Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Patriots at Panthers GameDay Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I wasn't even talking about rookies, I mentioned the best QBs in the NFL. And surprise, a lot of them weren't great as rookies and had big question marks about their games. 

I agree on the needing a QB. But there is no way one was going to fix it this year. And one won't next year either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Poll question:

You want a rookie QB behind this O-line or Sam Darnold behind a decent O-line?

This should be obvious.  Please actually put this in a poll in a separate thread. I would LOVE to see exactly how delusional this fan base really is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chbright said:

 

Not a strawman on this season with a rookie or a rookie next year. As you said they didn't just make it work year one.

 

All you have is a calling everything a straw man. Must be trolling.

So basically you want to win immediately and won't be able to deal with growing pains that are natural when dealing with young players. Maybe football ain't for you bc this team ain't gonna be good overnight 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ImaginaryKev said:

So basically you want to win immediately and won't be able to deal with growing pains that are natural when dealing with young players. Maybe football ain't for you bc this team ain't gonna be good overnight 

No that's you with this problem if it's win now.

Yeah we are fuged for 2 years plus now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chbright said:

No that's you with this problem if it's win now.

Yeah we are fuged for 2 years plus now.

Again, you are projecting. 

If the Panthers ever wanna win they need a QB, one might be available next year and they don't even need the 1st pick, and they can also improve the line esp since as Brady Christensen has proven, rookie offensive lineman can't just start right away. He'll start after a year in the weight room. Centers can be found later in the draft. Guards in free agency. Don't put words in my mouth bc youre upset about the loss bc clearly you haven't thought about any of this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...