Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else concerned/disappointed with the lack of touches for the backup RBs and CMC's sustained workload?


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Kind of a double edged sword.  If we are driving and CMC is doing a large part of the offense.   Do you give him a spell and our offense stalls or do we gamble that the backups are going to come in and get us similar yards. 

I think Hubbard has the ability to bring a similar effectiveness to our offense.  Rhule has to give him some valuable time.   One or two plays a week isn't going to cut it.  If Rhule isn't going to give him the ball than why waste a draft pick on a player you aren't going to give a chance.

Secondly, God forbid he goes down again,  Hubbard has little or no game time experience and that will hurt us more.  

My belief is Rhule is scared to take him out and stall a drive.  In fact, I think he's terrified. 

Yeah, I think they know that offense is at least a portion based on smoke and mirrors at the moment. The weaknesses in the OL are being covered up by scheme and CMC. 

As many weapons as we have on offense, we may have some fatal flaws on that side of the ball. We will see what it looks like in a few weeks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the best RB in the last 20 yrs of NFL history had no problem playing at an elite level while getting close to (in some cases, more) 400 in a season. In most of these cases, the majority of their touches came on rushing plays, which is (on average) way more taxing on the body than getting hit on passing plays.


Tomlinson, Alexander, Holmes, Faulk. Faulk's workload, especially 1998-2002 closely resembles what we can expect from CMC in the next years.

Those elite RBs didn't have access to all the tools and recovery options RBs have these days. Hell, we have an entire department charged with analyzing data about player's performance and health.
You can make a counter case about NFL players getting bigger and faster, but being raised as an athlete like CMC was from a very young age, as far as recovery and prevention, plays a bigger role in that.


On another note, I wasn't really pleased with our offensive efficiency. But you gotta consider how our offensive scheme works. It's not like we force-fed the ball to CMC. It was probably more the result of our coaching staff's gameplan. 9 reception were the result of the Jets defensive calls. They were bringing pressure and covering our best receivers with their best defenders. In this scheme, the O# takes what the D# gives

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Idk why late in the game when they were clearly milking the clock they didn’t feed Hubbard. They keep using Mccaffrey like this they will learn the learn the hard way on why teams don’t give his giant contracts to RB. 

Yet another fan that doesn't understand why CMC gets paid. 

 

Sad. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

Chubba didn't even get one rush. I don't understand it. He obviously was not a receiving back in college. Why not give him a few touches to settle him in. The season is 17 games long now, and that doesn't include the post season. Hopefully, Royce gets up to speed quickly. We need some rotation. 

Why would you rush Chubba when the best RB in football is on the roster? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

Okay, fair point. 🤗

If He Dies Ivan Drago GIF

If it is a blowout and we don't really need every single play to be a gainer, hell put anyone in at running back. But in close games like that you need your game breaker taking every running rep possible. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't want to bitch but was wondering the same thing. It felt like we are going to run him into the ground again just like previous years. I understand using a star player you are paying TONS of money but how about also using the talent we have behind him who was drafted and who we picked up off waivers. These guys seem more than capable as well upon watching them. Is it a bad thing to have fresh legs constantly in and your star player getting good rest for the long haul?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Zod said:

If it is a blowout and we don't really need every single play to be a gainer, hell put anyone in at running back. But in close games like that you need your game breaker taking every running rep possible. 

From the very beginning? For 17 weeks? I don't know man. If he wasn't such a receiving option then I could probably agree. But you know we are gonna get him a lot of touches that way as well. He isn't the one to be running out of bounds either. And he doesn't like going down on first contact like ever. Dude falls forward even when it's against the laws of physics. You don't think it's wise to somewhat limit his touches? Or are you saying we should limit his touches by throwing to other people and letting him take the massive bulk of rushes? If not, you really don't think we are over-using him? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what u saw last year from Rhule, he seemed more wling to play young guys over vets as time went on. This was the first game of the season and we needed to start off with a win and CMC getting so many touches is the best chance to to that.

I'm hoping the Chuba and some of the other young guys get a chance as the year goes on like the young guys got last year. Would really like to see Brady and Deonte get a chance on the OL at guard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I didn’t like this draft at all. XL, our first pick had one good season out of five and doesn’t have burst off the line.  I wanted Ladd here because I think he’d have been a much better pairing for BY9s weak arm.  We need to be an excellent west coast style offense if Bryce is gonna shine.  A burner that takes 3 steps to get moving and doesn’t separate at the line is a bad choice IMO. I don’t even want to talk about drafting a RB after having Foreman make us feel better about trading CMC only to send him packing and give Sanders top FA money last year to fall on his face.  We always try to get cute and find value.  The fact that we were the first team to take a RB (one recovering from a serious injury no less) tells you we didn’t get the memo 31 other teams got.  RB has a huge role in protection responsibility, it’s a huge reason some great backs are situational…they suck in protection.  A rookie RB helping protect BY doesn’t warm my heart.  We should have taken the top C on the board here IMO. LB and yet another project TE that’ll probably just frustrate us all for how long he hangs around seemingly doing nothing.  Then a bunch of dice rolls that aren’t changing any fortune unless it’s a complete accident. TLDR This whole draft looks like JAGs to me at best.  I don’t like the XL or JB picks at all.  Always happy to be wrong when I have a negative take.
    • I'll tell you how you should benefit from using this in a moment. However, things are alright now. You might have to be really skilled to use their find effectively. I'm not the most ideal customer when it is put alongside that condition. Here are the pros. I put my foot in my mouth. I had high expectations. We'll face up to reality. My notion is based around my assumption that nobody has a partiality concerning doing that. There is a culture that has been built around some hindrance and also you should understand how some command will impact your life. Really honestly, if you actually reckon about it, how good is that stuff? Whenever somebody experiences the doohickey, it is best that they do not hesitate to talk to a professional.    OFFICIAL WEBSITE ----> https://www.onlymyhealth.com/sugar-defender-reviews-blood-sugar-supplement-complaints-1709036624   Go Down For More Info:-   https://www.onlymyhealth.com/puravive-reviews-side-effects-and-complaints-1709979035 https://www.onlymyhealth.com/fitspresso-reviews-coffee-loophole-recipe-dangerous-side-effects-and-complaints-1710235827   https://medium.com/@lancebrum/sugar-defender-buyer-beware-heres-the-real-story-must-read-cfbe26c6a174 https://hackmd.io/@lancebrum/SugarDefender https://www.eventogo.com/event/sugar-defender-supplement-what-you-should-be-aware-in-update-2024/ https://www.techdirectory.io/new-york/adtech/sugar-defender https://gamma.app/docs/Sugar-Defender-Buyer-Beware-Heres-The-Real-Story-Must-Read-7vy0ew8b8doq9hm https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/59f21551-e405-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://pgccouncilcsp.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/604e7f79-e405-ef11-a73d-001dd806eee4 https://thecontingent.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/5f1e49b0-e405-ef11-a73d-6045bd01c1cc https://twor.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/support-forum/1bf52a1d-e505-ef11-a73d-6045bd3fd1cb
    • Fit Flare Keto ACV Gummies Reviews:>> DISCRIPTION =>> Fit Flare Keto ACV Gummies are the freshest dietary help available with the ketogenic hypothesis as its primary approach to working. They are proficient and intended to help your ketogenic way of life. It, yet are they and how would they attempt to support your energy levels and work on your general wellbeing? These chewy candies have exogenous ketones as their fundamental fixing which might assist your body with accomplishing a ketosis state in a more limited period while remaining more powerful. Fit Flare Keto ACV Gummies will function as a surge of ketones into your body, which might bring about you involving ketones for energy creation rather than customary carbs. Further, these chewy candies might assist with delivering the put away fat in your body too, notwithstanding which you would be vigorously centered around weight the executives OFFICIAL WESITES :>> https://www.facebook.com/people/Fit-Flare-Keto-ACV-Gummies/61558711963705/ https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61558711963705 https://sites.google.com/view/fit-flare-keto-acv-gummies-buy/home https://medium.com/@FitFlareKetoACVGummiesBuy/fit-flare-keto-acv-gummies-investigating-benefits-shocking-reviews-2024-official-website-4f5120560c4a https://fit-flare-keto-acv-gummies-get.company.site/ https://groups.google.com/g/fit-flare-keto-acv-gummies-buy/c/02c13PxYkXA https://fitflareketoacvgummies.godaddysites.com/
×
×
  • Create New...