Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold’s Upside


HardcoreHokie
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We have people crying in here because I've pointed out that suggesting that any developing QB's floor is a guy coming off a 3800 yard, 33 TD, 7 INT season is absurd. That's not a knock on Sam Darnold in anyway shape or form. It's a knock on certain posters' having room temperature IQs for not realizing how absurd of a comparison that is. I'm not knocking Sam. I'm knocking y'all. And laughing at y'all.

tenor.gif&f=1&nofb=1

 

 

 

Ryan Tannehill has a vary up &  down career and to pick one of his good years to say, that is the QB,  makes Tannehill look better than he is .  He was a "bad decision maker" and "turn over machine" as some would say, several years in Miami.

It appears that the careers and the floors of the two QBs are very similar.  To say that Sam can be better than Ryan Tannehill is not out of the realm of possibly.  He  is playing better than Tannehill now by nearly every measure, behind a worse OL by most measures and at this point with a rookie RB.

 

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

But man, Sam is off to a great start.

He is. 

I've saved the posts from those two that said Sam was a bad QB.  I'm waiting until the end of the regular season, but at some point those who are backpedaling now,  I will reply with their own posts.  

I never anticipated Sam would be setting a NFL rushing touchdown record here.  He is playing very well, and if history is any guide...he gets BETTER later in the season.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Ryan Tannehill has a vary up &  down career and to pick one of his good years to say, that is the QB,  makes Tannehill look better than he is .  He was a "bad decision maker" and "turn over machine" as some would say, several years in Miami.

It appears that the careers and the floors of the two QBs are very similar.  To say that Sam can be better than Ryan Tannehill is not out of the realm of possibly.  He  is playing better than Tannehill now by nearly every measure, behind a worse OL by most measures and at this point with a rookie RB.

 

To say his FLOOR is a QB who has been very good his past several years in Tennessee would be wrong. Tannehill has proven he can play good football with the right system/players. Darnold looks like he has so far this season, but to call a proven solid NFL QB his FLOOR is a stretch. If that’s his floor, meaning the absolute worst he can be, go ahead and extend him 5 years. Any decent staff can get a player to play above his FLOOR. We have already seen Darnold’s floor. It’s the Jets Darnold and he has already shown he can be much better than that. He also doesn’t have the arm talent for Rodgers to be his ceiling. Darnold has a gear arm, but Rodgers is just on another level. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, joemac said:

I was being sarcastic dude. The real list is very short.

1. Cam Newton

2. Jake Delhomme 

3. Steve Beurlein

4. Kerry Collins

I think Sam can easily be better than Kerry.

5pvch4.jpg

5pvcvi.jpg

5pvcx7.jpg

I'm only putting up his time in Carolina because that's what's relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

I've saved the posts from those two that said Sam was a bad QB.  I'm waiting until the end of the regular season, but at some point those who are backpedaling now,  I will reply with their own posts. 

Are you going to speak to the manager too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

They equal 6 points just like Passing ones.   I don't see what the issue is.  🤷‍♂️

There should be no issue, but since when does an agenda require a valid issue?  Points are points.
 

you and I know Sam has never been a running QB, but he is a mobile QB who appears to be taking what the defense  is giving him….and for the last four games, those defenses have given him open lanes to run in TDs.   He looks to me like he’s gliding them in, not bulldozing his way in.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 1usctrojan said:

There should be no issue, but since when does an agenda require a valid issue?  Points are points.
 

you and I know Sam has never been a running QB, but he is a mobile QB who appears to be taking what the defense  is giving him….and for the last four games, those defenses have given him open lanes to run in TDs.   He looks to me like he’s gliding them in, not bulldozing his way in.

Although his most previous TD, he kind of bulldozed a CB but I get your point. 

 

He also had that QB Sneak where he was squashed from both sides while getting into the endzone.

 

But aside from that, yeah.  He's been gliding them in.  🙂

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnold looks better than advertised right now. We are still waiting to see if he has the clutch gene and can put the team on his back. 
 

Talent wise he’s second to Cam. Skill wise I’d put him below Delhommes prime. But Darnolds arm talent is no doubt the best we’ve seen apart from Cam.

It’s hard to categorize his ceiling because he’s bigger than Rodgers, slimmer than Big Ben, but faster. Cannon arm with at times elite accuracy. Can be mobile and make the defense pay at any moment. 
 

If I had to compare him to anyone it would honestly be a slower version of Cam right now that plays the scheme versus the scheme designed around him. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...