number to speak with a support agent who can provide personalized assistance and guidance. 4.2. Email Support Send an email to Sage 100 Support describing the issue, and a support agent will respond with instructions or troubleshooting steps. 4.3. Online Support Portal Access the Sage 100 online support portal to submit a support ticket, browse knowledge base articles, and engage with the community forums for additional assistance and resources. 4.4. On-Site Support Depending on your support plan and service level agreement (SLA), Sage 100 Support may offer on-site support where a technician visits your location to troubleshoot issues or provide hands-on assistance. 5. Best Practices for Sage 100 Support To maximize the effectiveness of Sage 100 Support and ensure a smooth operation of your ERP system, consider implementing the following best practices: 5.1. Stay Informed Stay informed about updates, patches, and new releases for Sage 100 ERP software by subscribing to newsletters, following official Sage 100 channels, and participating in user forums and communities. 5.2. Document Issues Keep detailed records of any issues, errors, or challenges encountered with Sage 100, including error messages, steps to reproduce the problem, and any troubleshooting steps taken. This information can help expedite the resolution process when contacting support. 5.3. Train Users Provide comprehensive training to users on how to use Sage 100 effectively, including navigation, data entry, reporting, and troubleshooting common issues. Well-trained users are better equipped to identify and resolve minor issues on their own, reducing the reliance on support resources. 5.4. Regular Maintenance Implement a regular maintenance schedule for Sage 100, including database backups, software updates, data cleanup, and performance tuning. Proactive maintenance helps prevent issues before they occur and ensures optimal performance of the ERP system. 5.5. Review SLA Review your service level agreement (SLA) with Sage 100 Support to understand the level of support you are entitled to, including response times, resolution times, and escalation procedures. Ensure that your SLA meets your business needs and expectations. 6. Conclusion Sage 100 Support plays a critical role in helping businesses maximize the benefits of their ERP investment, troubleshoot issues, and ensure smooth business operations. By understanding the features, benefits, and support options available, users can effectively leverage Sage 100 Support to address challenges, optimize their ERP system, and achieve their business objectives. Whether users encounter technical issues, require assistance with software implementation, or need guidance on best practices, Sage 100 Support offers comprehensive assistance and resources to help businesses succeed. With proactive maintenance, regular training, and effective communication with support resources, businesses can harness the full potential of Sage 100 ERP software and drive growth and success in their organization.
×
×
  • Create New...