Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Respect for the Panthers - What Cowboys Fans are Saying

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Luciu5 Veteran

Luciu5

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ParsonsInYoFace said:

And welcome to the OPPONENTS stadium. Hopefully its a good game. 😏

You and the other guy and the guy sucking on Dak Prescott's dick or whatever are all the same person, aren't you?

Also weird name.  Micah has how many sacks this year so far?  Not very many.  In fact your ENTIRE TEAM has less sacks than ONE of our DE's. 

So when you say Parsonsinyourface, you mean at a pleasant respectful distance, huh? 😂

You know Dak is going to spend a lot of time on his back on Sunday right?  You know our dline put up numbers against all pro tackles right?

Come back with a Zeke name please.  I got some stuff to say about that run game too.  Or Pollard or whomever.  I know Zeke is kinda washed up at this point

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DakInYourMouths Rookie

DakInYourMouths

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

You and the other guy and the guy sucking on Dak Prescott's dick or whatever are all the same person, aren't you?

Also weird name.  Micah has how many sacks this year so far?  Not very many.  In fact your ENTIRE TEAM has less sacks than ONE of our DE's. 

So when you say Parsonsinyourface, you mean at a pleasant respectful distance, huh? 😂

You know Dak is going to spend a lot of time on his back on Sunday right?  You know our dline put up numbers against all pro tackles right?

Come back with a Zeke name please.  I got some stuff to say about that run game too.  Or Pollard or whomever.  I know Zeke is kinda washed up at this point

 

 

not sure why “inyourface” has to mean sacks, especially considering the incredible amount of pressures/hurries he’s had in his 3 game career.   Darnold will get acquainted tho, you can bet on that.  I’d put the over/under on Dak sacks at 3, same number of tds.   And id be the house that Mr “seeing ghosts” falls more.   As far as zeke, wake me up when he misses a game due too injury.  Guess his tissue just isn’t quite as soft as Christian’s lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, DakInYourMouths said:

 

 

not sure why “inyourface” has to mean sacks, especially considering the incredible amount of pressures/hurries he’s had in his 3 game career.   Darnold will get acquainted tho, you can bet on that.  I’d put the over/under on Dak sacks at 3, same number of tds.   And id be the house that Mr “seeing ghosts” falls more.   As far as zeke, wake me up when he misses a game due too injury.  Guess his tissue just isn’t quite as soft as Christian’s lmao

Parsons is good but can he get to Sam before he throws it quick?

Sam already has experience playing behind sub-par O-Lines so he'd be looking to get rid of the ball fast and I don't think Parsons is fast enough to get to him before  he does so.   Just my own two cents.

Sam is also more elusive than he looks (and stronger than he looks) if Parsons or someone else from the Cowboys gets close to him.   Not saying he's Patrick Mahomes or Lamar Jackson but he's got deceptive quickness when the need arises(I mean he has experience running for his life after all). 🤭

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moo Daeng Experienced

Moo Daeng

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, DakInYourMouths said:

 

 

not sure why “inyourface” has to mean sacks, especially considering the incredible amount of pressures/hurries he’s had in his 3 game career.   Darnold will get acquainted tho, you can bet on that.  I’d put the over/under on Dak sacks at 3, same number of tds.   And id be the house that Mr “seeing ghosts” falls more.   As far as zeke, wake me up when he misses a game due too injury.  Guess his tissue just isn’t quite as soft as Christian’s lmao

Fortunate for us your pass rush outside of him is non existent. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlackPanther21_ Grand Master

BlackPanther21_

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, DakInYourMouths said:

 

 

not sure why “inyourface” has to mean sacks, especially considering the incredible amount of pressures/hurries he’s had in his 3 game career.   Darnold will get acquainted tho, you can bet on that.  I’d put the over/under on Dak sacks at 3, same number of tds.   And id be the house that Mr “seeing ghosts” falls more.   As far as zeke, wake me up when he misses a game due too injury.  Guess his tissue just isn’t quite as soft as Christian’s lmao

CMC is better with one healthy hamstring than Zeke is with two 😂

Not to mention one plays behind one of the best O lines (when healthy), while the other plays behind a bunch of XFLers.

Edited by BlackPanther21_
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ParsonsInYoFace Apprentice

ParsonsInYoFace

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, Luciu5 said:

You and the other guy and the guy sucking on Dak Prescott's dick or whatever are all the same person, aren't you?

Also weird name.  Micah has how many sacks this year so far?  Not very many.  In fact your ENTIRE TEAM has less sacks than ONE of our DE's. 

So when you say Parsonsinyourface, you mean at a pleasant respectful distance, huh? 😂

You know Dak is going to spend a lot of time on his back on Sunday right?  You know our dline put up numbers against all pro tackles right?

Come back with a Zeke name please.  I got some stuff to say about that run game too.  Or Pollard or whomever.  I know Zeke is kinda washed up at this point

lol...your DE's has more sacks because you played the freakin Jets and Texans. 😂

Watch #11, he's gonna wreak havok on Darnold and have you all pissed off. Just watch.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Luciu5 Veteran

Luciu5

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, ParsonsInYoFace said:

lol...your DE's has more sacks because you played the freakin Jets and Texans. 😂

Watch #11, he's gonna wreak havok on Darnold and have you all pissed off. Just watch.

Burns and Reddick have had sacks in every single game, including against the Saints bookend pro bowler left and right tackles.  We DOMINATED the Saints oline.  I think you have a better oline so instead of 4 we'll have 3.  Oh they are the only duo in the league with both having a sack every week btw.  Also we have 17 players on our roster with QB hits.

We have dominated lesser teams.  It's what we were supposed to do.  Y'all don't know what's coming your way.  I'm not sure if it's funny or sad.  I just hope your players think the same as you.  The Saints did and they left that game much more humble after we curb stomped them.  Nobody thought we'd win that game either after they destroyed GB.  You really think y'all are going to put up triple our average pts allowed?  The Saints put up 7 pts against compared to how many in their other games? You think you're the only explosive offense in the league?  Win or lose tomorrow is going to be fun.  Dak is getting hit early and often and just because of you, THAT is what I'll root for this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ParsonsInYoFace Apprentice

ParsonsInYoFace

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Burns and Reddick have had sacks in every single game, including against the Saints bookend pro bowler left and right tackles.  We DOMINATED the Saints oline.  I think you have a better oline so instead of 4 we'll have 3.  Oh they are the only duo in the league with both having a sack every week btw.  Also we have 17 players on our roster with QB hits.

We have dominated lesser teams.  It's what we were supposed to do.  Y'all don't know what's coming your way.  I'm not sure if it's funny or sad.  I just hope your players think the same as you.  The Saints did and they left that game much more humble after we curb stomped them.  Nobody thought we'd win that game either after they destroyed GB.  You really think y'all are going to put up triple our average pts allowed?  The Saints put up 7 pts against compared to how many in their other games? You think you're the only explosive offense in the league?  Win or lose tomorrow is going to be fun.  Dak is getting hit early and often and just because of you, THAT is what I'll root for this game.

ok man, we could argue all night long. I believe we both have up and coming teams. we just need to see what happens. Lets have a good game and I'll talk to you tomorrow, win or lose. Good luck and be safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...