Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Respect for the Panthers - What Cowboys Fans are Saying


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ParsonsInYoFace said:

And welcome to the OPPONENTS stadium. Hopefully its a good game. 😏

You and the other guy and the guy sucking on Dak Prescott's dick or whatever are all the same person, aren't you?

Also weird name.  Micah has how many sacks this year so far?  Not very many.  In fact your ENTIRE TEAM has less sacks than ONE of our DE's. 

So when you say Parsonsinyourface, you mean at a pleasant respectful distance, huh? 😂

You know Dak is going to spend a lot of time on his back on Sunday right?  You know our dline put up numbers against all pro tackles right?

Come back with a Zeke name please.  I got some stuff to say about that run game too.  Or Pollard or whomever.  I know Zeke is kinda washed up at this point

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

You and the other guy and the guy sucking on Dak Prescott's dick or whatever are all the same person, aren't you?

Also weird name.  Micah has how many sacks this year so far?  Not very many.  In fact your ENTIRE TEAM has less sacks than ONE of our DE's. 

So when you say Parsonsinyourface, you mean at a pleasant respectful distance, huh? 😂

You know Dak is going to spend a lot of time on his back on Sunday right?  You know our dline put up numbers against all pro tackles right?

Come back with a Zeke name please.  I got some stuff to say about that run game too.  Or Pollard or whomever.  I know Zeke is kinda washed up at this point

 

 

not sure why “inyourface” has to mean sacks, especially considering the incredible amount of pressures/hurries he’s had in his 3 game career.   Darnold will get acquainted tho, you can bet on that.  I’d put the over/under on Dak sacks at 3, same number of tds.   And id be the house that Mr “seeing ghosts” falls more.   As far as zeke, wake me up when he misses a game due too injury.  Guess his tissue just isn’t quite as soft as Christian’s lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DakInYourMouths said:

 

 

not sure why “inyourface” has to mean sacks, especially considering the incredible amount of pressures/hurries he’s had in his 3 game career.   Darnold will get acquainted tho, you can bet on that.  I’d put the over/under on Dak sacks at 3, same number of tds.   And id be the house that Mr “seeing ghosts” falls more.   As far as zeke, wake me up when he misses a game due too injury.  Guess his tissue just isn’t quite as soft as Christian’s lmao

Parsons is good but can he get to Sam before he throws it quick?

Sam already has experience playing behind sub-par O-Lines so he'd be looking to get rid of the ball fast and I don't think Parsons is fast enough to get to him before  he does so.   Just my own two cents.

Sam is also more elusive than he looks (and stronger than he looks) if Parsons or someone else from the Cowboys gets close to him.   Not saying he's Patrick Mahomes or Lamar Jackson but he's got deceptive quickness when the need arises(I mean he has experience running for his life after all). 🤭

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DakInYourMouths said:

 

 

not sure why “inyourface” has to mean sacks, especially considering the incredible amount of pressures/hurries he’s had in his 3 game career.   Darnold will get acquainted tho, you can bet on that.  I’d put the over/under on Dak sacks at 3, same number of tds.   And id be the house that Mr “seeing ghosts” falls more.   As far as zeke, wake me up when he misses a game due too injury.  Guess his tissue just isn’t quite as soft as Christian’s lmao

Fortunate for us your pass rush outside of him is non existent. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DakInYourMouths said:

 

 

not sure why “inyourface” has to mean sacks, especially considering the incredible amount of pressures/hurries he’s had in his 3 game career.   Darnold will get acquainted tho, you can bet on that.  I’d put the over/under on Dak sacks at 3, same number of tds.   And id be the house that Mr “seeing ghosts” falls more.   As far as zeke, wake me up when he misses a game due too injury.  Guess his tissue just isn’t quite as soft as Christian’s lmao

CMC is better with one healthy hamstring than Zeke is with two 😂

Not to mention one plays behind one of the best O lines (when healthy), while the other plays behind a bunch of XFLers.

Edited by BlackPanther21_
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Luciu5 said:

You and the other guy and the guy sucking on Dak Prescott's dick or whatever are all the same person, aren't you?

Also weird name.  Micah has how many sacks this year so far?  Not very many.  In fact your ENTIRE TEAM has less sacks than ONE of our DE's. 

So when you say Parsonsinyourface, you mean at a pleasant respectful distance, huh? 😂

You know Dak is going to spend a lot of time on his back on Sunday right?  You know our dline put up numbers against all pro tackles right?

Come back with a Zeke name please.  I got some stuff to say about that run game too.  Or Pollard or whomever.  I know Zeke is kinda washed up at this point

lol...your DE's has more sacks because you played the freakin Jets and Texans. 😂

Watch #11, he's gonna wreak havok on Darnold and have you all pissed off. Just watch.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ParsonsInYoFace said:

lol...your DE's has more sacks because you played the freakin Jets and Texans. 😂

Watch #11, he's gonna wreak havok on Darnold and have you all pissed off. Just watch.

Burns and Reddick have had sacks in every single game, including against the Saints bookend pro bowler left and right tackles.  We DOMINATED the Saints oline.  I think you have a better oline so instead of 4 we'll have 3.  Oh they are the only duo in the league with both having a sack every week btw.  Also we have 17 players on our roster with QB hits.

We have dominated lesser teams.  It's what we were supposed to do.  Y'all don't know what's coming your way.  I'm not sure if it's funny or sad.  I just hope your players think the same as you.  The Saints did and they left that game much more humble after we curb stomped them.  Nobody thought we'd win that game either after they destroyed GB.  You really think y'all are going to put up triple our average pts allowed?  The Saints put up 7 pts against compared to how many in their other games? You think you're the only explosive offense in the league?  Win or lose tomorrow is going to be fun.  Dak is getting hit early and often and just because of you, THAT is what I'll root for this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Burns and Reddick have had sacks in every single game, including against the Saints bookend pro bowler left and right tackles.  We DOMINATED the Saints oline.  I think you have a better oline so instead of 4 we'll have 3.  Oh they are the only duo in the league with both having a sack every week btw.  Also we have 17 players on our roster with QB hits.

We have dominated lesser teams.  It's what we were supposed to do.  Y'all don't know what's coming your way.  I'm not sure if it's funny or sad.  I just hope your players think the same as you.  The Saints did and they left that game much more humble after we curb stomped them.  Nobody thought we'd win that game either after they destroyed GB.  You really think y'all are going to put up triple our average pts allowed?  The Saints put up 7 pts against compared to how many in their other games? You think you're the only explosive offense in the league?  Win or lose tomorrow is going to be fun.  Dak is getting hit early and often and just because of you, THAT is what I'll root for this game.

ok man, we could argue all night long. I believe we both have up and coming teams. we just need to see what happens. Lets have a good game and I'll talk to you tomorrow, win or lose. Good luck and be safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...