Team designed around CMC. Can’t wi. Without him

[Uwontdoit81]

13 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Don’t count on it 

Right.  Beat the Giants, Lose to Falcons.

[mc52beast]

This team is built around CMC? If it was we wouldn’t have starters on the o-line looking like they just started playing football.

[ClawOn]

Yes this is true. It was a gamble. We would likely be 5-1 with CMC. Other than being elite, he masks the O line weaknesses,  forces defenses to limit blitzes. 

He got hurt. Maybe he'll never play a full season again. Lost the bet. New plan next season. 

[Fox007]

For real someone explain the part where this offense is designed around anything or anyone...

Which picks, which moves, what? This offense is willy nilly no matter who is in. CMCs plays have been similar to Cams it's not designed or built around its "save me jeebus" and that's it.

[Swsmays1]

CMC being set up for a trade

[TDGone]

46 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Well I’m sure this post will not go over well

but as a friend of mine said, the   offense is designed around CMC and without him, they can’t win

Sadly, he is right 

they won’t win until he returns 

They lean on CMC not designed , if so this is a poo design 

[FugginPoo]

When did we make the playoffs with him?

[Fox007]

2 minutes ago, TDGone said:

They lean on CMC not designed , if so this is a poo design 

No one has laid out any designs or builds....it doesn't exist.

 

[raleigh-panther]

2 minutes ago, FugginPoo said:

When did we make the playoffs with him?

I didn’t say they did 

you have seen the results last year and this year, what does it tell you 

[TDGone]

37 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

They basically had a whole season without him and still don't know what to do. Hubbard is basically at the same yards per rush attempt as CMC yet we only ran 16 times today? Pretty sure 10 more rushes would have equaled at least 1 or 2 more field goals at minimum. Def on that horrible drive at the end of the 2nd I believe it was. It all kinda blurred together today

Running against the Vikes is not the same as running on the Saints. Let’s see what Hubbard does if goes up against the Bucs D.We want to get away from giving the same back 25 rushes or 30 touches a game so why should we do that with Hubbard

[TDGone]

3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

No one has laid out any designs or builds....it doesn't exist.

 

Agree with you 100 percent. They new what they had in CMC in 2017 yet no investment in top o line or QB. They wanted CMC to sell tickets because Rhule is Defense minded coach and wanted to start that rebuild first. That’s why I was hoping we would have landed a more offense minded coach .

[Fox007]

Just now, TDGone said:

Agree with you 100 percent. They new what they had in CMC in 2017 yet no investment in top o line or QB. They wanted CMC to sell tickets because Rhule is Defense minded coach and wanted to start that rebuild first. That’s why I was hoping we would have landed a more offense minded coach .

Right it has been said but not even a remote shred of evidence that this offense is designed or built for any damn thing never mind a specific person.

1...literally one shred of evidence from OP or his friend or whoever else....simply overworking CMC isn't an offensive design or a build.

[TDGone]

50 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Naw we will beat the giants. They are hella bad 

They have know healthy WR but hey we got a lot of cb”s

[Jackie Lee]

3 minutes ago, TDGone said:

Running against the Vikes is not the same as running on the Saints. Let’s see what Hubbard does if goes up against the Bucs D.We want to get away from giving the same back 25 rushes or 30 touches a game so why should we do that with Hubbard

He averaged 4 yards a carry today with no signs of slowing down. Insert whatever RB name you want but the running game was working better than the passing game so why abandon the run? Even the Vikings youtubers were saying run on them to beat them on PNP