Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why not Doug Pederson?


ENCPantherfan2
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wouldn’t be against it. Still an Eberflus guy. 
 

Call me superstitious

Capers-Defensive Guy-Playoffs/Division title

Seifert-Offensive Guy- No playoffs

Fox- Defensive guy-3 times playoffs/2 division titles

Rivera-Defensive guy-4 times playoffs/2 division titles

Rhule- Offensive guy- poo show

 

Our “identity” Rhule has been trying to find for 2 years now is what it’s always been. Defense and running the damn rock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Wouldn’t be against it. Still an Eberflus guy. 
 

Call me superstitious

Capers-Defensive Guy-Playoffs/Division title

Seifert-Offensive Guy- No playoffs

Fox- Defensive guy-3 times playoffs/2 division titles

Rivera-Defensive guy-4 times playoffs/2 division titles

Rhule- Offensive guy- poo show

 

Our “identity” Rhule has been trying to find for 2 years now is what it’s always been. Defense and running the damn rock.

I like Eberflus for HC as well. Pair him with Pederson as OC. They both have Frank Reich connections. Seems like a classic Panthers coaching combo. Pederson can develop a rookie QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I like Eberflus for HC as well. Pair him with Pederson as OC. They both have Frank Reich connections. Seems like a classic Panthers coaching combo. Pederson can develop a rookie QB.

Pederson and Reich both went to training camp with the Panthers in 95.

Reich obviously made the final roster but Pederson didn't.

Side note: Always felt like we benched Reich too early that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pederson and Reich both went to training camp with the Panthers in 95.

Reich obviously made the final roster but Pederson didn't.

Side note: Always felt like we benched Reich too early that year.

I remember them saying it was for Collins development and yadda yadda. Collins didn’t blow me out of the water in 96. We would have had the same or better results with Beuerlein that year, he played great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

I remember them saying it was for Collins development and yadda yadda. Collins didn’t blow me out of the water in 96. We would have had the same or better results with Beuerlein that year, he played great.

A coin flip had big consequences there.

Bill Polian stated that if the Panthers would have had the first pick in the expansion draft, they'd have taken Beuerlein.

Not sure how having the number 2 pick in the college draft would have affected things given that we traded down from number one anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cdparr7 said:

 

Rhule- Offensive guy- poo show

 

Our “identity” Rhule has been trying to find for 2 years now is what it’s always been. Defense and running the damn rock.

I'm not sure I'd call Rhule an offensive guy. He's always built his teams on strong defense and an okay offense. He has said he owes his success to Phil Snow. The longer you're with someone the harder it is for them to his ego they really are. Rhule seems much more like he's cut from the defense minded Capers/Fox/Riveria mold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I like Eberflus for HC as well. Pair him with Pederson as OC. They both have Frank Reich connections. Seems like a classic Panthers coaching combo. Pederson can develop a rookie QB.

If Pederson has any success running the offense, he's back in a head coach position.  Going this route, it's a one year rental of an OC and back to square one. If you give Pederson the head coach gig, you never have to worry about someone taking your OC and play caller away.

Edited by trueblade
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dave Tepper isn't ready to can Rhule at the end of this season, I'd feel better knowing that someone like Doug Pederson was on staff and waiting in the wings just in case this team continues to head south in year three.

Firing a Head Coach mid season a lot easier when there's already a viable candidate on staff to replace them.  Right now there is no one that could step into Rhule's shoes.

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2021 at 8:37 AM, ENCPantherfan2 said:

He's proven, went to a SB, only was on the outs because of that slime ball Howie Roseman, actually was right about some things in the organization (ie the FO wanted to fire Frank Reich the year they won the superbowl but he fought that off), and I believe the players actually liked him. That last year was not on him. 

Dang out of the game and I forgot about him. He put together a great staff his first time. Im still in the "give rhule 3 years" group......but if a legit big name hits the market and has tepper's dollars in his mind....bye rhule..

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...