Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule Shuts Down College Rumors


CarolinaLivin
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

You had me until that bolded part. You  are speculating big time. It is way too early to make that determination.

The proof is in the pudding. Darnold and Bridgewater were both Rhule endorsed. Fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me. 
So no it isn’t too early to speculate if Rhule is bad at evaluating QBs. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

The proof is in the pudding. Darnold and Bridgewater were both Rhule endorsed. Fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me. 
So no it isn’t too early to speculate if Rhule is bad at evaluating QBs. 

 

Why? Because some Huddlers say so. He has made 2 calculated risks. There is no evidence whatsoever that he cannot evaluate QBs. Because he hasn't had to yet.

 

If Teddy had  balls, he might still be here. Sam was a top 3 prospect, it was worth the throw of the dice.

 

That said. I am wondering, if Sam doesn't work, where our next QB will come from?

 

Maybe we can wait and see how this all works out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Yeah, it's so easy to get top QBs to go to a rebuilding Temple, or Baylor. Those kids want tv games. Something that Rhule couldn't guarantee.

 

As for the rest? Not sure how to respond. You've pretty  much shut the door on any discussion.

I mean I’m over here watching Coastal Carolina, Liberty, Pitt, UNC, NDSU, Wyoming and Nevada recruit and develop QBs that could be or have been early draft picks. He has had 0 success with 2 blunders in 2 years in the NFL. I’m not saying he is a bad coach, he just needs to let someone else evaluate the QB position. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I mean I’m over here watching Coastal Carolina, Liberty, Pitt, UNC, NDSU, Wyoming and Nevada recruit and develop QBs that could be or have been early draft picks. He has had 0 success with 2 blunders in 2 years in the NFL. I’m not saying he is a bad coach, he just needs to let someone else evaluate the QB position. 

 

Oh come on. This is getting out of control. Rhule has a scouting staff, he has College evaluators, he has experts helping him. To think Rhule is the only  one with input on these things is naive at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Oh come on. This is getting out of control. Rhule has a scouting staff, he has College evaluators, he has experts helping him. To think Rhule is the only  one with input on these things is naive at best.

Correct, but he has the final call. He may want to hire some scouts/evaluators that are better at evaluating QBs and listen to them. It’s a tough thing to do, but the Teddy and Darnold blunders were kind of obvious to a lot of people with no back up plans and a lot of money vested. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Oh come on. This is getting out of control. Rhule has a scouting staff, he has College evaluators, he has experts helping him. To think Rhule is the only  one with input on these things is naive at best.

ATTACK the post not the poster! He's not naive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Correct, but he has the final call. He may want to hire some scouts/evaluators that are better at evaluating QBs and listen to them. It’s a tough thing to do, but the Teddy and Darnold blunders were kind of obvious to a lot of people with no back up plans and a lot of money vested. 

 

Yeah, that's pretty much the party line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...