Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 2 Coaching


OceanPanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think many of us were questioning the coaching after a week 1 win.  Red Zone in specific. 

Week 2  brings the last4 seasons NFC South division champion into town.  The coaching staff rose to the occasion.

Will we win all these matchups against perineal  winners ?   Probably not, but I think we can all agree we saw enough yesterday that with the current players we can count on the coaches to make us very competitive.  ( Stay Healthy Panthers )

Rhule    A

Brady B+ 

Snow A +  Basically  pitched a shutout 

Blackburn B-

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No more trying to use CMC as a power back on the goal line. Please and thank you. 
 

Id knock Brady down to a B- and Rhule down to an A- and Blackburn down to a D.

Brady and Rhule for leaving 10–17 points on the table again and again not properly adjusting in a second half. Points like those are gonna matter down the road. Blackburn is obvious why. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I agree about CMC not being a power back on the goal line, but I just don't think we have the blocking personnel to win those matchups. 

Depends on how we use them.

We've got a very West Coast line but yesterday we tried to use them as if we were a power running team.

Didn't go so well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

No more trying to use CMC as a power back on the goal line. Please and thank you. 
 

Id knock Brady down to a B- and Rhule down to an A- and Blackburn down to a D.

Brady and Rhule for leaving 10–17 points on the table. Blackburn is obvious why. 

I tend to agree with your grade. The offense cannot continue to leave that many points on the field and expect to win games.  When they get that sorted out I would put these kids up against anyone. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the B- for Blackburn  is very generous.  Special teams were awful yesterday...10 men on the field, gave up big returns, blocking on FG...well...they did not.  Can't find a kicker (situation is embarrassing).  I give him a D at best.

 

Also...Rhule...going to blame him for the poor 3rd qtr performances .  The team has been terrible in the 3rd qtr in every game Rhule has coached.  Looks like the opposition makes adjustments..our coaching staff does not anticipate them or have an answer for them. This will cost us games (and has). B here for me...Brady B-.

Edited by ladypanther
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I agree about CMC not being a power back on the goal line, but I just don't think we have the blocking personnel to win those matchups.  I'm not sure it would matter who was taking the handoff.  It was good to see Brady call a quick pass play after that didn't work a few times, and Sam hit DJ on a quick slant for a TD.

Totally agree. I just figure if we are gonna do it, call some plays that let CMC take control away from a collapsing line and showcase his ability. Such as that inside(I think it was inside the 10) the 10 run where he scored. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

No more trying to use CMC as a power back on the goal line. Please and thank you. 
 

Id knock Brady down to a B- and Rhule down to an A- and Blackburn down to a D.

Brady and Rhule for leaving 10–17 points on the table again and again not properly adjusting in a second half. Points like those are gonna matter down the road. Blackburn is obvious why. 

Yeah give the rock to Royce Freeman on the goal line. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Depends on how we use them.

We've got a very West Coast line but yesterday we tried to use them as if we were a power running team.

Didn't go so well.

Exactly. Our line isn't really built for goal line sets. It's pretty stupid to even attempt them honestly. I mean I guess you can attempt to say that we need to keep the defense honest or whatever, but I'd rather just run plays that have a legit chance to succeed within our personnel. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

I think many of us were questioning the coaching after a week 1 win.  Red Zone in specific. 

Week 2  brings the last4 seasons NFC South division champion into town.  The coaching staff rose to the occasion.

Will we win all these matchups against perineal  winners ?   Probably not, but I think we can all agree we saw enough yesterday that with the current players we can count on the coaches to make us very competitive.  ( Stay Healthy Panthers )

Rhule    A

Brady B+ 

Snow A +  Basically  pitched a shutout 

Blackburn B-

 

 

We went stale in the 2nd half again on offense, that’s going to end up catching up with us. Early in the 4th we should have been working on trying to get the run game going and killing clock instead of dumping and dinking 3-5yd passes

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...