Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At the Lions game.....


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

Lions are winning their second game all year. Their second game! They would have to win out just to tie us. lMAO

They’ve won the same number of games in their last 10 tries as us…2. They’ve won more games in the last month than us.  
 

they are getting better.  We are getting worse.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

Lions are winning their second game all year. Their second game! They would have to win out just to tie us. lMAO

If they do win out (probability low) their tie will make them better than us if we lose out(probability high) which means a better draft pick.  I’m cheering for the lions.  
 

aside from that I think you are correct tho.  Lions stench is a bit worse than the panthers at this point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Doc Holiday said:

I agree with firing Rhule, but this is stupid. Lions are definitely not better than us.

They have won 2 of their last 3 games.  

Not sure we would line up and beat them next week.  I’d rather be us big picture though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

We beat the cardinals pretty handily as well.

 

The team the Lions beat featured their starting QB.  We played a backup. They beat the Vikings 2 weeks ago too.   They are playing better of late than we are.  
 

I think we have a better roster.  Lions are playing better. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...