Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OBJ


Calboyz13
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

I find it amazing how one catch on a big market team, vs a big market team suddenly propels you into super stardom. 

 

That wasn't propelled him to super stardom, it was the 288 receptions, 4122 yds and 35 TDs in his first three season in the NFL. He was a three time Pro Bowler on his rookie deal.

The bulk of his issues are health related. In his last five seasons, he had played more than 7 games a year just twice. Both those years he was a 1000+ yard WR.

Don't get it twisted, OBJ was one of the best WR's in the NFL. The question is, is he still that?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

He had 1k yards receiving 5 of his first six seasons? 

 

Do y'all watch football? 

62 yards a game is (was) a 1000 yard season.    Any feautred RB or #1 WR in theory should hit that if healthy. 

now, it's just 58 yards a game. 

OBJ is physically gifted WR.....that is injury prone, a basketcase and a shitty teammate.  So in summary, he isn't a great WR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

I find it amazing how one catch on a big market team, vs a big market team suddenly propels you into super stardom. 

 

Dude OBJ was ballin when he first got in the league. He is washed up now. Could maybe have some sort of resurgence if he gets with the right team. 
 

injuries and off the field stuff (like a video of him doing the Bolivian marching powder) and his daddy crying about throwing him the ball on Twitter aren’t good looks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

injuries and off the field stuff (like a video of him doing the Bolivian marching powder) and his daddy crying about throwing him the ball on Twitter aren’t good looks. 

Lesson of 2021 - when your daddy has to come out to make the case for you.....you done.  Sorry, Cam.  That's you too.   And don't get all crazy people.  Cam is my all time favorite Panther.   But his career is over.   And that's not really fair but that's what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

62 yards a game is (was) a 1000 yard season.    Any feautred RB or #1 WR in theory should hit that if healthy. 

now, it's just 58 yards a game. 

OBJ is physically gifted WR.....that is injury prone, a basketcase and a shitty teammate.  So in summary, he isn't a great WR. 

Outside the last three years, his career average is 92.8 yds/game.

Don't use him being a nutcase and banged up to diminish how good of a player he was.

I remember people doing that to Terrell Owens too. I hated that dude but he was an all-time great WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That wasn't propelled him to super stardom, it was the 288 receptions, 4122 yds and 35 TDs in his first three season in the NFL. He was a three time Pro Bowler on his rookie deal.

The bulk of his issues are health related. In his last five seasons, he had played more than 7 games a year just twice. Both those years he was a 1000+ yard WR.

Don't get it twisted, OBJ was one of the best WR's in the NFL. The question is, is he still that?

Fair. But there are also a lot of other good players that put up stats, but play on smaller market teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...