Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam to Rhule after penalty thoughts?


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

https://linguaholic.com/linguablog/say-less/

What does “say less” mean?

“Say less” is slang for “I understand” or “I get the gist of what you are saying.” You can also use it when you agree with someone and see eye to eye with them. In a sense, it’s a way of saying that no further explanation is needed.

Literally posted this on page 1 with no copy and paste needed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must have missed this, but I don't like Rhule saying "don't do it again". Not sure what his tone was or anything, but he himself said he wants the full Cam - and that's him.

That was a huge moment, worse penalties have occurred in the "DBO" error. That is a moment that has no affect, it's intimidating, warranted, and momentum building.

This reunion should be all about letting #1 be himself 100% as long as he's scoring TD's and getting W's.

Rhule should thank him for saving his job.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GOAT said:

I must have missed this, but I don't like Rhule saying "don't do it again". Not sure what his tone was or anything, but he himself said he wants the full Cam - and that's him.

That was a huge moment, worse penalties have occurred in the "DBO" error. That is a moment that has no affect, it's intimidating, warranted, and momentum building.

This reunion should be all about letting #1 be himself 100% as long as he's scoring TD's and getting W's.

Rhule should thank him for saving his job.

even cam said he understood and he wouldn't let it happen again.

we all know there's emotional players out there who would've let the energy get the beter of them for the detriment of the team. Cam did not. No need to defend him here. No need to criticize Cam here. 

Everyone got it. No one cared. Everyone loved it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rico6 said:

Fair, but "mAh LiTersHipZ" is straight up tripe

The whole leadership argument(for or against) is completely ridiculous. It didn't help "lead" a team any more than it showed poor leadership.

At best, it got some of the players hyped up but they would have been hyped up had he took off his helmet or not.

The act itself was ultimately selfish but I completed understand the need and want to do so. Had the Panthers done the same thing to me, I probably wouldn't be nearly as nice with my celebration.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Arguing about who had what and who did what with more is just going to end in the same charades. If we're going to waste a lot of hot air arguing then make it about something that cannot be denied. What you are seeing with your own two eyes. Cam Newton was a tremendously talented athlete albeit flawed in fundamental aspects. And although he played poorly in and lost a Super Bowl you cannot deny him that more often than not through his prime his teammates knew they could count on him to hold up his end of the bargain usually and be a key driving force for keeping them in games. Giving his defense much needed rest and motivation in wanting to match his grit as a competitor. That aspect is just not there with Bryce Young. Yeah he's dumped on the Falcons in a dome twice but what about his other 44 games? When has the Panthers defense the last three years ever looked at their starting quarterback and thought to themselves "man I'm so glad he's my QB"?
    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
×
×
  • Create New...