Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We really rolling with this offensive line?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

It's really weird how fans....fans,  think any football executive is ignoring such an important unit such as the offensive line. 

But as we all know, fans know better/best. 

I mean....

If they aren't ignoring it now,  I'd honestly hate to see what ignoring it actually looked like. It's very hard to argue they've made legitimate efforts to provide the kind of protection you'd hope to get for a new QB in his first season with the team. Drafting one mid round and one late round rookies and adding free agents that exactly zero independent observers are impressed with as legitimate starters? This after the unit has been repeatedly awful for several seasons in a row?

What argument that you would expect an informed neutral observer to accept would you put forward that they have not ignored the OL?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

My biggest fear is that we roll with the line long enough to ruin our chances for the playoffs than Rhule pulls a Rivera and puts the young guys in and we start to dominate.

One or Two games too late. 

That would suck a lot.

Erving and Elflein have extensive injury histories, so I am gonna guess we won't have to wait that long to see the young guys.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

My biggest fear is that we roll with the line long enough to ruin our chances for the playoffs than Rhule pulls a Rivera and puts the young guys in and we start to dominate.

One or Two games too late. 

This team really doesn’t have a chance for playoffs, I would look at next year. We’re not one of the 7 best teams in the nfc yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first 2 teams we play have good DLines.  I think, however, that they are going to give the vets a shot first, meanwhile, all the experience (even if from the sideline) you can give the rookies, you try to give it to them.  Some of you think starting third round OL is the solution. 

That shortens the rookie season, making the "wall" less daunting.  Give them 10 games to play, not 17, and the chance for success is greater.

The Elflein contract was a head scratcher, but they were hoping his athleticism would help.

As for ignoring the OL, if they paid attention to the OL, would you be willing to hand over Marshall?  He was about the 57th pick and we could have grabbed a serviceable rookie in round 2--not great--but serviceable. 
 

It is probably our best bet to pray that Erving holds up at LT to some degree (w/ TE help) and that Christensen, Jordan, and maybe Brown develop quickly.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

We had a different team and quarterback then. Defense was really, really good.

Of course we did.  Our defense is good now.  You act as if this does not happen and that there are conditions--the conditions you describe apply to us.

In 2013, the Chiefs went 11-5 with new QB Alex Smith after going 2-14 the year before.

In 2008 the Dolphins finished 11-5 after nearly going 0-16 the year before--an OT win in week 15 saved them from that fate--and they brought in Chad Pennington. 

Alex Smith and Chad Pennington were no better than Sam Darnold before going to their new teams and turning it around.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Of course we did.  Our defense is good now.  You act as if this does not happen and that there are conditions--the conditions you describe apply to us.

In 2013, the Chiefs went 11-5 with new QB Alex Smith after going 2-14 the year before.

In 2008 the Dolphins finished 11-5 after nearly going 0-16 the year before--an OT win in week 15 saved them from that fate--and they brought in Chad Pennington. 

Alex Smith and Chad Pennington were no better than Sam Darnold before going to their new teams and turning it around.

Smith and Pennington had football smarts and an understanding of the game that was better than the coaches of the teams they had left. 

Darnold fits the pattern, but we're going to have to see if the football IQ and processing speed is there. In his one pre-season performance, it looked kinda promising.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Smith and Pennington had football smarts and an understanding of the game that was better than the coaches of the teams they had left. 

Darnold fits the pattern, but we're going to have to see if the football IQ and processing speed is there. In his one pre-season performance, it looked kinda promising.

I forgot Garropolo in 2019.  They traded for him in 2017 and he won 5 straight.  Then he was hurt in 2018 and they went 4-12.  In 2019, they went 13-3.  Again--not a star QB that cost 3 firsts and 2 seconds--a backup off another team's roster did it.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Smith and Pennington had football smarts and an understanding of the game that was better than the coaches of the teams they had left. 

Darnold fits the pattern, but we're going to have to see if the football IQ and processing speed is there. In his one pre-season performance, it looked kinda promising.

THe OL needs to find its groove.  They are not very choreographed right now.  We will add a player or two throughout the season, but it should improve as we go.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

This team really doesn’t have a chance for playoffs, I would look at next year. We’re not one of the 7 best teams in the nfc yet.

It is way to early to predict this.  We have tons of weapons and a defense that can be really good.

If the defense can carry this team while we figure out a way to resolve our offensive line problems we have a chance to be in the playoffs. Our offense will score some points.  The defense is stingy we could win alot of close games. 

That's just me.  Always optimistic and try to see the good things we have going for us.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...