Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold and Panthers will Bounce Back Today


The Huddler
 Share

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, Rags said:

This offense is a bunch of very solid guys with no real elite playmakers without CMac. 

Like this is a great game overall by Brady and no one's made any real mistakes (besides some drops) 

We just don't have any real play makers. 

That 1st play would like a word with you on the mistakes part......

 

But yeah that game was pretty good on terms of what they needed to do go win. Keep the D off the field and methodically move the ball. Something we have called for FOREVER!

The line has been terrible trying to keep the QB upright, but ok as run blocking. Add it Ricci balling as a old school FB, and the three headed RB group looked pretty good.  Abdullah is a little more CMC as a receiver but we have 2 ok rushers anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, bigdavis said:

But wait... I'm sure @LinvilleGorgewill be by soon, to eat his crow.

(If I can do it, you can, Mr. Mod from the Dark Side)

Darnold wasn't very good. He just wasn't disastrously terrible and that allowed the D to secure the W. This is the way we have to play this year. We have to actively deemphasized the passing game. 

You're playing yourself wanting to spike the football over this.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bigdavis said:

It's okay.  Exhalation accomplished.

If "playing myself" is being a supporter of the team, rather than an outright hater, then so be it.  I haven't lived this long being negative.

 

I don't mind getting crap. Cuz it matters not. I just enjoy football, and usually talking about it.

 

There's still a bunch of us who are not ready to jump off that cliff. Thankfully, there are still folks to chat with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Darnold wasn't very good. He just wasn't disastrously terrible and that allowed the D to secure the W. This is the way we have to play this year. We have to actively deemphasized the passing game. 

You're playing yourself wanting to spike the football over this.

Any time Sam does not throw an INT in a game, I'd call him "very good" for him.

That's where I've arrived at with him at this point. 

Sure he didn't toss a TD (even though he should've been credited with one with DJ) but no INTs is always a good thing.

Oh and no Turnovers aka Fumbles either so that's good as well.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A team should do everything they can to prop up their investment in a QB regardless of who it is. 
    • I am not wanting to be too judgemental of Morgan over his first draft given the circumstances.  People don’t like my rationale but you know, I don’t so much like theirs either.  I was adamantly against drafting Bryce and very resentful over the extreme (imo) measures taken to prop him up. I feel like Dan got caught in that trap with demands or conditions placed on him to help out the QB and the new Offensive minded head coach.  And my biased opinion is that it was still all Bryce centric. Micro managed and solely focused on making him a viable player after his first disastrous season. Mandated to help the offense in that draft.  I feel like my speculation is reasonable given the climate and situation, and it includes the reasons we didn’t take a C, the reasons we overdrafted a RB and that particular WR. It was totally need based. Perceived needs. All to maximize Bryce.    And if it were me, and I wanted the GM slot of my team that I came up with, I would be willing to accede to the agenda that I feel was in place. The goals he had to meet.  It is pretty simple, just put Bryce’s needs at the center of everything that was done and work your way through it.  I have no idea or inside info, and people have mocked my opinion for it but that is what it is, it still makes sense to me. 
    • We can’t lose this guy he is the brains behind the operation 
×
×
  • Create New...