Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule says the Panthers offense is about to have a "vastly different look," redefined with more of an emphasis on the run game.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

The drops sunk the offense no doubt. We hit rock bottom. But let's be clear. The offense has been trending downward three games in a row. The oline has been a big issue but even with some time the defense knows what to expect. We struggle with anything deep and that makes us more one dimensional. Joe Brady has been an issue but beyond the oc something is going on and if it continues this skid could along with it. Sam has to find the deep ball bc if he doesn't someone else may be next year 🤷‍♂️

I really don't understand it.    Don't they practice the Deep Ball AT ALL??

It's almost like they only practice the Short and Intermediate routes (and it's evident in the games we see).  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to blame the defense when they produced the bulk of the points we had and were on the field 10+ minutes more because of how badly the offense shat the bed. Not to mention the short fields due to boneheaded INT's and bad fumbles.

If you didn't notice in the 4th/OT, they were fuging gassed.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wonderful...........the weakest part of Panthers offense is a line that can't open any holes and no power running back.

Well do they think they are going to do?

Did you see the Titans running game against Bills recently.........what do the Panthers have that could make an attack like that???

Panthers are going from bad to Jets territory with this strategy...........LOL '

This coach is a joke.........he belongs in so so college programs. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Spatric said:

Just a thought, Maybe instead of blaming the O, maybe just ,maybe he should be looking at a D that over the last two games gave up over - in OVER - 900 yards of O.  

how many passing yards did the Panther offense have with 9 minutes left in the game on Sunday? 

the D literally put the game on a silver platter vs the Eagles and the O said no thank you. 

If you have horrible offense....the defense will always end up looking poor. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

Down and distance predicates number of defenders more so than who the actual running back is.

For example, 1st and 10 they are probably seeing similar number of guys in the box. CMC is probably getting some different looks in the passing game but the majority of rushing attempts are probably more similar than you think.

 

so you are saying NFL defenses don't gameplan specifically for the best overall RB in all the NFL, who the entire O is build off of....any different than a mid round rookie RB? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

how many passing yards did the Panther offense have with 9 minutes left in the game on Sunday? 

the D literally put the game on a silver platter vs the Eagles and the O said no thank you. 

If you have horrible offense....the defense will always end up looking poor. 

I literally don't understand the people blaming this on the defense. I am not sure what game they were watching.

Just look at the fuging drive summaries alone. The offense had generated 6 points prior to that last drive that didn't come off short fields due to TO's created by the defense or scores by special teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

so you are saying NFL defenses don't gameplan specifically for the best overall RB in all the NFL, who the entire O is build off of....any different than a mid round rookie RB? 

I’m saying on a large percentage of running down and distances they are seeing similar looks, and the tape says the same.

Even if we do say he is seeing considerable more attention on running downs and we add .5 yard to his YPC over the course of a 20 carry game that is an extra 10 yards rushing, which isn’t much considering he is shaking off the initial arm tackle as often as you made it sound.

This idea that you would have drastically different results with CMC rushing is overplayed, if carries are equalized.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's tough to see how this team becomes some sort of smash-mouth running offense with the OL personnel we currently have.   Outside of Deonte Brown (who's hurt) and maybe Moton, there's no other linemen on the Panther's roster who are big enough to just blow people off of the line of scrimmage.  

I think this is more wishful thinking by Rhule than a plan that will actually work.  He sees his WR drop the ball constantly so "hey, let's run more instead !".  

Defenses are just going to load the box and our RB will run into a wall every play.   It's going to be "three and out" all game long.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GOAT said:

I've grown accustomed to expecting opposite of what Rhule says.

That means hurry up tempo, 5 wide, fug it chug it football.

Hopefully similar to the game tying drive that we saw.

took way too long for them to go to the hurry up spread offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hepcat said:

took way too long for them to go to the hurry up spread offense

Maybe they'll start doing it from the beginning and this next game is the perfect opportunity to experiment with that against a hapless Giants team.

If they do that and Sam excels, maybe they may have found the key to Sam's complicated "lock", so to speak.

But if Sam still struggles, then they'll definitely know once and for all that there is no fixing him. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Corbett is an above average lineman and apparently really smart.  He has the second highest cap hit on the team and cutting him would be even more expensive.  I'd rather the guy play center than sit on his ass on the bench while we trot out some 5th rounder. We have a lot to fix and it wasn't going to happen in one season.  I believe we are markedly better than last year but very thin/raw.  If everyone stays healthy, this could be an interesting year - maybe 5-6 wins and some close competitive losses.  
    • We have a former starter now serving as a backup for the middle three positions, and probably the third string T on both sides (BC).  We are still developing Zavala and I hope Mays shows some growth.  Zavala started at times in 2023, as did Mays.  We added two guards that flipped us from abysmal to elite at G.  We added a swing T that could start on many teams.  The idea is to work Ekwonu hard on his mechanics.   With the two stud guards beside him, Corbett can call blocking schemes (he is smart, working beside the C for some time) to offset stunts and blitzes he sees presnap.  Your point?  Based on what we know, it makes no sense--based on what they know, it seems to make perfect sense.  I mean, you have 2 guards that started in the NFL for extended periods transitioning to center.  It is not like you are moving a rookie G to center--and the TB Bucs will do that with Barton, the T they drafted from Duke. Maybe this is NOT the ideal situation, but they feel good enough about it not to address it in the draft.  Since OL was a priority, it makes no sense to draft a RB when you don't have a center.  It means to me that RB was a bigger need than C--because Frazier was on the board at 46 (He was picked by the Steelers at 51).  So back to the OL--Ekwonu will improve under the new coaching--Campen sucked footballs (literally--he really kissed footballs), the guards went from terrible to elite, the C is manned by 2 former starters, and Moton anchors the right side.  Depth?  BC can play any position, but probably will be left to backup G and C.  Nijman is an average OT by NFL standards (61 PFF) and he is a swing T.  Behind them, Mays and Zavala are young and could use some development--I see why they are not adding a player, but the C they picked up in UDFA is likely to be signed to the PS and he could compete when ready.
    • I mean, didn't Les Snead walk around with that "fug those picks" shirt after their Super Bowl?🤣
×
×
  • Create New...