Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold : Will he make it to a 2nd season here?


glenwo2
 Share

Sam Darnold : Will he make it to a 2nd season here? (Poll)  

184 members have voted

  1. 1. Sam Darnold : Will he make it to a 2nd season here?

    • Yes, he will get one final chance with a (hopefully) upgraded O-Line
    • No. He's gone and good f'n riddance
    • Too Early to tell. Let's see how these next 11 games go

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 10/31/2021 at 09:00 PM

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Waldo said:

From Teddy to Sam to Tua...too depressing for this early in a crappy season. I just can't, it's like we are addicted to putting hope on guys who played their best ball in college. The tape on all 3 is reason enough to say 'hell no'. 

Well as someone said, we might not be bad enough to have a shot at Malik Willis so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scum of the Turf said:

Ridiculous thread.  Sam is good , oline is bad.  Sam is also young.  He has a lot of tools to work with.  Give him an oline before you say he’s done

I didn't create the thread titled "Is Sam Darnold done?".

I created the thread asking if Sam makes it to a 2nd season here. 

This was in no way bashing his skills, only asking for everyone's opinion on what will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Waldo said:

From Teddy to Sam to Tua...too depressing for this early in a crappy season. I just can't, it's like we are addicted to putting hope on guys who played their best ball in college. The tape on all 3 is reason enough to say 'hell no'. 

At least they tried to get Stafford and Watson, so they know what a good QB actually looks like. We just can't have them dumpster diving for backup QB's or obvious busts again.

We have to find a competent QB.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

At least they tried to get Stafford and Watson, so they know what a good QB actually looks like. We just can't have them dumpster diving for backup QB's or obvious busts again.

We have to find a competent QB.

All true, I just can't pretend Tua is anything different than the other two. If we were talking about a quality backup, my tune would change. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

All true, I just can't pretend Tua is anything different than the other two. If we were talking about a quality backup, my tune would change. 

I'd definitely rather have Tua than Darnold or Teddy but I am not sure that is really saying much. I would certainly not be willing to invest much draft capital in obtaining someone like Tua. Nor would I view him as the future.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, frankw said:

Uh yeah that's anything but a settled fact. Still very much up and down is the best compliment you can give at this point.

Would love for there to be more of the "Up" part...

...unfortunately at times, that is preceded by the word "Throw" this season.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Scum of the Turf said:

Ridiculous thread.  Sam is good , oline is bad.  Sam is also young.  He has a lot of tools to work with.  Give him an oline before you say he’s done

LOL. So what you are saying is Darnold is only good with a good O-line. Which is the opposite of a good QB. Gotcha. 
A good starting QB can find success no matter the condition of the O-line. 
Saying Darnold is good and just needs a better O-line shows a lot of tunnel vision on your part. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Rhule going down with the ship, huh? I am fine with him being on the team as a backup. 

So who starts at QB if Sam is the backup?

I keep hearing how Sam would be a decent backup and all but no solutions as far as who QB1 would be.

And don't say Watson because I do not see Fitt giving up THREE 1st-rounders for him (which is what Houston STILL demands).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

If Darnold is gone then this coaching staff should leave with him. You don’t get to keep experimenting with QBs. 

Theoretically, you're correct.

But Rhule was given a 7-year deal so he might have one final chance....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...