Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cowboys Waive offensive tackle Brandon Knight.


ichigo1057
 Share

Recommended Posts

LT Brandon Knight was waived by the Cowboys. I know people are probably thinking "Who?" but given the crap we have on our line do you guys think it might be worth it to put in a claim on him and see what he can do for us? I don't know much about him though some of the Dallas articles I've read stated he has Guard/Tackle flexibility. He is likely to go back onto the Dallas practice squad if nobody puts in a claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, @bonafidebanter said:

Do not touch this guy. He's just as bad as Cam Erving. If not worse. No disrespect to Mr. Erving at all. 

The question is, is he better than Daley at RG or Christiansen at LT? Cam and Elflein may see more time out, and if he can play on par, we could use him. 

 I do not want to repeat last weeks experiment.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

The question is, is he better than Daley at RG or Christiansen at LT? Cam and Elflein may see more time out, and if he can play on par, we could use him. 

 I do not want to repeat last weeks experiment.  

This. Erving had probably been our second beat OL prior to getting hurt. All he needs to be is better than our worst.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sure. Why not?

We're at the point we have to take scraps, might as well be scraps off of one of if not the best OLs in the NFL.

That was what I was thinking as well. I'm not sure where we are in the waiver order but I'd definitely try for him given our problems. Most articles I see about him talk him up though some of them do mention he has issues with Speed Rushers when playing LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ichigo1057 said:

That was what I was thinking as well. I'm not sure where we are in the waiver order but I'd definitely try for him given our problems. Most articles I see about him talk him up though some of them do mention he has issues with Speed Rushers when playing LT.

Our biggest issues are along the IOL, so that's fine by me. Christensen was good enough last week that I think he should continue starting and developing at OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you fling poo at the wall to see what sticks, you're still going to be stuck with poo.

Sorry, just not interested. With this league being as OL needy as it is, unemployed OL are unemployed for a reason. They suck. We have enough of that here. Don't want more.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rayzor said:

If you fling poo at the wall to see what sticks, you're still going to be stuck with poo.

Sorry, just not interested. With this league being as OL needy as it is, unemployed OL are unemployed for a reason. They suck. We have enough of that here. Don't want more.

He could just be buried on the depth chart in Dallas with that excellent line they have.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...