Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Play calling was fine.IMO

scpanther22

By scpanther22,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Happy Panther Grand Master

Happy Panther

Posted
Posted

Why didn't we run the no huddle stuff with Jake calling the plays that worked so well against ATL? There was none of that after the first drive. Pretty stupid to bail on what works.

I thought there was still some of that.

anyway so many missed tackles and our D line getting worked I think is what lost us the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nosuchthingasapanther Explorer

nosuchthingasapanther

Posted
Posted

27 rushing attempts vs. 42 passing attempts from a team that built to run the ball.

average gain per passing play 4.4.

average gain per rushing play 6.7.

this looks like poor play calling.

passing the ball on 3rd and 1 with stewart in the backfield...

...poor play calling. i don't care if it is steve smith you're passing the ball to.

passing the ball on any down and goal when you have double trouble in the backfield...

...poor play calling.

i can go on and on.

if i had a nickel for every time i said "what the devil are they doing?" last night....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

that is Fox talk. Fox could call 8 consecutive hail marys to start the game and say it was just a matter of not executing them.

Both RBs averaged over 5 yards/carry in the 1st half and were destroying the Phins. Fox again opted to go back to what got the team in this mess and deserted the ground game opting for Jake to be the hero. Miami did not dictate that.....Fox just did it. Should have been up big in the first half if the PLAYCALLING played to the strengths of what we do and what was working.

OL was great in run blocking and the RBs were awesome.......Fox turned his back on that. That isn't good playcalling.

He then went to the weakest aspect of the offense for no reason...over and over. Jake proved all year he can't make the plays. He opted for Jake and forced the OL (which had just been shaken up) to go into pointless pass protection. That isn't good playcalling.

Arguably the best ground game in the NFL. 2 redzone attempts....1 run play called. That isn't good playcalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

The playcalling was fine for the most part...it was execution that was the problem.thats been the problem all season.

No. Jake should not throw 40 times. When he already threw for 20 times going into the 3rd quarter that should have been how many he threw at the end of the game.

Don't sit there and tell me it was "fine" playcalling when we stopped running the ball where DWill was averaging 9 yards a run. Don't tell me it made sense to keep passing, where we were averaging less yards per pass play than a run play! Get out of here.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sultan33g Newbie

Sultan33g

Posted
Posted

No. Jake should not throw 40 times. When he already threw for 20 times going into the 3rd quarter that should have been how many he threw at the end of the game.

Don't sit there and tell me it was "fine" playcalling when we stopped running the ball where DWill was averaging 9 yards a run. Don't tell me it made sense to keep passing, where we were averaging less yards per pass play than a run play! Get out of here.....

keep deangelo in the game more....let them trade series and not 2 plays after another...deangelo is by far the superior back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MillionDollarCam
      Off Season Thread

      By MillionDollarCam · Posted

      I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • WhoKnows
      Best draft picks ever at each slot (4 Panthers)

      By WhoKnows · Posted

      Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Gapanthersfan
      Panthers Blueprint out now

      By Gapanthersfan · Posted

      Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...