Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC Tests Positive for Covid


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

It will be interesting to say the least depending on how many of those with positive results are vaccinated.

By definition the VAST majority of positive+ results are among vaxx'd players, and this is to be expected.

Virtually all active NBA players are vaxx'd and they are at the point of cancelling games (Bulls) and have come close to cancelling others (Bobcats). 

Given that NFL "covid-protocols" create a much safer routine for unvaxx'd players -- combined with the high % of vaxx'd players overall & their extremely loose protocols -- it was perfectly obvious to anyone paying attention that the incidence of +covid+ infections in vaxx'd players would absolutely dwarf those of unvaxx'd players...

...and that's exactly how it's working out.

(has there been a single incidence of an NFL or NBA player not recovering fully?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Do teams still have to forfeit games due to an outbreak?  If so ...and I know CMC is straight,but he should kiss every player square on the mouth!  That is how bad I want Rhule gone!

Awful take.

Panthers are in top-5 of NFL teams in terms of vaxx rate %...

...zero chance they will have to forfeit a game. 

(in fact, 0.00% chance any NFL team will have to do so this season, write it down)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

By definition the VAST majority of positive+ results are among vaxx'd players, and this is to be expected.

Virtually all active NBA players are vaxx'd and they are at the point of cancelling games (Bulls) and have come close to cancelling others (Bobcats). 

Given that NFL "covid-protocols" create a much safer routine for unvaxx'd players -- combined with the high % of vaxx'd players overall & their extremely loose protocols -- it was perfectly obvious to anyone paying attention that the incidence of +covid+ infections in vaxx'd players would absolutely dwarf those of unvaxx'd players...

...and that's exactly how it's working out.

(has there been a single incidence of an NFL or NBA player not recovering fully?)

We need to stop saying people are vaccinated. Vaccines prevent sickness, these shots don’t prevent spread or infection.   This is noting more than a flu shot, it may or may not prevent you from getting sick. It’s a crap shoot. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, rippadonn said:

When I was in elementary we had a visit from a lady who had mandatory tattoo, numbers not of her choice when she was a little girl. She showed us.

Didn't take long for the holocaust comparisons to start flying. To the TB we go, I suppose.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, travisura said:

Didn't take long for the holocaust comparisons to start flying. To the TB we go, I suppose.

It was medical tyranny that lead to the Camps and deaths, same excuses, same accomplices, people not paying attention or asking "authority" questions. Instead they went lockstep into horror. Nuremberg codes are not for no reason.

Not all doctors agree with this THOUSANDS have put their name in the NO column for this vax alone. Why? 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

It was medical tyranny that lead to the Camps and deaths, same excuses, same accomplices, people not paying attention or asking "authority" questions. Instead they went lockstep into horror. Nuremberg codes are not for no reason.

Not all doctors agree with this THOUSANDS have put their name in the NO column for this vax alone. Why? 

Yes this is the exact same as the literal fugging holocaust. Jesus dude you need to get a grip. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

No it isn’t. Viruses mutate and spread. Covid is a new virus so it’s going to continue to mutate for the rest of our lives. The idea that we can somehow stop this is antithetical to the “science” that a certain segment of the population likes to use to make value judgments of others.

Yeah so I should trust you and not the experts. Seems legit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Snake said:

Yeah so I should trust you and not the experts. Seems legit. 

It is an mRNA virus, in the same family of viruses as the common cold, flu etc.......There has never been a vaccine for the flu or cold.....even the flu shot people get is marginal at best at preventing the flu. Go look it up experts are saying the "vaccine" isn't working.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...