Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade CMC


ncsu12engr
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, frankw said:

Idk that contract is an albatross and he has to show he can be healthy for more than 2 or 3 games. What a horrific panic move that was with NO QUARTERBACK in sight. Can't believe that blew up in our faces.

His contract is not that bad

his ability to stay on the field is terrible 

what could we get for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cmac is a high valued trade asset… see the difference when he is on the field then off 3-0 to 0-4 without him …. That being said I think he is part of the package for Watson.. I think he was purposely held out to trade deadline for that reason and the fact that he will be ready to make big push in the 2nd half in the new extended schedule season  …. Don’t know why Watson would come here over Mia without cmac tho… who knows …..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ncsu12engr said:

If CMC comes back and has a good 2nd half of the season we should trade him while we can still get good value for him. 

He doesn’t really have trade value.  He is highly paid RB that can’t stay healthy. 

RB is the easiest position to solve on the cheap.   

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Tbe said:

We should but it wont. E easy. His contract is not attractive.

People keep talking about his contract. His contract is not that bad. It's maybe 2 or 3 mil more per year than other top backs in the league. The problem is his ability to stay on the field. If someone believes that he'll get over these nagging injuries (which is not outside the realm of believability), then that contract will stop nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lanorris Sellers is my choice but I'm biased of course. He should honestly stay another year and develop as a passer though. 
    • DCs have got a couple of years of Canales' play-calling now to see what he's doing the same between TB & CAR. Most fans without an anti-player agenda understood coming in that this was going to be a season about developing the young guys (something most fans have been clamoring for since the soft reboots started taking place), but the coaches are in the same boat imo. Not only does Evero need to show that last season was an aberration, Canales needs to show that he has an offensive mind that can compete with some of these great defensive coordinators around the league. I think one of the adjustments for that particular play is going to be having Tremayne (or whoever the WR ends up being) create a contact with the SS before his break to the corner if the CB has outside leverage. I recall seeing the same (or at least a very similar) play drawn up during preseason where XL was breaking open to the corner after getting to the CBs outside shoulder but the ball went elsewhere due to pressure. Shoot... I think this might be the season that I finally challenge myself to try and figure out which plays/concepts we see most often and when. The last decade of reviewing all-22s after frustrating L's has helped me learn so much more about the game. 😄
    • I think he should keep it tbh and try to improve at it all. We hired him to be the f'ing playcaller and head coach, so deal with the bumps of someone learning on the job with a limited QB. It's fine. 
×
×
  • Create New...