Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting nugget from Rhule’s Brady presser


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

Rhule commented that going forward some things would be the same outside of Nixon calling the actual plays.  Specifically that different members of the offensive staff are tasked each week with game planning different aspects of the O (redzone, 3rd down, short yardage) and that they will continue doing that…

well, maybe that shouldn’t continue as is either?   Maybe you don’t need the exact same folks cooking up stuff and handing it to the new name OC.  Seems like they would be key part of the game planning problems.  

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

In any given situation, imagine something that should be said.

Matt Rhule will say the opposite.

I mean he basically told the Giants the new gameplan right before we played them, and got taken to the woodshed by the G-men who will probably be looking for a GM, an entire new coaching staff, and a new QB. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Honestly, and I really wanted Ruhle to work out (we all did) but I have been completely blown away by how unprepared he has been, as well as his subpar coaching performances. I understand there would be growing pins and learning on the job but my God he has no clue what’s going on. He is a non power 5 conference coach at best. 
 

He has been out coached by a number of guys who may be looking for a new job in a month. 

This is Larry Fedora 2.0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder about a few things.. 

So Rhule was brought in to be a team builder. The thought always was that this was going to take a few seasons. I was cool with that. Lets do this right.

But suddenly the narrative was 'we are ready to win now'. No we weren't.

So why did the message change? 

Unfortunately the only thing I can think of is Tepper..... 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

This is Larry Fedora 2.0.

Fedora is one of the worst head coaches I’ve ever seen. I mean from top to bottom a complete moron. The only thing I respect about him is that Roy spoke highly of him off the field and when Carolina lost that heart breaker to Nova, Fedora was there for Roy. 
 

Regarding the Panthers, I was a bit young to really comprehend how bad George Seifert was but aside from the Panthers years his resume is pretty good. 
 

Ruhle is shooting his way up the list as worst Panthers coach. Perry Fewell was pretty terrible but do we even count him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

I wonder about a few things.. 

So Rhule was brought in to be a team builder. The thought always was that this was going to take a few seasons. I was cool with that. Lets do this right.

But suddenly the narrative was 'we are ready to win now'. No we weren't.

So why did the message change? 

Unfortunately the only thing I can think of is Tepper..... 

Fitts and Rhule really started talking big when we started off 3-0. 

Unfortunately, both of Rhule's seasons started with promise before unraveling badly. This one even worse than last one. What we expected was a couple of struggle seasons while showing progress. What we've actually gotten is a couple of flailing seasons showing regression.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BIGH2001 said:

Fedora at least had some decent offenses and one really good season.

He did have that one year where UNC got blatantly screwed by the officials against Clemson in Charlotte. The refs should have been investigated and promptly fired. Wonder how things work out if Carolina wasn’t cheated out of that championship. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Fedora is one of the worst head coaches I’ve ever seen. I mean from top to bottom a complete moron. The only thing I respect about him is that Roy spoke highly of him off the field and when Carolina lost that heart breaker to Nova, Fedora was there for Roy. 
 

Regarding the Panthers, I was a bit young to really comprehend how bad George Seifert was but aside from the Panthers years his resume is pretty good. 
 

Ruhle is shooting his way up the list as worst Panthers coach. Perry Fewell was pretty terrible but do we even count him? 

Fedora had no desire to recruit or play defense. He just expected his offense to outscore everyone anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...