Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So what happened to wanting to run the ball more???


KillerKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Rhule 5-6 weeks ago wanted to establish the run game more. Instead we've abandoned it every game but one since he said that. It's supposedly the reason why Brady got fired.

Today, we had a good chance of establishing it and it was working. After the long Cam pass, that was a golden opportunity to establish the run. Instead we continued slinging it. Even on the next drive when we were backed up on our goal line. Then Rhule chomps at the bit to pull Cam as soon as possible, only to continue with PJ slinging it resulting in another interception. 

It is quite obvious Rhule never wanted Cam and it was forced upon him. It is also quite obvious Rhule is full of sh!t and has no idea what he is doing. He says he wants to establish the run, but then abandons it the first chance he gets. He should be gone and needs to be gone this week. He is a complete joke.

Edited by KillerKat
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Another Rhule LIE. Are you surprised?

Thing is, Rhule was actually right. We should be running the ball more. But as soon as we're behind, he panics and only sticks to throwing. Then all the defense has to do is defend the pass and the game is over. So fuging stupid.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...