Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next year's 1st for Laremy Tunsil who says no?


RIPTreyLance
 Share

Recommended Posts

Now that we've got this Texans game out of the way they should have no reason to want to withhold him from us if given the right offer.

He was tossing Brian burns around last night like he was a ragdoll. We are 31st in pass block rating in the NFL.  Perfect storm? 

If we're just going to draft a tackle next year anyway I don't see why not...

  • Poo 29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/laremy-tunsil/10647
 

I mean he has given up 0 sacks and has no penalties but I do think they over paid for him in terms of the two first rounders. Doubt we get a better OT in round one next year given that we'll be drafting at least around 20+ so I don't see why people would say it's a dumb idea considering he's 27.

He restructured his deal and I don't know what that entails but the money could be what funks it up? I don't care enough to look up his salary but the ability is there and the value is too if the money isn't goofed.

But also probably around a 100% chance they don't do it though...like why would they trade one of the best pass blockers.

 

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/laremy-tunsil/10647
 

I mean he has given up 0 sacks and has no penalties but I do think they over paid for him in terms of the two first rounders. Doubt we get a better OT in round one next year given that we'll be drafting at least around 20+ so I don't see why people would say it's a dumb idea considering he's 27.

He restructured his deal and I don't know what that entaisl but the money could be what funks it up? I don't care enough to look up his salary but the ability is there and the value is too if the money isn't goofed.

But also probably around a 100% chance they don't do it though...like why would they trade one of the best pass blockers.

 

They're heading into rebuild mode. Tunsils ability won't help the team enough to win anyway. And they could fetch more picks for the rebuild 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...