Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pass Block Win Rate through week 1 (ESPN)


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Zod said:

Found this on Twitter.

 

Pass Block Win Rate through week 1 (ESPN):

CLE-78%
PHI-75%
SF-69%
GB, NYG-67%
CIN-62%
DEN, MIN, NO-59%
JAX-58%
LAR-56%
MIA, TB-55%
SEA-54%
TEN-53%
LAC-52%
LV-51%
ARI, BAL, NYJ, PIT-50%
DET-48%
IND-47%
NE-44%
BUF-41%
CHI, KC-40%
ATL-36%
DAL, HOU-35%
WAS-33%
CAR-20%

 

 

 

 

Yeeeeesh. Panthers lose pass blocking 4 out of 5 times.

You couldn't see that watching the game?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ChuckWag78 said:

How does this correlate to the game? I dont remember Sam running for his life. 

 

 

25 minutes ago, Zod said:

Pretty sure they measure how much time he had to throw. Apparently it's the worst in the league. Credit to Sam for working with it.

Several vary wise throw aways, A few shifty subtle moves to get the ball off ect. Also clears up the "he didn't throw downfeild enough argument imo"

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Cue the Saint's D watching game film and completely failing to miss OL ineptitude being saved by a bajillion dump off passes to CMC.

Cue the Saint's D cordinator coming up with a game plan that amounts to: smother CMC in close, rush 4 to get to Darnold, dare everybody else to beat us before we pound Darnold's face into the ground.

Sam only has so long to work with it before opposing game plans adjust.


Thats exactly how this season will go. We always knew it would.

Contain CMC and dare Darnold to throw.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

I wonder how this is even calculated though?  Wouldn't this correlate with an enormous amount of pressures and sacks?

Otherwise...

Stephen Colbert No GIF

Pass blocking is all about losing slowly, My understanding is that it's based on the time it takes to lose a block, We schemed quite a few free runs at Wilson I don't think it counts if they remain unblocked.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...