Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Staff options if Rhule stays...

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yup might as well show weekly Confidentials instead of actually showing the games. What's going to be really interesting to see is how many free agents bail instead re-sign here. If that happens and Tepper starts noticing a trend a la Teddy and Perryman I wonder if he'd pull the trigger before next draft

Who wants to stay and who moves on is going to be interesting.

It's still to early for deffinates but it sure feels it's all headed that way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peon Awesome Experienced

Peon Awesome

Posted
Posted (edited)

They really need to go ahead and fire Brady now. If Sean Ryan is on the short list, give him a 5 week audition and see how he does. With the bye week, it's a perfect opportunity for him to assume the new role and try to design his own offense over the next 2 weeks. I'm not super high on him right now given he's the QB coach and our QB play has been uninspiring to say the least, but I'm more than happy to give him a shot. Couldn't be much worse than what we've seen from Brady most of his tenure.

Edited by Peon Awesome
Addendum
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

A lot of people have posed the question "why would these guys want to come here", and it's a valid one.

The answer in several cases would be "unemployment". 

I looked primarily at staffs that are set to be fired. Mind you, they could have other opportunities but that would depend on who gets the other head coaching jobs. New head coaches tend to prefer their own guys.

Still, the question is one reason why I left some guys off. Mike Kafka, for example, is a guy who's on the rise and is actually not under contract for next season. The question though is would he really want to go from coaching Patrick Mahomes under Andy Reid to coaching the Panthers quarterback stable under Matt Rhule.

Would you?

Throw in that if Eric Bieniemy does get a head coaching job this time around, Kafka likely gets promoted to his old job as Chiefs OC.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What's most depressing about an exercise like this is looking at the differences between who we potentially could  get and who we probably would get.

Could get: Pederson, Lazor, Olson
Would probably get: Ryan or Nixon

Could get: Castillo, Munchak or Cable
Would probably get: Sparano or maybe Flaherty

Could get: Barone or Kitchens
Would probably get: Gilbride

Could get: Bisaccia
Would probably get: Foley or perhaps keep Blackburn

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Icege said:

My thoughts from a previous thread regarding potential coaches being "replaced from within":

 

For my part, I agree any replacements that do wind up being made will probably come from our own staff.

That's just Rhule.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

For my part, I agree any replacements that do wind up being made will probably come from our own staff.

That's just Rhule.

More or less my sentiments.

There are non-Rhule guys that have Rhule guys waiting in the wings behind them.

The QB + OC pools for next reason are leaving a lot to be desired for next season... The only OC coach that didn't make me wretch was Pederson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      This has to be bitached about, those biased refs

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

    • TD alt
      DJ Moore trade talk

      By TD alt · Posted

      I mean, if Moore really wants out, then it would behoove the Bears to make it happen sooner than later. X is a lot younger and cheaper, and may be a better fit for Johnson's musings than a disgruntled, unnecessary, overpaid vet. If they can dump his salary and maybe get a fourth or so in return, it may be worth it to them. As for development, I'm not concerned. You're talking about a seeming bust, a day three guy and a UDFA. They are developing relative to their ceilings. I doubt any of them will ever command the coverage, money, or the respect that Moore has acquired. He's a tier above them. Yes, even X. 
    • ImfromClayton
      OK, now it's time to discuss a couple of yesterday's problems. Let's talk "Evero."

      By ImfromClayton · Posted

      IMO, if Ceedee plays against us, the game probably goes the other way. Same with Tyreek Hill and the Dolphins. Our team just isn't designed to beat teams with two high level receivers like that. But when you look at the league, how many teams really have two guys of that caliber?  There's nothing wrong with defensive adjustments, but sometimes I think a lot of fans want Evero to call a different play like a game on madden, and defensive football just isn't like that. That said, I thought we did a much better job this season against the Cowboys of flipping Jaycee and at least making them work for it, opposed to last season when they literally just lined CeeDee up on the other side of the field every single snap.  For us to just straight up switch to consistent man coverage, or a different zone, or whatever, we likely would consistently need different personnel on the field. Doing it a few times a game is a gamble and can work, but if we consistently run man coverage against the Cowboys, eventually a RB is going to beat a linebacker, or something of that nature with our personnel. Part of the reason Evero likes this scheme is that, while we have our defaults and presets, what we do is very multiple, and you can do a lot of different things pre and post snap. We are a challenging defense to read. But as you said, if guys are getting beat, it doesn't really matter what you call. 
×
×
  • Create New...