Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One touchdown in 12 quarters


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, davos said:

I was looking back at 2010 and really cemented in my mind we could barely score after Moore was "injured" early that year thrusting Jimmy in.  And it's true.  Never forget the agony that was 2010.

Jimmy's lines were like 10-23 50 yards and an INT.  It seriously does not get worse than that season.  An owner basically deciding to mail it in for the year with a coach w/nothing to care about/on the way out.  And a horrible horrible QB we had to throw in after what we thought we found in Matt Moore did not in any way materialize.  That was just painful.

Problem is this IS more painful because of the talent this team has.  Far and away a potential playoff team with the right QB+Coach combo.  And we....chose...POORLY

MOaeLUj.gif?noredirect

 

Start of season skews it a little. But the last 5 games is every bit as bad as prime Clausen 2010. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

anyone putting this all on the QB is dumb AF

Literally no one says it is 100% all Sam and only Sam. 

but Sam is a huge part of the problem and his part was painfully obvious from day 1 and avoidable.  He is the worst QB in the NFL. 

Horrible OL play isn’t actually a unique thing to Carolina.   Lots of teams have it.  Every week we see our stud pass rushers go literally unblocked to the opposing QB.   And bad coaching is pretty common too.  

it’s a QB league.   So it the convo is always going to be centered there 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Imagine an alternate universe where we kept teddy, literally spent every draft pick on o line, and made a deep playoff push 

Or even better... drafted Fields, still kept Teddy, and used every other pick on the line while not having to give them up for Darnold and guarantee him 19 million. Now we have the future at QB waiting, and a improving O-line, on rookie deals.

Oh well, instead we traded a likely early 2nd for Darnold which could have been used on the line, gave starter money to two injury prone, mediocre journeyman lineman, and still need a QB and O-line. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Brady making mike shula look like 90s Norv Turner. His offense is as bad as chip kellys keep it back at college where it belongs. Our entire offense sucks and it starts with the playcalling, he needs to be canned asap.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Our 2 most media loved QBs are 2 of our worst. Meanwhile they hated our best QB.

2 of those kept us in the basement like a good small market.

1 shattered thru and made us relevant against all odds.

You don’t win unless it’s good for the league.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

literally tons of people are already saying that

Nah. It’s just the last part of my post.  It’s a QB league so that is naturally where the convo goes.  We brought in the worst QBS in the NFL and he is huge part of the problem. 

everyone knows the OL sucks and the coaches are lacking too.  But again, it’s a QB league.  Sam is going to dominate the talk. 

I mean there might one or two people trolling saying that.  Most of those hard on Sam acknowledge there is a lot wrong in Carolina. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

No, yeah.

You're wrong. That's what people are doing.

Ok.  Everyone is saying it is all Sam fault.  OL is actually good.   So is Rhule.  So is Brady.  So is Robby.  
 

that’s what people are saying lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you think the NFL or NBA are worried about lawsuits or something like officiating scandals bringing down their empires, I think you're giving them way too much credit.  Go watch the documentary on Tim Donaghy in the NBA and who was involved and what he did.  One of the guys he worked with is still one of the league's top trusted officials, especially for playoff games.  IIRC, they have records showing he was the person Donaghy exchanged phone calls with the most during his time fixing games.  And his reputation is beyond horrible...  but he's untouchable.  I also encourage you to go watch DeMaurice Smith's Breakfast Club interview.  He laid out how for fans, we just know these organizations as a singular, public entity - like THE Carolina Panthers, or THE Dallas Cowboys- but, in actuality, he said that is the public-facing identity of an umbrella company comprised of countless smaller businesses and LLCs.  He is tasked with trying to audit their books, and he said these organizations are structured in such a way that even HE can't ever know what they truly make in a year.  It's impossible.  And now, this is just me speculating on top of that, but you think the league's themselves are structured similarly?  They are untouchable.  IIRC, they are recognized legally as "entertainment" organizations, thus protecting themselves in cases where integrity would come into question.  They are protected, layer, behind layer, behind layer.  Betting works because there is some degree of control that ensures the house wins more than it loses, by a lot.  The short of it is, "Give them bread and circuses" and all that jazz.  These leagues operate with total impunity.  Again, it's not just because I'm a Panthers fan, but even if I wasn't and I watched Superbowl 50 without a dog in the fight I would walk away feeling like that outcome was controlled and influenced HEAVILY to where the Panthers were not given a level playing field.  The same poo happens every Sunday to teams playing those blue blood franchises and ones with intriguing storylines. 
    • This Chuba isn't getting traded, but Rico very well could be in a few weeks if he keeps playing well in a tandem backfield with Chuba also playing well. I think we'd end up going with a two headed monster in that case, but with Rico being on a one year deal, it does open up the possibility of a contending team offering up a decent pick for him.  Depending on the recovery of Hampton, I could see someone like the Chargers giving us a 4th for him if they think he could put them over the top, he would fit nicely in a Harbaugh system I think. If it comes to that, we need to make that trade, as I can't see any way we re-sign Rico with all our other needs and getting Brooks back too.  And he's not going to get a contract big enough to get us any comp picks in return, especially if/when we sign a FA or two ourselves.  So if we're not going to bring him back, the prudent decision would really be to get a draft pick for him at the deadline.
    • It's all about what they do at QB. It's clear the rest of the roster is improving. If they commit long term to Young because he's being carried to wins then we're fuged. I think that's a separate issue to finally being competitive again.  There's no QB in this Draft that's going to ride in on his white horse on day one and save us, so we absolutely shouldn't be playing for Draft position. 
×
×
  • Create New...